The Weakest Hand at the Table
On the evening of June 18, 1940, a temporary brigadier general whom virtually no one in France had heard of sat down before a microphone in a BBC studio at Broadcasting House in London and began to speak. He had no army. He had no government. He had no legal authority of any kind. The day before, he had flown out of a country collapsing into surrender, carrying a suitcase that held "a pair of trousers, four shirts and a photograph of his family," and a conviction so outsized it bordered on clinical delusion — that he, Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle, personally embodied the republic. The man who would sign the broadcast had been, a few weeks earlier, a colonel. He had been made a temporary brigadier general with effect from June 1, a rank he would keep for the rest of his life, and then appointed undersecretary of state for defense and war on June 6 — the most junior sub-cabinet minister in a government that was already dying. He had been in government for twelve days and had never been elected to anything. On June 16, when Marshal Philippe Pétain replaced Paul Reynaud as Prime Minister and moved to request an armistice with Hitler, de Gaulle prepared to leave; on June 17 he flew to England. "Madame," he told Jean Monnet's wife that night, "I am not here on a mission. I am here to save the honour of France." Vichy's court martial in Toulouse first gave him four years in jail; when Weygand complained that this was too lenient, a second court sentenced him to death.
No recording of the June 18 appeal survives. To his annoyance, the BBC did not keep it. The British Cabinet, meeting without Churchill, had first decided a broadcast would be "undesirable," and Edward Spears had to lobby the ministers "one by one" before they relented. What remains is a legend — a 400-word speech that almost nobody heard and that almost everybody, within a few years, would claim to have heard. "Whatever happens," de Gaulle said, "the flame of French resistance must not be extinguished and will not be extinguished." The French word résistance, given a capital letter by the force of his delivery, entered the language as something larger than a military term. It became a proper noun, a moral category. And the man who spoke it — gangly, aloof, with the pursed mouth and melancholy eyes of a figure from a Corneille tragedy — became, through nothing but theatrical élan and the refusal to accept what every rational calculation insisted was true, the symbol of a France that had not surrendered.
No one has ever played a weaker hand more compellingly. His life was, as Adam Gopnik has written, one long brilliant bluff. The things that made him exasperating — the vanity, the closed-mindedness, the unearned sense of superiority, the egocentric blindness that once made Churchill ready to send him back to Algiers "in chains if necessary" and led Roosevelt to doubt his democratic credentials — were precisely why the bluffs worked. He convinced men sitting at the card table with all the aces in their hands that he might have somehow manufactured an extra ace by pure force of will.
By the Numbers
The Gaullist Republic
3Rendezvous with history: 1940, 1958, 1968
78–80%Approval for the Fifth Republic constitution (September 1958 referendum)
Up to 24Assassination attempts against him as President
1 millionSettlers who fled Algeria in 1962, allowed two suitcases each
10 yearsTenure as President of the Fifth Republic (1959–1969)
~400,000Troops under his provisional government by May 1944
53%Voters who rejected his final referendum, ending his presidency (April 1969)
A Military Melancholy
The mythology requires a provincial childhood, a boy raised among the country gentry of northern France, but the fact is less picturesque. De Gaulle grew up in Paris's Seventh Arrondissement — a neighborhood he described, with a precision bordering on poetry, as marked by "a military melancholy," a sadness of grand and empty green spaces. Born on November 22, 1890, in Lille, at his grandmother's house, he was the third of five children in a family that, as Jonathan Fenby puts it, "was estranged from the Republic and looked back to an older France." His father, Henri de Gaulle, taught philosophy and literature at a Jesuit school — a man aligned with the Catholic, reactionary side of French politics but emphatically not with its Jew-hating or monarchist fanaticism. The family had produced historians and writers. The young Charles was afforded what we might now call an intellectually immersive education, steeped in Latin, Corneille, Racine, Chateaubriand. He could recite vast passages of French classical drama from memory well into his seventies. "The most wonderful job in the world would be as a librarian," he once said. He was being puckish, but not entirely so.
What the literary immersion gave him was not just erudition but a frame — the tragic frame of French classical drama, in which most hopes are doomed, all choices come at a cost, and enduring loss with dignity is the highest of human callings. This stoical view was married to a conscious philosophy of action drawn from the philosopher Henri Bergson, whom de Gaulle chose to read as a kind of proto-existentialist. Intellect needed to be braced by impulse. What you felt you should do, however irrational it might seem to others, was most often what needed to be done. "Great men have both intellect and impulse," de Gaulle wrote decades later. "The brain serves as a brake upon pure emotional impulse. The brain surmounts impulse; but there must also be impulse and the capability for action in order not to be paralysed by the brake of the brain. I remember this from Bergson who has guided me through my entire life."
He chose the military. He passed into Saint-Cyr in 1908 only 119th out of 221, graduated thirteenth out of 210, and in 1912 returned as a second lieutenant to the 33rd Infantry Regiment in Arras, where his commanding officer was Colonel Philippe Pétain. The two men — both outspoken, both self-confident, both believers in the dominance of firepower over the spirit of the bayonet charge — developed a mutual admiration that would curdle, three decades later, into the central antagonism of modern French history.
The Education of Firepower
At Dinant on August 15, 1914, Lieutenant de Gaulle led his section in a charge straight into machine guns. He fell almost immediately, a bullet in the knee, and later wondered "how it came about that I was not riddled like a sieve." Those first hours of the Great War confirmed what his pre-war reading of Pétain had suggested: firepower kills men who charge it, no matter how magnificent their élan. He returned to the regiment in October, volunteered for reconnaissance missions into no-man's-land, earned the Croix de Guerre in January 1915, and was promoted to captain in February. On March 10, at Mesnil-lès-Hurlus, during the First Battle of Champagne, he was shot in the hand. He came back again.
On February 21, 1916, the German Fifth Army attacked at Verdun. The 33rd Infantry was sent to reinforce the fortified lines around the city. On March 2, during the fighting at Douaumont, Captain de Gaulle was bayoneted in the thigh and left for dead on the field. He was not dead. He was a prisoner. For two years and eight months, he was held in German camps, among them the fortress of Ingolstadt and the castle of Rosenberg. Capture, he felt, was "a shameful misfortune which one has to avenge at any cost." He dug a tunnel. At Ingolstadt he asked his parents for picric acid, supposedly for chilblains, and swallowed enough to turn his skin muddy and his eyes yellow so that he would be sent to the town hospital, where he and another captain bribed a German nurse and walked out. They were caught after a week near Ulm, "like tramps," and he got sixty days of solitary. In 1917 he went down a cliff on a rope of sheets in a rainstorm. He made three more attempts, "the last in a laundry basket," and once spent 120 days in solitary without light, heat or books. Jackson puts the failures down to his conspicuous height. Between escapes he lectured fellow prisoners on the war ("It was not a discussion … It was an exposition") and drew up a list of escape attempts from other camps "and the reasons for their failure," briefing men being moved elsewhere in what one successful escaper called his "escape school." The captivity left him with bitter memories. He would later write that "all the virtue in the world is powerless against firepower" — a line that carried both a military doctrine and an existential wound.
Between the wars, the wound was transmuted into prophecy. He wrote books: La Discorde chez l'ennemi (1924), on the failures of German command; Le Fil de l'épée (1932), on the nature of leadership; Vers l'armée de métier (1934), on the case for a small, professional, mechanized army. The last of these was, in retrospect, one of the most consequential ignored books of the twentieth century. While the French military establishment clung to the Maginot Line and the static theories of World War I, de Gaulle argued for armored columns, mobile warfare, the concentration of tanks as an independent striking force. His ideas were dismissed by his superiors. They were, however, read with interest across the Rhine.
Our initial defeat comes from the application by the enemy of ideas that are mine.
— Charles de Gaulle, memorandum, 1940
The prophet had been right, and the result of being right was that his country was destroyed.
The Bluff Begins
The speed of France's collapse remains almost incomprehensible. In six weeks, from May 10 to June 25, 1940, the German Army dismantled what had been considered the greatest military power in Europe. The failure was political as much as it was military. Paul Reynaud, the Prime Minister, had room to fall back and reorganize — the French had done exactly that in 1914. But Reynaud made the catastrophic decision to bring into his cabinet the defeatist generals Pétain and Weygand, and he was under the sway of his equally defeatist lover, Madame de Portes. Perhaps more important, the price of the earlier comeback had been millions of dead Frenchmen, and there was simply no will to try that experiment again.
De Gaulle, commanding the 4th Armoured Division, had led two of the few successful French attacks, near Abbeville, gaining eight kilometres and taking several hundred prisoners, though the Germans held the town. He held no staff conferences and snapped at queries: "One does not question a divisional commander." On June 1, he was promoted to temporary brigadier general. On June 6, Reynaud named him undersecretary of state for defense and war. On June 16, he learned that Reynaud had been replaced by Pétain, who would request an armistice. On June 17, de Gaulle flew to London.
He arrived with nothing. "Nobody important accompanied him to London," Fenby writes, and he "had no mandate from anybody to continue resistance to the Germans in defiance of a legally constituted government." Even Reynaud, who slipped him 100,000 francs from secret funds, reportedly said that "de Gaulle is doing the wrong thing; he is undisciplined." His eighty-year-old mother was dying in Brittany.
Winston Churchill — who had met him briefly, who had already murmured "L'homme du destin" — chose to back him. In Julian Jackson's short life of de Gaulle, "Churchill's decision to back him was certainly quixotic. De Gaulle's personality appealed to Churchill's romantic imagination." On June 28, the British government recognized de Gaulle as the leader of the Free French, and only when better-known figures failed to appear did Churchill tell him, "you are alone, I shall recognize you alone." No prefect, ambassador or senior civil servant joined him in 1940. De Gaulle answered the isolation with a claim. "We are France," he told the jurist René Cassin.
The Vichy regime — Pétain's collaborationist government, installed in the spa town that would give it its name — responded with characteristic precision: de Gaulle was stripped of his rank, tried in absentia, and sentenced to death. Then, in a stroke of unintentional genius, Vichy made him the center of a hate campaign, plastering France with posters showing his tall figure behind a microphone surrounded by swarthy Jews. The effect was to make de Gaulle the one anti-German leader whom most French people had actually heard of. The Vichy regime, in the blindness of its hatred, helped create — and promote — the de Gaulle brand.
The Corneille Hero in Mayfair
In exile, paradoxically, lay his strength. His solitariness appealed to the French collective myth of the single defiant individual. His passion in London was a scene out of Corneille, like that of Rodrigue in Le Cid, the hero who rises to gloire in a moment of individual trial.
The practical reality was considerably less romantic. De Gaulle was insufferable. He refused to placate Roosevelt, acting as if he commanded a major army instead of a few borrowed rooms in Mayfair. He irritated Churchill with hyperbolic disquisitions on French honor when what Churchill wanted was cooperation with military plans. When Churchill urged him to be more accommodating, he answered that Churchill could bend because he sat on a solid state, "But me! … I am too poor … to be able to bow." "You think I am interested in England winning the war," he told Spears. "I am not. I am only interested in French victory." Churchill called the Cross of Lorraine "the heaviest cross I ever had to bear"; Eden said he had "never seen anything like it in rudeness since Ribbentrop."
"You will see, if you say 'no,' they will crawl to you and offer you the moon," de Gaulle once explained to a subordinate. His behavior was maddeningly adolescent, but he chose it for the same reason an adolescent chooses his — as the one way, in a position of actual dependency, to declare one's autonomy. In 1941 he observed that "with the English one must bang on the table."
Georges Boris — a socialist Jewish journalist in exile, writing to the imprisoned Jewish socialist Léon Blum — captured something essential about what de Gaulle meant to those who gathered around him in London:
De Gaulle gave me back honour, the possibility of being able to look people in the face again. … To a large degree, his unwillingness to bend, his intransigence are willed. He likes to say that being as weak as he is, intransigence is his only weapon.
— Georges Boris, letter to Léon Blum
The weakness was real. In early July 1940 the British sank the French fleet at Mers-el-Kébir, killing 1,285 French sailors and cutting Free French recruitment; de Gaulle weighed retiring to Canada as a private citizen, then decided overnight that fighting alongside Britain was France's only chance. For the first weeks the only colonial territory to rally was the New Hebrides, in the South Pacific. Then, on August 26, Félix Éboué brought over Chad, and Cameroun and French Equatorial Africa followed. Dakar, in September, was a disaster of de Gaulle's own planning: Vichy troops fired on Free Frenchmen, a British bombardment killed two thousand people, half of them civilians, and the expedition withdrew. "If you only knew how solitary I feel," he told a wounded officer. He reportedly told René Pleven, "I thought of, yes I thought of, blowing my brains out." Maurice Schumann felt that "After Dakar, he was never entirely happy again." By 1941, Free French forces were participating in British-controlled operations against the Italians in Libya and Egypt, and joined the British in defeating Vichy forces in Syria and Lebanon.
The transformation came through a man named Jean Moulin. A high-ranking left-wing prefect, Moulin came to London to build a secret army inside occupied France, then was parachuted back in to lead it. He was, by most accounts, everything de Gaulle was not: personally warm, politically left, possessed of an instinctive talent for drawing together the fractious, acronym-studded world of French resistance. Moulin brought credibility with all sides. De Gaulle took on some of it, though Moulin himself, asked whether de Gaulle was a democrat, answered: "I do not know." In May 1943 the Resistance council Moulin had built recognised de Gaulle as "sole leader," and by November he had squeezed his American-backed rival, General Giraud, off the governing committee entirely.
De Gaulle had at first dropped the republican motto, as Vichy did, as too politically charged. Moulin's example confirmed what he was coming to see: after Vichy made anti-republicanism synonymous with surrender, France had to be addressed in the republic's own words. He was the farthest thing in the world from an instinctive democrat. It was enough that he understood that democracy had become one of the instincts of France.
Moulin was arrested by the Gestapo in June 1943, betrayed under circumstances that remain murky to this day — was his Judas a Communist fellow-resister obeying Moscow's orders to eliminate anti-Communists? We still don't know — and tortured to death by Klaus Barbie, the Butcher of Lyon. When de Gaulle heard the news, he said, with the stoicism of a Corneille hero: "Continuons." We'll go on.
The Walk
And he did. On June 14, 1944, eight days after D-Day, he crossed to Normandy, had two astonished gendarmes pedal ahead to announce him at Bayeux, and installed his own Commissioner of the Republic before any Allied military government could take root. In Paris on August 25 he went first not to the Hôtel de Ville but to his old ministry: "Nothing was missing except the state. It was my duty to restore it." On August 26, after the Allies liberated Paris — after the Free French 2nd Armoured Division under General Jacques-Philippe Leclerc had driven into the capital to consummate the liberation, after the French Forces of the Interior had mounted an insurrection, after the barricades and the street fighting and the German surrender — de Gaulle claimed the victory as his own. He organized a personal parade down the Champs-Élysées in which he walked alone, his fellow-resisters asked to hang back a few feet, amid a throng he put at "Perhaps two million people." At Notre-Dame he "marched through the church, his shoulders thrown back" while shots rang out. "I have a providential mission to fulfil," he explained. "I think nothing will happen to me. If it does, I will have been mistaken."
He even managed to get France a place at the German surrender the following May. Seeing the French representative, Field Marshal Keitel snorted, as Fenby tells it, "Ah, the French are here too? That's all that was missing." If this triumph allowed the French to evade what had actually happened during the war — the abject armistice, the delivery of deportees to their persecutors, the entire black hole of Vichy from which so little light escaped for so long — it did put France in a position to go on.
Dwight Eisenhower, despite Roosevelt's distaste for de Gaulle, had been the one to fully embrace him as indispensable to the Normandy invasion. The American general understood what subsequent American generals planning invasions of poorly understood countries would so easily forget — that it is essential to have on your side not the local forces you wish were popular but the local forces who actually are popular. "From the purely military viewpoint we must … deal with him alone," Eisenhower wrote home to Roosevelt.
The Interregnum
De Gaulle's first encounter with governing was brief and unhappy. On September 9, 1944, he formed a government of national unanimity in Paris. He headed two successive provisional governments. In November 1945 the new assembly voted for him to continue as head of the government with a single abstention. His government nationalised Renault, the coal mines and the main banks, created social security and gave women the vote. It also brought the purge of collaborators under the courts, after mobs had shaved the heads of at least 20,000 women. The sources disagree on the numbers: Fenby says he commuted 998 of the 1,554 death sentences submitted to him and that 767 people were executed, while Jackson says he commuted 6,270 of the 7,037 death sentences pronounced. He spared Pétain and every condemned woman. He refused clemency to the writer Robert Brasillach, and to Pierre Laval, whose trial was a travesty. When Laval swallowed cyanide on the morning of his execution and was revived, de Gaulle asked only whether the last rites had been given. They had. "Then he no longer belongs to us," he said. "Let the firing squad do its duty."
Then, on Sunday, January 20, 1946, he walked into a Cabinet meeting in uniform and, before anyone sat down, resigned: "The exclusive regime of the political parties has reappeared. I disapprove of it. But, short of establishing by force a dictatorship which I do not want and which, doubtless, would turn out badly, I do not have the means of preventing this. I therefore have to retire." If he expected a groundswell to recall him, Jackson writes, "he was wrong: the French learned to live without him," and by leaving he lost the chance to shape the Fourth Republic's constitution. He later called the resignation "an error."
He formed a political movement, the Rally of the French People (RPF), in 1947. It took 38.7 per cent at that year's municipal elections and 120 seats in the 1951 National Assembly elections. Its stewards were rough, a Communist protester was killed at a Grenoble meeting in 1948, and Jackson finds de Gaulle's rhetoric of these years "both incendiary and reactionary," while insisting that he "never seriously called into question the commitment to democracy that he had inherited from the war." Then the deputies drifted away and de Gaulle lost interest in it. By 1953 only 1 per cent of voters wanted him back. By 1953, he had severed his connection with the RPF. In 1955, it was disbanded. He retired to his country house in Colombey-les-deux-Églises — a tiny village in the Champagne region, the name of which means "Colombey of the two churches" — and turned to his memoirs:
L'Appel, 1940–1942 (1954),
L'Unité, 1942–1944 (1956),
Le Salut, 1944–1946 (1959). The writing was extraordinary — Curtis Cate, in the
Atlantic, placed the war memoirs alongside
Julius Caesar's
De bello Gallico and Chateaubriand's
Mémoires d'outre-tombe. De Gaulle was creating his own legend, and doing it with prose of a quality that justified the effort. They have to be read as a primary source, written to keep him in the public eye: they are self-justifying, and silent on episodes that embarrassed him.
The one door he kept open was to his daughter Anne, born in 1928 with Down's syndrome. Her parents neither hid her nor thought of an institution. The man who would not be seen in pyjamas went down on all fours to play with her, and on manoeuvres before the war he had a car take him 140 kilometres each night to rock her in his arms. "For a father, believe me, it is a very great trial," he told his chaplain in 1940. "But for me, this child is also a blessing, she is my joy." She died in 1948 at twenty. Twenty-two years later he was buried in her grave at Colombey.
The Fourth Republic he had left behind was far more successful than is often allowed. But it came crashing down amid the horror of the impossible Algerian war.
Je Vous Ai Compris
On June 4, 1958, wearing army uniform, Charles de Gaulle stood before a crowd in Algiers and declared: "Je vous ai compris" — I have understood you. The vous was deliberately ambiguous. The settlers heard a promise that Algeria would remain French, though the rest of the speech promised Muslims equal rights and so the end of the settlers' privileges. The military men who had organized the quasi-coup that brought de Gaulle back to power heard confirmation that their man was in charge. Everyone heard what they needed to hear. It was the single most consequential act of political ventriloquism in twentieth-century French history.
The background: in 1954, Algeria's National Liberation Front — the F.L.N. — had begun a guerrilla war for independence. By 1958, the war had lasted four years, consumed the Fourth Republic's energies, and radicalized a group of right-wing French military officers who, alarmed by the government's failure to defeat the rebellion and worried that the million-strong community of French nationals in Algeria — the pieds noirs — would be abandoned, staged what amounted to a coup in Algiers on May 13, 1958. They formed a Committee of Public Safety and demanded that de Gaulle be given power.
De Gaulle made what Jackson calls "the first of three brilliantly calculated interventions": a seven-line communiqué on May 15 declaring himself ready to assume the powers of the Republic, which encouraged the putschists and sabotaged any compromise; a press conference to reassure Paris; and on May 27 a bluff, announcing that he had begun forming a government while another man was still Prime Minister. In secret he received General Salan's envoy, heard the plans for an airborne landing in France, Operation Resurrection, and sent him off with: "Tell Salan that what he has done and what he will do is for the good of France." Jackson's verdict is double-edged. De Gaulle imposed "his rhythm on events" through "a masterly combination of seduction, bluff and firmness," but "it remains likely that de Gaulle would, as a last resort, have accepted" Resurrection, and he "ran the risk of setting off a military coup or a civil war." President Coty called on "the most illustrious of Frenchmen," and on June 1 the Assembly invested him by 329 votes to 224. Michel Debré, his faithful disciple and a brilliant jurist, was put in charge of drafting the constitution. The result, approved by referendum in September 1958 with about 80 percent of the vote (78.25 per cent of those voting, by Fenby's count), was the Fifth Republic — a system that dramatically increased executive power at the expense of the National Assembly, created a presidency with real authority, and remains the constitutional framework of France today. On December 21, 1958, de Gaulle was elected president. On January 8, 1959, the Fifth Republic came into operation.
The Algerian crisis that brought him to power took another four years to resolve, and the resolution was devastating. Privately he had long said that "if we let the Algerians vote, they will vote for independence." Leaving, Fenby writes, took "all his genius for ambiguity, duplicity and improvisation." He stepped up the war while edging toward self-determination: a million Muslims herded into camps, torture increasing, then a televised offer of self-determination in 1959 and "Algerian Algeria" in 1960. When four generals seized Algiers in April 1961, he crushed the putsch on prime-time television, dismissing them as a quarteron ("a quartet of retired generals"): "I forbid every French person and, first of all, every soldier, to carry out any of their orders." Conscripts listened on transistor radios and stayed loyal. The Évian accords were approved by referendum in April 1962 with more than 90 percent of French voters in favor.
The O.A.S. — the Organisation de l'Armée Secrète, a settler terrorist organization — answered with bombs and repeated attempts on his life. At Petit-Clamart on August 22, 1962, gunmen put fourteen bullets into his car; he and his wife sat upright in the back, and at the airfield he said only: "This time, it was close." He refused clemency to the ringleader, Colonel Jean-Marie Bastien-Thiry, who was shot in March 1963. The costs of independence fell on others. A million settlers fled, allowed two suitcases each. A proposal for mass evacuation of the harkis, the Algerian Muslims who had fought for France, "was rejected by a committee presided over by de Gaulle," and estimates of the harkis killed in reprisals run from 10,000 to 30,000-80,000. Jackson notes that he "paid no tribute and offered no help" to them. Fenby's verdict is that the policy was "the manoeuvres of an extremely skilled politician operating on his own with a mixture of guile and ruthlessness," and he adds: "But he saved France from civil war."
The Technocrat in King's Robes
Beneath the sonorous grandiosity and medievalist rhetoric, de Gaulle's government was entirely technocratic and modernizing. This was the secret of the Fifth Republic — the paradox that makes it strange and interesting. The man who spoke of gloire and pageantry and a certain idea of France staffed his government with the graduates of the École Nationale d'Administration and the grandes écoles, the hyper-competent hautes fonctionnaires who actually ran the state. Michel Debré, his first Prime Minister, pursued with especial vigor many policies that were, in an age-old cycle, actually the policies of the much-maligned Fourth Republic.
The effects were both salubrious and infuriating: France became an extraordinarily well-run state, and an extraordinarily bureaucratic one. The Cabinet itself was silent and disciplined. Ministers could speak only on their own departments, and one called its meetings "funeral wakes with one difference: the corpse speaks."
De Gaulle's foreign policy was assertive, nationalist, and designed to demonstrate that France was not an American vassal. On March 7, 1966, he wrote to President Lyndon Johnson to announce France's withdrawal from NATO's integrated military command — while remaining a party to the Atlantic alliance itself. "France considers that the changes which have taken place since 1949," he wrote, with the formality of a man delivering a verdict, "… do not justify, so far as she is concerned, the arrangements of a military nature made after the conclusion of the Alliance." He ejected NATO forces from French soil. He developed nuclear weapons — the force de frappe. He blocked Britain's entry into the European Common Market. Twice. He lectured the Americans on Vietnam. He traveled to Canada in 1967 and shouted "Vive le Québec libre!" from the balcony of Montreal's city hall — an improvisation inspired by his absurd fantasy that Quebec, already becoming a multiethnic modern state, was still occupied by the English.
The system of military integration applied to the Atlantic Alliance, which in fact assigns to the United States the possible conduct of war in Europe, the employment of the forces that would take part in it, and the entire disposition of the atomic arms which would be the basic weapons, deprives France, her people, her Government, and her Command, of the responsibility for her own defense.
— Charles de Gaulle, letter to Dwight Eisenhower, August 9, 1960
He was maddening. He was also, on his own terms, right. Under de Gaulle's presidency, the French economy grew, the currency stabilized, and the country experienced a governmental stability greater than any living French citizen had known. The monuments of Paris were sandblasted under his and Malraux's orders, and the face of the city changed from grimy wartime black back to its original blue-gray and beige and white. It was as keenly symbolic of Gaullist triumph as any law or edict.
When Michel Debré started proceedings against Jean-Paul Sartre in 1960 for backing the F.L.N., de Gaulle had them dropped: "One does not imprison Voltaire."
The Counter-Demonstration
The flaw in the Fifth Republic as a political invention was structural and psychological. By concentrating so much power in one regal figure, de Gaulle made it possible to rule France again but also ensured that opposition would have to be impassioned and clamorous to register at all. Prime ministers, when they become unpopular, are eased out by their supporters. Kings, when they become unpopular, must be thrown out by a mob. Theatrical mini-revolutions became the norm in French politics.
The most famous of these erupted in May 1968. Student disorders at the Sorbonne on May 3 — a rally of student radicals that turned violent and was broken up by police — became a confrontation, then an occupation, then a nationwide conflagration. Barricades went up in the Latin Quarter. The unrest spread to factories. A wave of wildcat strikes rolled across France, involving millions of workers and virtually paralyzing the nation. It expressed so deep an impatience with Gaullism that it transformed France within a week.
De Gaulle seemed incapable of grasping the crisis. "This is a country which is disintegrating and I can do nothing about it," he told his aide Jacques Foccart on May 28. On May 29 he postponed the Cabinet and vanished, flying by helicopter, with almost no one told, to General Massu's headquarters at Baden-Baden in Germany. Whether this was despair or a final coup is still argued. Fenby records him telling his son-in-law beforehand: "I want to plunge the French, including the government, into a state of doubt and worry in order to be able to take control of the situation once again." Yet on Massu's lawn he said, "Everything is done for," and Massu told him he had to stay in the fight. Jackson sets out both readings and finds "The evidence is inconclusive." De Gaulle himself later admitted: "Yes! On 29 May I was tempted to retire." He returned the next day, dissolved parliament, and in a radio address — the medium he had mastered in 1940 — presented himself as the only barrier to anarchy or Communist rule: "No, the Republic will not abdicate. The people will pull themselves together."
Loyal Gaullists and nervous citizens rallied. On the Champs-Élysées, nearly a million people massed in a counter-demonstration — a reminder that the center of popular gravity in France remained on the right, even as its mind and imagination remained on the left. In elections held in June, the Gaullists and their Independent Republican allies won a landslide: 354 of the 487 seats in the National Assembly.
For all that, May 1968 seemed to exhaust him spiritually. He replaced Prime Minister Georges Pompidou — a man who had shown toughness and nerve during the crisis while the president had temporarily lost his bearings — with the less threatening Maurice Couve de Murville. Then, less than a year later, de Gaulle staked his presidency on an insignificant referendum on regional reform. It was a form of ritual political suicide.
On April 27, 1969, the amendments were defeated by a 53-to-47 percent margin. That night, de Gaulle silently abandoned his office and returned to the obscurity of his country estate.
The Perpetual Illusion
"In reality we are on the stage of a theatre where I have been keeping up the illusion since 1940," de Gaulle once told a confidant. "I am trying to give France the appearance of a solid, firm, confident and expanding country, while it is a worn-out nation. … The whole thing is a perpetual illusion."
A reasonable case can be made that it was all theater and hot air. The Allies would have retaken France with or without him, and some French politician would have walked down the Champs-Élysées in August 1944. France was going to surrender Algeria sooner or later; all de Gaulle did was extend the fight and put a noble face on the capitulation. By placing myth over history, he injected a toxic hallucinogen into French memory. It took decades for France to begin to address the reality of Vichy. On October 17, 1961, police under Maurice Papon, a wartime collaborator who served as de Gaulle's prefect of police, killed between thirty and fifty Algerian demonstrators in Paris by one expert count, a hundred or more by other reports. De Gaulle excused it as policemen wanting revenge for colleagues killed by the F.L.N. The pattern was older. At Sétif in May 1945, after Algerian marchers killed 102 Europeans, troops and aircraft massacred local people; Fenby puts the toll "probably around eight thousand," finds de Gaulle's own responsibility "impossible to establish," and notes that the memoirs give it three lines. When French troops fired on crowds in Damascus that same month, de Gaulle told the press it was "only several hundred people killed or injured." Fenby speaks of "the General's cold-blooded insistence on painting out of history anything that could hinder his resurrection of the state."
His ingratitude to the British, who had saved his life and given him a platform to save his country — an ingratitude that became almost obsessively bitter in his memoirs — is unforgivable, except as a reminder of the truth that we always resent most those to whom we owe most.
Yet to stop there is to miss the central lesson that de Gaulle intuited: myths matter. Without a sense of shared symbols, it is impossible for any modern state to go on. France is a frustrating state, but it has never been a failed one. It works. National dignity is hugely important to any program of national renewal.
De Gaulle was, for all that, a right-wing patriot in power who accepted the modern order. From a background that in most places and circumstances would have led, in crisis, toward some form of Bonapartism, he remained a faithful believer in the norms of democracy. He believed in a certain idea of France, but it was a republican idea of France.
He died on November 9, 1970, at Colombey-les-deux-Églises, two weeks before his eightieth birthday, of a ruptured aorta, while playing patience at his card table in the library. World leaders attended a memorial mass at Notre-Dame; at Colombey, three hundred Companions of the Liberation filled the village church, and he was buried beside Anne. His passing inspired a nearly worldwide chorus of praise, even from those who had been his most persistent critics. His name was placed on the great airport outside Paris, on the plaza once called the Étoile where traffic streams perpetually around the Arc de Triomphe. The traffic goes around all day but never stops for long.