The campaign was called the Pepsi Challenge, and its premise was as simple as a coin toss. Find a lifelong Coca-Cola drinker. Cover the labels. Pour two cups. Ask which one tastes better. On television the answer was always the same, and it was always Pepsi. The commercials ran hardest in Texas, where Pepsi's market share was weakest, and they worked: share in the state rose significantly. The executive who launched the campaign in 1975 was thirty-six years old, senior vice president of U.S. sales and marketing for the Pepsi-Cola Company, and five years earlier he had become the youngest marketing vice president in the company's history. The claim at the center of the campaign, that people preferred the taste of Pepsi, rested on his own research. He believed in research. He had built a career on it.
At some point, John Sculley took the test himself.
He picked Coke.
The story survives as a single line in Michael Malone's 1999 history of Apple, Infinite Loop. It has no setting, no date, no witness and no punchline. That suits it. It reads as a confession and a joke at once, and the people who have spent the most time on Sculley's career cannot agree which. Critics of the Challenge later argued that the blind test rewarded sweetness: Pepsi won the first sip because it was sweeter, not because it was better, and a sip is not a bottle and a bottle is not a habit. The man who designed the instrument seems to have understood this better than anyone. He also understood that it did not matter. The product was not the cola. The product was the moment in which a Coke loyalist, on camera, discovered that he had been wrong about himself. Sculley sold the experience of switching, not the liquid. Then, unobserved, he chose the incumbent anyway.
The rest of his life can be read through that cup. He was the youngest of everything and the founder of nothing. He married into one company's family and was told at another that he was "like one of the founders." He spent a decade as the challenger's general against a dominant rival, and at the end of it the rival had won. He saw the future earlier than almost anyone in Cupertino: the handheld, the voice assistant, the networked encyclopedia in a briefcase, a $3.5 trillion communications industry. He watched others ship it. He won the most consequential boardroom fight in the history of American technology and spent the next forty years being asked to apologize for winning.
The question the anecdote raises is the one his career keeps raising: what does the man who sells the challenger actually prefer? And how do you live once the blindfold comes off?
By the Numbers
The Sculley Decade
$982M → $7.9BApple's annual sales, 1983 to 1993, under Sculley
350Families in Pepsi's extended in-home test that led to bigger packages and the two-liter bottle
−$156.5M → +$40MPepsiCo's food division, from losses to profit, within three years of his arrival
$1.5MCost of the single national broadcast of Apple's '1984' commercial
$10.2MHis 1987 pay, the highest of any Silicon Valley executive that year
$2BCash on Apple's balance sheet when he left (against $200M in debt)
6.5M → 1Apple shares Steve Jobs held before and after his 1985 sell-off
Marrying Into the Second Brand
He was born John Sculley III on April 6, 1939, in New York City. His father, John Sculley Jr., was a Wall Street lawyer. His mother, Margaret Blackburn Smith, was a horticulturist: one parent in the business of contracts, the other in the business of making things grow. He and his brothers spent much of their childhood in Bermuda before the family returned to New York, and he finished secondary school at St. Mark's in Southborough, Massachusetts. Even this early, his trajectory had the coastal, slightly offshore quality of a man raised near the center of American power but not quite in it.
At fourteen, he told the New York Times in 1983, he invented a color television cathode ray tube and applied for patents. He said his idea was narrowly beaten by another application, the one that became the basis of Sony's Trinitron. The claim is his own, and the paper printed it without comment. It is the first appearance of a pattern: Sculley at the edge of the breakthrough, close enough to name it, one filing behind. He went on to Brown, where he studied architectural design, and then to Wharton for an MBA. An architect who became a marketer is someone who learned to think about how people move through a space before he learned to think about what they buy in it. The order matters.
In 1960, still a student, he married Ruth, the stepdaughter of Donald M. Kendall. Kendall would become chairman and chief executive of PepsiCo, and he is the fixed point around which the first half of Sculley's career turns. He ran the company Sculley would help transform. He held the title Sculley was later popularly, and wrongly, credited with. When Sculley left in 1983, Kendall issued the gracious farewell statement. He was family, then not family, then the boss. The marriage produced two children and ended in 1965.
Sculley had started in advertising in 1963 at Marschalk Co. in New York; the Times would later summarize that period simply as Interpublic. In 1967, two years after the divorce, he joined the Pepsi-Cola division of his former stepfather-in-law's company as a trainee. One wants to know what that interview was like. The record is silent.
What the record does contain is Pittsburgh. Sculley's first assignment was a six-month training program at a bottling plant, among syrup lines and glass and the trucks that carried the product to grocery stores. It was a strange apprenticeship for a Brown architecture graduate, and also exactly the right one. The cola business was a distribution business with an advertising budget attached, and the bottler's floor was where the abstraction became physical.
Pepsi in 1967 was the second-largest soft drink company in the country. Second matters here. Every subsequent chapter of Sculley's career is set inside a challenger, and every enemy is an incumbent with a stronger brand and a more conservative culture. In 1978 he married again. Carol Lee Adams, called Leezy, was the ex-wife of a former PepsiCo vice president. The company had become something like a village, and Sculley had married into it twice.
The Living Room Was the Laboratory
In 1970, at thirty, Sculley became Pepsi's youngest-ever marketing vice president. That same year the company set out, deliberately and expensively, to dethrone Coca-Cola, and the conflict acquired its name, the Cola Wars. The scale of the bet is the important fact. Most consumer companies of the era paid somewhere between $15,000 and $75,000 to produce a television spot. Pepsi routinely paid between $200,000 and $300,000. The Pepsi Generation campaign was built to overturn Coca-Cola's classic, timeless, small-town iconography with something younger and more kinetic. It was a declaration that the second brand would no longer behave like a second brand.
Sculley's contribution was to put a measuring device inside the American kitchen. He initiated one of the company's first serious consumer-research studies, an extended in-home product test in which 350 families took part. The finding was almost banal. Families did not drink as much soda as they wanted. They drank as much as they had in the house. Consumption expanded to fill the container. Pepsi responded with new, larger and more varied packages, including the two-liter bottle, which Sculley developed with DuPont. A generation of refrigerators was rearranged around a plastic bottle whose real purpose was to remove the moment of running out.
This is the Sculley method in its purest form, before it had a name. Don't ask what people say they want. Watch what they do with what they have, and change the shape of the thing so that the behavior you want becomes the default. It is an architect's insight wearing a marketer's clothes.
In 1974 he was sent to fix something that wasn't selling. PepsiCo's international food business was the conglomerate's only money-losing division: revenues of $83 million, losses of $156.5 million. Sculley had visited a failing potato-chip factory in Paris shortly before he was named president of International Food Operations. What he did there is described in his memoir in terms that are almost deliberately unglamorous. He improved product quality, built up the accounts, and established financial controls. There was no campaign and no slogan. Within three years the division was producing $300 million in revenue and $40 million in profit. The marketer's reputation was made by a controller's work, and he never stopped believing that the two were the same discipline.
Then came the Challenge. Sculley returned to the domestic business as senior vice president of U.S. sales and marketing and launched the campaign in 1975, aiming it at Texas, where Pepsi's position was weakest. The strategy was a jiu-jitsu of the incumbent's strength. Coca-Cola's advantage was loyalty, which is a story people tell about themselves. The blind test went after the story. It did not argue that Pepsi was better. It staged, on camera, the collapse of a loyal customer's certainty. A brand cannot advertise its way out of that, because the doubt is planted in the viewer, not on the screen.
In 1977 Sculley became president of the Pepsi-Cola Company, the youngest in its history. Contrary to decades of profiles, including the one that made him famous, he was never PepsiCo's chief executive; Kendall held that job. By 1982 the Pepsi-Cola Company accounted for roughly $2 billion of PepsiCo's $7.5 billion in revenue and was the conglomerate's largest and most profitable division. "He's gotten Pepsi back on track," a Montgomery Securities analyst named Emanual Goldman told the Times. The judgment was compressed, accurate, and a little dull, which is how Wall Street praises a man it expects to stay put.
He did not stay put.
Sugared Water
To understand why Apple wanted a soft-drink executive in 1983, you have to understand how frightened Apple was. It was the frightened, overconfident fear of a company that had believed its own myth for six years.
Mike Markkula is the quiet hinge of the story. He was a millionaire out of Fairchild Semiconductor who had been introduced to the two Steves by the venture capitalist Don Valentine, who had himself declined to invest. Markkula put in $92,000 of his own money, secured a $250,000 line of credit from Bank of America, and took a one-third stake in a company whose product, the idea of a computer for ordinary people, banks still considered absurd. In February 1977 he recruited Michael Scott from National Semiconductor to be Apple's first president, because neither founder was ready and Markkula himself did not want the job. In 1981 he took it anyway, reluctantly. By early 1983 he was forty-one, wanted out, and believed that Steve Jobs, who wanted the presidency, lacked the discipline and temperament to run a public company day to day.
The company Markkula wanted to hand off had some real trouble. IBM had entered the personal computer market in August 1981. Apple's response had been a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal headlined "Welcome, IBM. Seriously," which in retrospect reads like a man waving at an oncoming train. Bill Gates had been at Apple headquarters the day IBM announced. "They didn't seem to care," he said later. "It took them a full year to realize what had happened." By 1983 the IBM PC had overtaken the Apple II as the best-selling personal computer. The Apple III had overheated so badly that customer service told owners to lift their machines and drop them so the chips would reseat. The Lisa, which Jobs had led until he was removed from the project, shipped in January 1983 at $9,995, absorbed more than $150 million in development and sold about 10,000 units. A Fortune survey found that 56 percent of American companies with personal computers used IBM machines and 16 percent used Apple's. The analysts expected IBM, "known for its strong marketing," as the Times put it, to become the largest seller of personal computers that year.
Strong marketing. That was the diagnosis, and Pepsi was where you went for the cure.
Steve Jobs's biography compresses into a few facts that rhyme almost too neatly with the man he went to recruit. He was the adopted son of Paul Jobs, a high-school dropout who worked as a machinist and a repossession agent and built his boy a workbench in the garage. He dropped out of Reed after one semester and kept auditing classes, including a calligraphy course that he would later credit with the Mac's proportionally spaced fonts. During that stretch, by his own account, he slept on friends' dorm-room floors and returned Coke bottles for food money. The future recruiter of the president of Pepsi once survived on Coca-Cola's deposit refunds. Neither man seems to have commented on it.
The two met in 1982. The courtship went on for months, and its conclusion became the most quoted recruiting line in American business:
Do you want to sell sugared water for the rest of your life? Or do you want to come with me and change the world?
— Steve Jobs, to John Sculley, 1983
The line is usually taken as Jobs's genius for seduction, and it was that. It was also an insult delivered as an invitation, and it worked because it put words to something Sculley already half-believed about himself. A man who had picked Coke in his own blind test did not need to be told that his career rested on a preference he didn't fully share. He needed to be told that a better cup existed.
On April 8, 1983, Apple named him president and chief executive. He was forty-four. The package was large for its time: $1 million a year in salary and bonus, a $1 million signing bonus, and options on what Sculley coyly described as "quite a few hundred thousand shares" (350,000, by later accounts). Jobs stayed on as chairman. Markkula stayed on the board to work on long-range planning and a research lab. Sculley told the Times that he had no computer experience and did not think it would be a drawback "as long as Apple retained its technical people." The sentence is gracious, sensible, and a quiet prediction of his own vulnerability. A CEO who depends on others to understand the product has handed those others a veto.
The same day, PepsiCo announced that his departure had "accelerated the implementation" of a reorganization into a single worldwide beverage group. Roger Enrico would run domestic sales and marketing. Kendall's statement praised Sculley as "an extremely capable executive" who had "earned the respect and admiration of everyone in the Pepsico family." The word family was doing more work than any reader of the business page could have known.
Asked about IBM, Sculley gave the answer that would become his thesis for the next decade:
I.B.M. is a formidable competitor. But so is Coca-Cola.
— John Sculley, to The New York Times, April 1983
Founding the Future
For a year and a half it was a romance. Both men later called the partnership "amazing," and the word fits the record better than most later accounts allow. Sculley's first contribution was unglamorous and essential: he used his marketing experience to keep the aging Apple II selling. The II was the company's cash. It paid for everything Jobs was building in the Macintosh building, where Jobs, having taken the project from Jef Raskin while Wozniak was recovering from a plane crash, made every product decision as its executive product manager.
The first real collision between Sculley's discipline and Jobs's dream was over a number. The Macintosh had been planned at $1,995. In late 1983, in what Andy Hertzfeld's folklore of the Mac team records as a price fight, Sculley pushed it to $2,495. The extra five hundred dollars per machine would go to higher margins and to advertising, a lot of advertising. It was the Pepsi playbook applied to silicon: the cola had cost more to advertise than any rival's, and so would the computer. The higher price also put the Mac further out of reach of the students and creative amateurs who were its natural audience, and the argument over whether Sculley had protected the product or crippled it has never been settled.
The advertising was historic. On January 22, 1984, during the third quarter of Super Bowl XVIII, Apple ran a single national broadcast of a commercial directed by Ridley Scott. It cost $1.5 million to air. A heroine ran through a gray hall of shaven-headed drones and threw a hammer through the screen of a lecturing Big Brother, and a voice announced that on January 24 Apple would introduce Macintosh, "and you'll see why 1984 won't be like 1984." There was no computer in it. There was barely a product. It was all experience: the feeling of being the one who throws the hammer. Regis McKenna, Apple's early marketing adviser, later said the ad was "more successful than the Mac itself," which was meant as praise and works as an epitaph.
Two days later, at the annual shareholders' meeting in the Flint Auditorium at De Anza College, an emotional Jobs pulled the machine out of a bag and let it speak for itself. Hertzfeld called the scene "pandemonium." Around that moment, at a rehearsal for the introduction, Jobs said something to Sculley that Sculley would carry for the rest of his life:
I think of you just like Woz and Markkula. You're like one of the founders of the company. They founded the company, but you and I are founding the future.
— Steve Jobs, to John Sculley, at the Macintosh introduction rehearsal, 1984
Like one of the founders. The simile holds the whole tragedy. A founder can be pushed aside and remain a founder. Someone who is like a founder only keeps the title as long as the founder keeps offering it.
Sculley spent the rest of 1984 trying to turn a cult object into a mass product, with the tools that had always worked for him. For a special post-election issue of Newsweek that November, Apple paid more than $2.5 million to buy all thirty-nine advertising pages. It ran a promotion called "Test Drive a Macintosh," which let anyone with a credit card take a Mac home for twenty-four hours and return it to a dealer. Two hundred thousand people did. This was the Pepsi Challenge in beige plastic, the blind sip moved into the living room, the 350-family study run at scale with the customer's own furniture as the lab. It was a remarkable piece of experience marketing. It was also a logistical disaster. Dealers disliked it, supply ran short, and many machines came back too battered to resell.
Years later Sculley described a conversation with Jobs in which Jobs asked how he had done it at Pepsi, with "no money to speak of," and how he had passed Coca-Cola. "Well," Sculley said he replied, "we call it experience marketing." The focus, he explained, was on selling the experience, not the product. Pepsi never actually passed Coke in total sales, and the anecdote sits in his public record with an asterisk. The philosophy needs no asterisk. It is the most accurate one-line description of his career anyone has written, and he wrote it.
The trouble was that the product could not hold up its end of the experience. The Mac was slow, it had too little memory, and software was scarce, because developers had to rewrite their programs around a graphical interface. Sales that had started strong fell sharply in the second half of 1984. Apple tried to move unsold Lisas by renaming them the Macintosh XL and positioning them as a top-of-the-line professional Mac, a relabeling stunt that only a marketer could love. In January 1985 Apple launched Macintosh Office with an ad that showed blindfolded businesspeople marching off a cliff like lemmings. It insulted the very customers it was meant to win. The blindfold motif, which had served Sculley so well in Texas, had come back wrong.
Containment
By early 1985 Apple was two companies sharing a lobby. The Apple II division, which still produced 85 percent of sales, and the Macintosh division, which Jobs ran as general manager while also serving as chairman of the board, operated like separate firms and duplicated each other's services. Sculley was nominally above both. In practice he had little control over Jobs's division, because Jobs was his boss's boss and his own subordinate at the same time.
At the January 1985 annual meeting, the Apple II division and its employees went unmentioned. Some of them left, and so did the man whose name was on the original machine. Steve Wozniak's life fits in a few sentences. As a young engineer he built illegal "blue boxes" that could make free long-distance calls and tested one by phoning the Vatican while pretending to be Henry Kissinger. He designed the Apple I and the Apple II essentially by himself, and when the company went public he offered $10 million of his own stock to early employees, something Jobs refused to do. In spring 1985 he left active employment, saying the company had "been going in the wrong direction for the last five years," and sold most of his shares. He left amicably. He was always the founder who could walk away without losing the title.
Jobs was harder to handle. In the months before the break, he became what accounts of the era call "non-linear": he kept meetings running past midnight, sent out long faxes, then called new meetings for 7:00 a.m. The board instructed Sculley to "contain" him and to limit his ability to launch expensive forays into untested products. The verb is military and also custodial, and it fit the problem exactly. The board had hired a professional to manage a prodigy, and now it was asking the professional to manage the prodigy out.
Arthur Rock pushed. Rock was the venture capitalist who had looked at the crowded Apple booth at an early computer show, put in $60,000, and taken a board seat, the kind of investor who trusts a line of people more than a pitch. In April 1985, with Rock's encouragement, Sculley decided to remove Jobs as general manager of the Macintosh group and move him to a role overseeing "New Product Development," which everyone involved understood to mean nothing. The board backed the move unanimously.
Jobs did not accept it. He began organizing to remove Sculley. The plan leaked. Jean-Louis Gassée, the Frenchman who ran Apple's operations in France and was then rising in the company, told Sculley. Sculley called an emergency meeting of the executive staff, they sided with him, and Jobs was stripped of all operational duties. He stayed chairman in name. On September 17, 1985, he submitted his resignation, and five senior Apple employees left with him to start NeXT.
He then did something that functions as a perfect, private image of the whole affair. He sold all but one of his 6.5 million Apple shares, for about $70 million. He kept one share. One share is not an investment. It is a receipt, and it gave him the right to read the annual report, attend the meeting, and stay in the room.
In 2015 Sculley said Jobs never forgave him and that their friendship was never repaired. Every later account of the episode, including three feature films that cast Allan Royal, Matthew Modine and Jeff Daniels in his role, would treat it as the moment the suit killed the visionary. The record is less tidy. The board instructed. The board voted. The executives chose. Sculley found out about the coup from someone else, called the meeting, and won. He was the instrument of a decision the institution had already half-made. That was exactly what he had been hired to be, and being that instrument was his crime.
The Golden Age and Its Invoice
The years after the coup were the best of Sculley's life, and the numbers back that up.
He reorganized the company along functional lines, with sales and marketing unified in one division and product operations and development in another, and folded the two rival kingdoms into one company. Fiscal 1986 revenue was essentially flat at $1.9 billion, but net income more than doubled, from $61 million to $154 million. By April 1986 a Montreal columnist was writing that "since Sculley joined the company … many things have changed," and that his "strategy has worked." Wozniak, who had no reason to flatter him, credited Sculley with the Mac's eventual success: he "worked to build a Macintosh market when the Apple II went away."
The market he built was not the one Jobs had imagined. Sculley gave up the idea of the Mac as a frontal assault on IBM's corporate base and found the niches where Apple's interface was a real advantage. The most important one was desktop publishing. The partnership with Adobe produced the LaserWriter, one of the first commercially successful laser printers, with Adobe's PostScript built in, and Aldus PageMaker became the first commercially successful desktop publishing software. Within a few years the Mac was the default machine in advertising, publishing, music and film. The industries most like the one Sculley came from adopted the computer he had learned to sell.
On May 11, 1987, Apple paid its first dividend. On June 16 its stock split two-for-one for the first time. That year Sculley was the highest-paid executive in Silicon Valley, at $10.2 million. In August, Harper & Row published his memoir, written with the
BusinessWeek journalist John A. Byrne:
Odyssey: Pepsi to Apple … A Journey of Adventure, Ideas, and the Future, 560 pages at $21.95. It is an unusual book for a sitting CEO. It is candid about the coup, earnest about management, and it ends with an epilogue describing a product that did not exist, the Knowledge Navigator, a talking, networked, tablet-like assistant. The
Los Angeles Times reviewed it alongside a new Jobs biography under the headline "Third Wave Wipeout." That September he gave
Playboy an interview in which he predicted that the Soviet Union would put a man on Mars within twenty years and that optical storage like the CD-ROM would revolutionize personal computing. He was wrong about the first and right about the second.
The product line grew into a real family. The Mac Plus arrived in 1986, the SE and the Mac II in 1987, and the Classic and the LC in 1990. The Macintosh Portable of 1989 was a bulky failure, and Sculley learned from it: in 1991 Apple introduced the PowerBook, which set the basic form and ergonomic layout of the modern laptop. System 7, also from 1991, added color and networking and remained the architectural basis of the Mac operating system for a decade, until 2001. Between March 1988 and January 1989 Apple bought five companies. Revenue went from $1.9 billion in 1986 to $4.1 billion in 1988 to $5.3 billion in 1989. MacAddict later named 1989 through 1991 the "first golden age" of the Macintosh.
The bill for the golden age arrived in installments.
The first had been signed in 1985, in the turmoil after Jobs left. Microsoft threatened to stop developing Mac applications unless Apple licensed parts of the Mac's graphical interface for a product Microsoft was building for DOS, called Windows. The Mac was a hard sell without Microsoft's software. Under that pressure Sculley agreed, and the license later weighed heavily in Apple's failed copyright suit against Microsoft. It was a rational decision, made fast, under duress, by a man who did not yet know which parts of the company were its crown jewels. The interface was the crown jewel. He licensed it to save the applications.
The second installment was Windows 3.0. By the early 1990s cheap IBM-compatible PCs had an interface good enough that the Mac's most obvious advantage was taken for granted. Apple answered with a flood of Macintosh lines: Quadra, Centris, Performa, separated by small differences in specifications and arbitrary model numbers that confused customers and undercut Apple's reputation for simplicity. Resellers like Sears and CompUSA often couldn't sell them, or even display them properly. Inventory piled up as Apple underestimated demand for popular models and overestimated it for others. One later account called Apple in this period "arguably one of the worst-managed companies in the industry." The 350-family study had taught Sculley that more packages meant more consumption. Computers are not cola. Each new package diluted the experience instead of extending it.
Profit margins tell the rest of the story. In fiscal 1988 Apple earned 10 cents on every dollar of sales. By 1991 it earned 5. Regis McKenna offered the period's best epigram: "Apple is a lot like Italy. It's a highly creative company, but with that comes chaos."
The Navigator
The Knowledge Navigator was a 1987 concept video and the subject of Odyssey's epilogue. It showed a professor talking to a folding, book-like device with an on-screen agent that took his calls, pulled up research from distant databases, and kept his calendar. Some of it arrived in the 1990s through the internet and the web. Some arrived in 2011, when Apple shipped Siri on the iPhone 4S. Sculley was CEO of a personal computer company, and his most durable gift to it was a film about a product the company would not ship for twenty-four years.
On December 5, 1992, he gave the keynote at the first Harvard/MIT Communications 2000 Symposium, to a packed Burden Auditorium at Harvard Business School. The title alone shows how far ahead he was looking: "The Dawn of a $3.5 Trillion Communications Mega-Industry: Information Access, Processing and Distribution in a Digital World." The student-run conference later became the Harvard Business School Tech Club's annual Cyberposium. He coined the term personal digital assistant for a device Apple was building, called the Newton, and the phrase outlived the product by decades.
He also killed the product that might have been better. Inside Apple a small team led by Paul Mercer, with applications by Samir Arora, had built a hand-held pen tablet called PenMac. Sculley canceled it and instead signed an agreement with Sharp Electronics to develop Newton technology. In a 2003 interview with CNET he talked openly about his mistakes with the Newton and with HyperCard. By 1993, according to Fortune, he was focused on the Newton and uninterested in the rest of the company. A CEO who has fallen in love with one product has stopped being a CEO.
His largest bet was on the chip. In 1991 Apple joined its old enemy IBM and Motorola in the AIM alliance to build a new computing platform, and Sculley led the move of the Mac operating system to the PowerPC processor. Years later he called it his greatest mistake. He should, he said, have moved Apple to the dominant Intel architecture. The PowerPC was elegant, and it was a minority platform. Choosing it repeated the original Mac decision: build a better world and hope the market moves in. The market did not move.
Then there was the question every challenger eventually faces: do you sell the recipe? Sculley opposed licensing the Macintosh software to other manufacturers. At the same time, according to later accounts, he was talking with Goldman Sachs about splitting Apple into two companies. A man who won't franchise the brand but will break up the company has a theory, but it is a hard one to explain to a board. After a bad first quarter in 1993, amid a PC price war and internal fights over direction, the board forced him out. Michael Spindler replaced him as chief executive. Spindler was German-born and had been chief operating officer, a dense, hardworking operator who inherited a company without a story and was ousted three years later. Sculley resigned the chairmanship on October 15, 1993, and Markkula took it back. Sculley left Apple with $2 billion in cash and $200 million in debt. In fiscal 1993 the company sold $7.98 billion of computers and kept $87 million, about one cent per dollar.
In the same year he left he had been near the center of national politics. He had hosted a fundraiser at his ranch in Woodside for Tom Campbell, a Republican running in California's 1992 Senate primary. He had served with Hillary Clinton on a national education council and then backed Bill Clinton for president. At the new President's first State of the Union, John Sculley sat next to the First Lady. It was the most public seat he would ever occupy, and he held it in the year he lost his company.
What happened after he left should be read as a sequence of vindications. Each one was delivered by someone else.
In 1995 Apple began licensing the Mac OS to clone makers, the move Sculley had resisted. The "Clonintoshes" cut into Apple's own sales. That same year the CFO, Jim Graziano, asked the board to find a buyer because the company was no longer financially viable, and quit when the board said no. In February 1996 Fortune wrote that "the company that invented the personal computer will likely disappear." Markkula, negotiating with Sun, admitted that since 1986 Apple had held serious discussions about combining with DEC, Kodak, Sony, Sun, Compaq, IBM "and other companies I'd rather not name now." That month, from NeXT, Jobs offered his own diagnosis: "If I were running Apple, I would milk the Macintosh for all it's worth — and get busy on the next great thing. The PC wars are over. Done. Microsoft won a long time ago."
On December 20, 1996, Apple agreed to buy NeXT for $429 million and 1.5 million shares, and Jobs came back through the door Sculley had shown him out of. He killed the clone program. In March 1998 he killed the Newton. In 2005 he announced that the Mac would move to Intel, the transition Sculley had called his own greatest missed opportunity. In 2011 the iPhone 4S shipped with Siri. By then the Knowledge Navigator was simply a feature.
The Afterlife of a Name
A former Apple CEO in 1993 had one asset that appreciated faster than any stock: his name. Sculley spent the next three decades learning what it cost to spend it.
The first test came almost at once. He became chairman and chief executive of Spectrum Information Technologies, a New York company that held key patents for wireless data transmission, which was a reasonable bet for the man who had coined personal digital assistant. Four months later he resigned and sued Spectrum's president, Peter Caserta, for more than $10 million, claiming he had been misled about SEC inquiries and "aggressive revenue recognition accounting" for license fees. The Los Angeles Times headline called it an "unusual turn." Unusual was a kind word for a chief executive learning about his company's accounting from regulators.
What followed is a long, uneven ledger that does not reduce to a verdict. From 1995 to 2005 he was a partner at Sculley Brothers LLC, a family investment firm. Bermuda had produced a set of brothers, and they stayed in business together. He was a founding investor in MetroPCS, formerly General Wireless, and helped guide its brand marketing as it became a multibillion-dollar company on the New York Stock Exchange before T-Mobile acquired it in 2013. He helped build NFO Research from $25 million to $550 million in revenue before it was sold to Interpublic for $850 million. That is the company where, by the Times's accounting, he had started out in the advertising business three decades earlier. He helped launch or advised Hotwire.com, Buy.com, PeoplePC, and IntraLinks, which his brother Arthur co-founded.
In 1997 he became chairman of Live Picture, a California company working on high-quality, low-bandwidth internet imaging, backed by $22 million in venture money. He left, stayed an investor, and in 1999 Live Picture filed for bankruptcy protection as part of its sale to MGI Software. Also in 1997 he co-founded PopTech with Bob Metcalfe, the Ethernet inventor, and others, an ideas conference in Camden, Maine, where he spoke every year but one, 2005, for years afterward. Speaking about the future is a job that never ships a product.
In 2000 he started Signature21 with Dennis M. Lynch to sell marketing services to small and medium-sized businesses. A year later they turned it into a learning program for aspiring entrepreneurs, and months after that Lynch left. Sculley kept consulting and joined the board of InPhonic, an online seller of cell phones and wireless plans. As vice chairman he helped steer it to a successful IPO in 2004. It went bankrupt in 2007.
In 2002 he endorsed and invested in the Wine Clip, a wine accessory that claimed to speed up aeration by exposing wine to magnets. I put this in not to mock it, though it nearly mocks itself. It belongs in the story because it is the Pepsi Challenge at the end of its logic: a product made entirely of an experience, the expectation of a better sip, with almost nothing inside. The man who once ran a blind test that people questioned had lent his name to a gadget that could only have failed one.
Other roles were more serious. In 2003 he helped found Verified Person, an online pre-employment screening company. In 2004 he joined the board of OpenPeak, which made software for wireless consumer devices, and became a venture partner at Rho Ventures. In March 2006 he was named chairman of IdenTrust, a San Francisco company focused on verifying identity. The man who sold experiences was now in the business of proving that people were who they said they were.
The most durable bet was Zeta. In 2007 he co-founded a data company with David A. Steinberg, an entrepreneur who would become its long-running chief executive. In January 2014 the analytics firm XL Marketing was relaunched as Zeta Interactive, a "Big Data-Driven Marketing firm." On January 30, 2014, Sculley sat on a panel Zeta organized with ad executives and an NFL executive to talk about how marketing had changed since a 1984 Super Bowl commercial in which no computer appeared. By 2015 reports put the company's value near $1 billion. In 2016 it became Zeta Global, and in June 2025 he retired from its board. The data company was the 350-family study finally run at the scale he always wanted, every household and every sip, measured.
The same year Zeta became Zeta Interactive, he published a book of strategy,
Moonshot!: Game-Changing Strategies to Build Billion-Dollar Businesses, and co-founded Obi Mobiles, a smartphone brand for emerging markets, later renamed Obi Worldphone. Its first phones sold for under $250, and the trade press led with his name. In September 2017 he distanced himself from the company and said his name had been used for PR only. The Indian business press began putting "founded" in quotation marks. For a man whose title at Apple had always carried an implied
like, it was a bitter typographic echo.
He found another second act in health care, at RxAdvance, a cloud platform for helping pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and insurers manage chronically ill patients living at home. It was a field he had never worked in. He had once said that lacking computer experience would not hurt him as long as the company kept its technical people.
In 2011 his marriage to Leezy ended after thirty-three years. In 2013 he married Diane Gibbs Poli, a vice president and design coordinator at a building company, and they settled in Palm Beach. Bermuda had produced him. Florida would keep him. Both are islands, more or less, close to American power and slightly offshore from it.
Kyoto
One more restaurant belongs in this story, and Sculley never set foot in it.
Steve Jobs had refused to meet his biological father. Abdulfattah Jandali was a Syrian-born political scientist who had left teaching for the restaurant business, and at one point he managed a Mediterranean place near San Jose. When Jobs's sister Mona Simpson tracked him down, Jandali told her that all the successful technology people used to come in. "Even Steve Jobs," he said. "He used to come in, and he was a sweet guy and a big tipper." Jobs remembered it too. He had been there a few times and had met the owner. "He was Syrian. Balding. We shook hands." Neither man knew. It was a blind test of the most painful kind: two men in the same room, one gesture between them, and the truth that would have changed everything kept under the cup.
Jobs died on October 5, 2011. Sculley was seventy-two. In the years after, he talked about Jobs more and more: the founding, the coup, the unforgiveness. He talked the way people do about a preference they had acted against and could no longer change.
In 2016, on a visit to Japan, he walked into a sushi restaurant, by the account of the broadcaster that later reported it the one in Kyoto that Jobs had loved, and saw Steve Jobs's autograph. He broke down in tears. The owner remembered what he said. Since the two of them were retired from the front lines of business, they could have enjoyed sushi at Steve's favorite restaurant and had a good time together. But Steve had passed away, and now he was in heaven.
Picture two men at a counter in Kyoto, one of them in the conditional tense. There was the signature, unmistakably Jobs's, and the man who had once poured two unmarked cups and picked the one he wasn't supposed to sitting in front of it, with nothing left to choose.