Skip to content
Faster Than Normal
Military & Conflict

Trench War

Model #0819Category: Military & ConflictDepth to apply:

By Updated

4 min read

Contents

  1. 1. Core Idea
  2. 2. How to See It
  3. 3. How to Use It
  4. 4. Founders & Leaders
  5. 5. Connected Models
  6. 6. One Key Quote
  7. 7. Summary & Further Reading
Military & Conflict
Section 1

Core Idea

Trench warfare describes a competitive stalemate where both sides are deeply entrenched in their positions, neither able to gain meaningful ground, and every advance comes at enormous cost. In World War I, trenches created static front lines where massive offensives gained yards at the cost of thousands of lives. In business, trench warfare emerges when competitors have similar products, similar costs, and similar distribution — and every attempt to gain share triggers an equivalent response that restores the status quo. The core idea: when both sides are equally fortified, direct assault is wasteful. The winner is whoever finds a way to change the game entirely.

Get Faster Than Normal by email

Ideas from founders and companies.

Free newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Or open the full subscribe page.

Section 2

How to See It

Market Dynamics
You're seeing Trench War when competitors match each other's pricing, features, and marketing spend move for move — market share barely shifts despite enormous investment from both sides.
Industry Structure
You're seeing Trench War when an industry's profit margins compress as competitors spend more and more to maintain the same positions — everyone is fighting harder for the same ground.
Section 3

How to Use It

Recognise when you're in a trench war and stop investing in frontal assaults. Instead, look for flanking moves — new market segments, different business models, technological shifts, or adjacent markets where the trenches don't exist. The way out of trench warfare is innovation, not escalation.
Decision filter
"Are we spending more to maintain the same position? If competitive moves are increasingly expensive with diminishing returns, we're in a trench war. Stop escalating and start innovating around the stalemate."
As a founder
If every competitive move triggers an equal and opposite reaction and your market share hasn't budged in quarters, you're in a trench war. Stop fighting harder on the same front. Invest that energy in finding a completely different angle of attack that the competitor can't or won't match.
Section 5

Founders & Leaders

Phil KnightCo-founder & CEO, Nike
Knight faced trench warfare against Adidas and Reebok throughout the 1980s and 1990s — competitors with similar products fighting for the same retail shelf space and athlete endorsements. Rather than continuing to escalate on the same fronts, Knight flanked the trench by transforming Nike from a shoe company into a lifestyle brand. The "Just Do It" campaign, the Air Jordan partnership, and Nike's move into apparel and culture shifted competition from product features to brand identity — a front where Nike's storytelling and athlete relationships gave it structural advantages competitors couldn't match with incremental product improvements. Founders stuck in trench wars should look for Knight's lesson: change the dimension of competition entirely.
Section 7

Connected Models

Reinforces
Attrition Warfare
Attrition warfare is the grinding dynamic within trench war — each side wearing the other down through sustained, costly engagement. Trench war is the strategic stalemate; attrition warfare is the tactical reality within it.
Reinforces
Defense in Depth
Defense in depth creates the conditions for trench war by making positions hard to take. When both sides have deep defences, neither can achieve breakthrough, and the conflict becomes a stalemate of mutual fortification.
Tension
Status Quo Bias
Status quo bias keeps companies fighting trench wars because the familiar stalemate feels safer than the uncertainty of changing strategy. The tension: breaking out of a trench war requires overcoming organisational inertia and the comfort of the known, even when the known is slowly destroying value.
Section 8

One Key Quote

"Competition is for losers."
— Peter Thiel
Section 11

Summary & Further Reading

Trench warfare is competitive stalemate where direct assaults are costly and ineffective because both sides are equally fortified. Stop escalating on the same front. The way out is flanking — new segments, different business models, or changed dimensions of competition. When you're in a trench war, the answer is innovation, not more resources on the same battlefield.

Why this matters next

mental modelsInertia

Trench War applied the Inertia mental model

mental modelsTrench War

Trench War applied the Trench War mental model

mental modelsDefense in Depth

Trench War applied the Defense in Depth mental model

mental modelsCost

Trench War applied the Cost mental model

mental modelsFortification

Trench War applied the Fortification mental model

mental modelsUncertainty

Trench War applied the Uncertainty mental model

Frequently asked questions

What is Trench War?

Trench War is a mental model used for better thinking and decision-making.

How do you apply Trench War?

To apply Trench War, identify situations where this framework is relevant, then use it as a lens to evaluate your options and decisions. The model is most useful when combined with other complementary mental models.

What category does Trench War fall under?

Trench War falls under the Military & Conflict category of mental models. Other models in this category can be found on the Military & Conflict hub page.

Why is Trench War important?

Trench War is important because it provides a structured way to think about problems that would otherwise be approached with intuition alone. Understanding this model helps you avoid common reasoning errors and make better decisions.

Continue exploring

AW

Mental model

Asymmetric Warfare

Conflict strategy where a weaker force uses unconventional tactics to neutralize

BL

Mental model

Blitzkrieg

A strategy of concentrated, rapid attack at the point of greatest vulnerability

FS

Mental model

Fabian Strategy

A strategy of attrition and delay — avoiding decisive battle to exhaust a strong

FW

Mental model

Fog of War

The fundamental uncertainty in any complex situation where incomplete informatio

M(

Mental model

Mission Command (Auftragstaktik)

A leadership framework where commanders specify intent and objectives but leave

MD

Mental model

Mutually Assured Destruction

A deterrence doctrine where both sides possess the capability to inflict unaccep

Get Faster Than Normal by email

Ideas from founders and companies.

Free newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Or open the full subscribe page.

Popular Mental Models

First Principles ThinkingOccam's RazorCircle of CompetenceInversionConfirmation BiasSecond-Order ThinkingDunning-Kruger EffectSurvivorship BiasPareto PrincipleOpportunity Cost