Part IThe Story
Two and a Half Seconds at Aunt Effie's Farm
On the afternoon of March 16, 1926, four people stood in a snow-crusted field on a farm in Auburn, Massachusetts, a couple of miles south of Worcester. The farm belonged to Effie Ward, a distant relative whom Robert Goddard called Aunt Effie. With Goddard were his wife, Esther, who was there to photograph; Henry Sachs, the machinist who ran his small shop at Clark University; and Percy Roope, an assistant professor in Clark's physics department. In front of them stood a spindly frame of pipes taller than a man. At the top sat a small combustion chamber and nozzle. Below it, shielded by an asbestos cone, were tanks of gasoline and liquid oxygen.
At about half past two, the igniter was lit and the release was pulled. For several seconds nothing seemed to happen except flame and a steady roar. Then the contraption lifted, slowly at first, then quickly, curved over to the left and slammed into the frozen ground 184 feet away. It had climbed 41 feet. The whole flight lasted about two and a half seconds. The lower half of the nozzle had burned away.
That evening, Goddard's diary entry was a few lines long and mostly logistics: who came out, what time they tried the rocket, how high and far it went. The next day he wrote more, recording that it had moved, once it cleared the frame, at the speed of an express train. He did not announce it. The first flight of a liquid-propellant rocket was reported to his sponsors, not the press, and its details were not published until his 1936 Smithsonian report.
That silence is the key to Goddard. He was a physicist of real originality and an experimenter of unusual patience, and between 1915 and 1941 he worked out, often before anyone else, most of the basic engineering of the modern rocket: efficient nozzles, liquid propellants, pumps, gyroscopic steering, multiple combustion chambers. He was also a man who had been publicly mocked by the country's most important newspaper, who guarded his work closely, and who preferred to fly a rocket before he would describe it. The combination produced a body of work that pointed straight at spaceflight, and a career whose influence was narrower than it might have been.
By the Numbers
Goddard's Rocketry Career
41 ftHeight of the first liquid-fuelled rocket flight, March 16, 1926
214U.S. patents credited to Goddard, 131 of them issued after his death
35Liquid-propellant rockets that left the ground in his tests, 1926–1941
~1.7 miPeak altitude of rocket L-13, his highest flight, March 26, 1937
$100,000Daniel Guggenheim's 1930 commitment to fund his work in New Mexico
$1MPatent-infringement settlement paid by the U.S. government in 1960
The Boy in the Cherry Tree
Robert Hutchings Goddard was born in Worcester, Massachusetts, on October 5, 1882, the only surviving child of Nahum Goddard and Fannie Hoyt Goddard. A younger brother died in infancy. The family moved to Boston when Robert was small, and his father, who worked for manufacturers and invented tools of his own, encouraged his curiosity: a telescope, a microscope, a subscription to Scientific American. When Robert was five, his father showed him how to build up static electricity by scuffing across the carpet, and the boy tried to use the effect to jump higher. It did not work, and his mother warned him that if it did he might float away and never come back.
He was a frail child. Stomach trouble, pleurisy, colds and bronchitis kept him home for long stretches, and he fell two years behind in school. He spent much of that time reading in the public library, watching birds from the porch and working on projects at home. At sixteen he tried to build a hydrogen balloon out of aluminium, keeping careful notes through five weeks of failure before concluding in his diary that the metal was too heavy. The note-keeping was already a habit; he would keep diaries and notebooks for the rest of his life.
In 1898 his mother contracted tuberculosis and the family moved back to Worcester. That year Goddard read H. G. Wells's The War of the Worlds, newly serialised, and the idea of travel between planets took hold of him. On the afternoon of October 19, 1899, he climbed a cherry tree behind the family barn with a saw and a hatchet to cut away dead limbs. Looking out over the fields to the east, he imagined a device that might rise all the way to Mars, and pictured how it would look ascending from the meadow at his feet.
— Robert H. Goddard, autobiographical notes, recalling October 19, 1899I was a different boy when I descended the tree from when I ascended for existence at last seemed very purposive.
He marked October 19 as his private "Anniversary Day" for the rest of his life. The mechanism he pictured in the tree — a whirling weight that would generate lift — was physically wrong, and he soon worked out why. What stayed was the direction.
Around the same time he read Newton's Principia and tested the third law himself with contraptions hung from rubber bands and floated on the brook behind the barn. He concluded that if anyone ever found a way to travel through space, it would come from physics and mathematics rather than from inspiration alone. When his health improved, he returned to school at nineteen as a sophomore at South High in Worcester, was twice elected class president and graduated in 1904 as valedictorian. His oration was titled "On Taking Things for Granted," and its closing line would later be quoted more than anything else he wrote.
— Robert H. Goddard, graduation oration, South High School, Worcester, 1904It has often proved true that the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow.
Worcester, Princeton and a Death Sentence
Goddard enrolled at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1904. The head of physics, A. Wilmer Duff, noticed him quickly and took him on as a laboratory assistant. As an undergraduate he published a proposal in Scientific American for stabilising aircraft with gyroscopes, and he began filling cloth-bound notebooks with ideas for reaching space: ion propulsion, solar energy, atomic energy. By 1909 he had concluded that chemical rockets were the practical answer, and on February 2 of that year he wrote his first note about a rocket burning liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen — still the most efficient chemical propellant pair.
He graduated from WPI in 1908, taught there for a year, and earned a master's degree (1910) and a doctorate in physics (1911) at Clark University, a small research university in Worcester. His chief instructor in graduate school was Arthur Gordon Webster, a founder of the American Physical Society. In 1912 he accepted a research fellowship at Princeton's Palmer Physical Laboratory. There, working on the effect of radio waves on insulators, he invented a vacuum tube oscillator whose patent would later matter in radio litigation. In his spare hours he used calculus to work out the motion of a rocket climbing vertically through gravity and air resistance. The result showed that surprisingly small starting masses could, in principle, reach great heights, provided exhaust left the rocket fast and most of the vehicle was propellant. He had independently arrived at the core of what is now called the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, and extended it to account for gravity and drag.
In early 1913 he fell seriously ill with tuberculosis and had to leave Princeton. His doctors did not expect him to live. He went home to Worcester and recovered slowly, walking outdoors for exercise. When he was allowed to work an hour a day, he spent it turning his Princeton notes into patent applications, partly because he feared that if he died no one would be able to read his handwriting. His father took the drafts to a Worcester patent lawyer.
In 1914 the U.S. Patent Office granted two patents that would define his field. One described a multi-stage rocket. The other described a rocket that could burn either solid fuel or liquid propellants, fed into a combustion chamber. He was thirty-one, convalescent and largely unknown.
Two Percent to Sixty-Three
In the fall of 1914 Goddard returned to Clark as a part-time instructor and research fellow and began building rockets. His first test launch of a powder rocket, early one evening in 1915, alarmed the campus janitor, after which he moved the work indoors.
The laboratory work that followed was the foundation of modern rocketry, though almost no one noticed. Goddard measured what fraction of a powder rocket's chemical energy actually became motion, and found that ordinary rockets managed about 2 percent. He then attached a converging-diverging nozzle of the kind the Swedish engineer Gustaf de Laval had designed for steam turbines. The nozzle accelerated the exhaust to supersonic speed. In static tests, efficiencies jumped above 60 percent, with exhaust velocities over 7,000 feet per second — better, by his measurement, than any heat engine of the day.
He also settled an argument many physicists still had wrong. Some believed a rocket needed air to push against. Goddard fired rockets inside a vacuum chamber and showed not only that they worked but that they performed better without air. Between 1916 and 1917 he built small glass devices that were among the first experimental ion thrusters.
The work was expensive for a part-time instructor. In September 1916 he wrote to the Smithsonian Institution, reporting his efficiency results and estimating that a rocket weighing under 90 pounds at launch could lift a one-pound payload more than 200 miles. The Smithsonian asked for more detail, and he sent a manuscript he had already prepared, titled A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes. In January 1917 the Smithsonian awarded him $5,000 over five years. Clark added $3,500 and laboratory space, and WPI lent him an abandoned magnetics lab at the edge of campus for testing. His colleagues were startled that anyone would pay so much for what they did not regard as serious science. Later rocket engineers, who knew what rockets cost, thought it astonishingly little.
When the United States entered the First World War, Goddard offered his work to the military. The Army Signal Corps funded him, and he moved temporarily to the Mount Wilson Observatory in California for security. With his colleague Clarence Hickman he developed a tube-launched rocket that a soldier could fire from the shoulder. They demonstrated it to Army officers at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland in early November 1918, using music stands as a launch rest. The Army was impressed. The Armistice came days later, and the project stopped. Hickman and Army officers revived the idea in the 1940s, adding a shaped-charge warhead; the result was the bazooka.
A Severe Strain on Credulity
Goddard was reluctant to publish. His engine was not finished, and he disliked claiming results he had not demonstrated. Webster, his old teacher, pushed hard: publish, or Webster would do it for him. So in late 1919 the Smithsonian issued A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes as a 69-page monograph in its Miscellaneous Collections. It laid out the theory of rocket flight, his solid-fuel experiments and the case for using rockets to explore the upper atmosphere, where balloons could not reach. Near the end, in a few lines, he calculated how large a rocket would need to be to carry enough flash powder to the Moon to produce a flash visible through a telescope from Earth.
Those few lines were what the newspapers read. On January 12, 1920, the New York Times ran a front-page story on the Smithsonian's announcement, including the Moon proposal. The next day an unsigned Times editorial under the heading "A Severe Strain on Credulity" granted that Goddard's rocket might be useful for atmospheric research, then declared that it could not work beyond the air because there would be nothing to push against. It suggested, with heavy sarcasm, that the professor seemed to lack knowledge taught every day in high schools.
The editorial was wrong on the physics and Goddard had already proved it in his laboratory. It did not matter. Other papers piled on, and the Smithsonian received so much eccentric correspondence that it stopped courting publicity for the work. Goddard issued a statement through the Associated Press trying to redirect attention to atmospheric research, and later published a careful rebuttal in Scientific American and an explanation of his vacuum experiments in Popular Science. To one reporter, according to Clark University's archives, he replied that every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it, and becomes commonplace once realised.
The episode shaped the rest of his career. He did not stop working; he stopped talking. From then on he spoke publicly about high-altitude research and avoided the word "space." He shared details only with a small circle he trusted. His monograph, meanwhile, went out to about 1,750 recipients worldwide and was read carefully in Europe and the Soviet Union. The Romanian-German theorist Hermann Oberth wrote to Goddard asking for a copy in 1922. Frank Winter, a Smithsonian historian, would later describe the paper as one of the key catalysts of the international rocket movement of the 1920s and 1930s.
From Powder to Liquid
Goddard understood that solid propellants could not take a rocket to space. Liquids stored more energy per pound, could be fed into a small, light combustion chamber and could, in principle, be throttled and restarted. He began serious experiments with liquid oxygen and liquid fuel in September 1921. Hydrogen was his theoretical favourite, but liquid hydrogen was not available, so he chose gasoline as the cheapest and safest fuel to handle.
The problems were brutal. Liquid oxygen boils at about minus 183 degrees Celsius, and the combustion chamber a few inches away runs thousands of degrees hot. Propellants had to be injected, mixed and burned smoothly without burning through the chamber walls. Goddard fired his first liquid-propellant engine on a test stand in November 1923. He then spent more than a year trying to build a small piston pump to feed the propellants, and could not make it work within his budget. So he dropped the pump and pressurised the tanks with an inert gas instead, a method still used on many rockets today. On December 6, 1925, on a stand in the Clark physics laboratory, an engine using the simpler system lifted its own weight during a 27-second run. Three months later he took a rocket to Aunt Effie's farm.
In 1924 he married Esther Christine Kisk, a secretary in the office of Clark's president whom he had met in 1919. She would become his photographer, bookkeeper and eventual archivist. Most of the images of his work that survive were taken by her.
The first rocket put its engine at the top, with the tanks hanging below, on the theory that it would be pulled upward like a pendulum and stay stable. The flights showed it was no more stable than a conventional layout and much heavier, so within weeks Goddard moved the engine to the bottom, where it has been on nearly every rocket since. That quick reversal shows how he worked: a clear hypothesis, a test and a willingness to drop the idea when the data disagreed.
On July 17, 1929, a larger rocket at Auburn carried a small barometer, thermometer and camera — the first scientific instruments flown on a liquid-propellant rocket — and all were recovered. It climbed only about 90 feet before crashing, but it was loud and bright. Neighbours thought an aeroplane had gone down in flames. Two police ambulances went searching for victims, and reporters arrived before Goddard's team had packed up. Worcester papers ran extras, and the Associated Press carried the story across the country. Local residents demanded that the Massachusetts fire marshal stop the tests, and Goddard had to move his work to the Army's Camp Devens, beyond the state's jurisdiction.
Lindbergh Makes a Phone Call
Among those who read about the Auburn flight was Charles Lindbergh. Two years after his solo flight across the Atlantic, Lindbergh was the most famous aviator in the world and was wondering what would come after propellers. He had settled on rockets and jets as the likely answer. After checking with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that Goddard was a serious physicist, he telephoned him in November 1929 and soon visited Clark.
The two men got on immediately. Goddard, who had grown guarded with almost everyone, spoke openly with Lindbergh, and the friendship lasted the rest of his life. Lindbergh set about finding money, which after the stock market crash of October 1929 was not easy. He secured a small grant from the Carnegie Institution. Then in 1930 he persuaded the financier Daniel Guggenheim, whose family fund had already done much to promote American aviation, to commit $100,000: two years of funding, with two more to follow if an advisory committee judged the results worth it. One of those who helped document Goddard's experiments for the Guggenheims was a former student of his at Clark, Edwin Aldrin Sr., whose son Buzz would walk on the Moon.
With the grant came the chance to leave New England. Goddard and a Clark meteorologist went through weather statistics looking for high, dry, sparsely populated land with little wind and good visibility year-round. They settled on the high plains of eastern New Mexico. In July 1930 Goddard, Esther and a handful of mechanics moved to Roswell and set up a shop near town and a launch tower at a test site in Eden Valley. Clark granted him leave. He would spend most of the next eleven years there.
The Roswell Years
Roswell gave Goddard what Worcester never could: space to fail. Rockets could crash on the prairie without frightening anyone, and ranchers who valued their own privacy were happy to point curious visitors in the wrong direction.
The work advanced steadily. By September 1931 his rockets had the shape people now associate with the word: a smooth metal casing with fins. In April 1932 he flew a rocket steered by vanes in its exhaust, controlled by a gyroscope — the same principle the German V-2 would use a decade later. The rocket crashed after a short climb, but the guidance system had worked, and he counted the test a success.
That spring the Depression caught up with the Guggenheim fund, and Daniel Guggenheim had died in 1930. Goddard had to return to teaching at Clark, which he found a trial. His son Harry Guggenheim took over the family's support, and in the autumn of 1934 funding resumed and Goddard went back to New Mexico. The A-series rockets that followed, 13 to 15 feet long and steered by gyroscope, reached altitudes of more than 7,000 feet in 1935; one flew at an estimated 550 miles per hour. In 1936 he flew a rocket with four combustion chambers. In 1937 he replaced the exhaust vanes with a movable tail section that swivelled the whole engine, an early form of the gimballed thrust vectoring that steers large rockets today. On March 26, 1937, his L-13 rocket climbed to about 1.7 miles, the highest any of his rockets would go.
— The New York Times, 'A Correction,' July 17, 1969It is now definitely established that a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere. The Times regrets the error.
The later work was harder and less photogenic. Larger engines burned through their chambers. He tried cooling the chamber walls with a curtain of excess fuel, with mixed results. Pump manufacturers, when approached, had no interest in building tiny high-speed pumps for such a small customer, so from 1938 to 1940 his team designed and built their own turbopumps and gas generators. Esther later called the pump work the most trying and disheartening phase of the research. The pump-fed P-series rockets of 1940 and 1941 crashed after climbing only a few hundred feet, but the pumps themselves worked, and Goddard was satisfied. His last rocket flight was on May 8, 1941.
He did not think of a crash as a failure if it taught him something. According to Clark's archivists, he liked to describe disappointing tests as "valuable negative information." He wrote to a correspondent that it was not simple to tell unsuccessful experiments from successful ones, since most work that finally succeeds is the result of a series of failed tests in which the difficulties are gradually removed.
His personal life in Roswell was quiet and conventional. He painted the New Mexico landscape, sometimes with the artist Peter Hurd, played the piano and joined the Rotary Club. The writer Paul Horgan, a friend, remembered him as almost ordinary on the surface, with an unusual sense of purpose underneath. The Goddards had no children. His lungs never fully recovered from tuberculosis. When he applied for life insurance in Roswell, the company doctor told him he belonged in a sanatorium in Switzerland.
Secrecy and Its Costs
The Roswell years also showed the cost of Goddard's caution. He published summaries — a 1936 Smithsonian report, Liquid-Propellant Rocket Development, described much of his progress — and he patented relentlessly. But he disliked sharing unpublished details, and he was wary of academic groups who, he suspected, might build careers on his years of work.
In August 1936 Frank Malina, a graduate student at the California Institute of Technology, visited Roswell. Goddard would discuss little beyond what he had already published. Malina's mentor, the aerodynamicist Theodore von Kármán, was irritated, and later wrote that the trouble with secrecy is that one can easily go in the wrong direction and never know it. The Caltech group that Malina helped found became the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. It deliberately avoided the word "rocket" in its name because the word still had such a poor reputation.
Goddard had reasons. The 1920 ridicule had hurt his standing. His health made him feel short of time, and he did not want to spend it arguing with sceptics or answering every amateur who wrote to him. Much of his wartime work was classified. As Germany rearmed, he stopped answering letters from German rocket experimenters. In 1936, when Lindbergh returned from a tour of German aviation and reported that his hosts had been open about aircraft but silent about rockets, Goddard concluded that they must be planning to use them. He had predicted as early as 1923, in a letter to the Smithsonian, that rocketry might become something like a race.
His warnings went mostly unheeded. Before the war, the Army and Navy saw little value in large rockets. The head of aeronautics at MIT reportedly told an Army Air Corps meeting that Caltech could take on the "Buck Rogers" work. In 1940, Goddard, Lindbergh and Harry Guggenheim offered his services to the armed forces and found little interest.
The War and the V-2
Eventually the Navy signed him up, though for a modest task. In 1941 a young officer, Lieutenant Charles Fischer, persuaded the Bureau of Aeronautics that Goddard could build a liquid-fuelled rocket to help heavily loaded seaplanes take off from short stretches of water. In 1942 Goddard and his team moved to the Naval Engineering Experiment Station in Annapolis, Maryland. When Esther worried about his health in the humid climate, he reminded her there was a war on.
He considered the assignment a square peg in a round hole; he wanted to build long-range rockets. But he delivered. His variable-thrust engine could be throttled, stopped and restarted on command, and in a later demonstration for Navy and Washington officials it exceeded the Navy's requirements. His team built pumps for other Navy projects and consulted with Reaction Motors, the first American company formed to build rocket engines. After the war, his variable-thrust work fed into the Curtiss-Wright engine that powered the Bell X-2 rocket plane.
In the spring of 1945 Goddard examined a captured German V-2 at Annapolis. The V-2 was far larger and more advanced than anything he had flown; the Germans had spent enormous state resources on it and had used slave labour to build it. But its turbopumps, its gyroscopically controlled exhaust vanes and its fuel-film cooling of the chamber walls were features he had developed and patented years earlier, and he believed his work had been used. Whether the Peenemünde team relied on his patents directly remains debated. What is clear is that Wernher von Braun had read his 1919 monograph through Oberth's circle, and that von Braun later credited Goddard's rockets with blazing the trail for modern ones.
By then Goddard's voice had failed; he could speak only in a whisper. He was diagnosed with throat cancer, kept working as long as he could, and died in Baltimore on August 10, 1945, at sixty-two. He was buried in Worcester. He had made plans to join the new American aerospace industry at Curtiss-Wright and had recently joined the American Rocket Society as a director.
The Correction
Esther Goddard spent the next four decades making sure her husband was remembered. She sorted and edited his papers, published them and pursued 131 more patents from his notebooks. In 1951 she and the Guggenheim Foundation sued the United States government for infringing Goddard's patents in its postwar missile and rocket programmes. In 1960 the government settled for $1 million, half of it to Esther — at the time, the largest government patent settlement on record, and more than all the funding Goddard had received in his lifetime.
Recognition came in a rush after Sputnik. In 1959 Congress awarded him a posthumous gold medal, and NASA named its new Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, in his honour. The Auburn launch site, now part of a golf course, became a National Historic Landmark. On July 17, 1969, the day after Apollo 11 left Florida for the Moon, the New York Times printed a short item acknowledging that its 1920 editorial had been wrong about rockets in a vacuum. Buzz Aldrin, whose father had once studied under Goddard, carried a small biography of him to the Moon. Decades later, Blue Origin, the rocket company founded by Jeff Bezos, named its first test vehicle Goddard.
The fairest summary is that Goddard was right about almost everything technical and cautious about almost everything else. He saw early that liquid-fuelled, multi-stage, gyroscopically steered rockets could leave the Earth, and he built and flew the first working examples of most of the necessary parts, with a handful of mechanics and a few hundred thousand dollars over three decades. His secrecy protected his credit and his peace, and it slowed the diffusion of his results. The engineers who built America's first large missiles after the war often learned rocketry from the German team rather than from Goddard's patents, many of which were locked away during the war. His story is a reminder that being first and being influential are separate achievements.
In 1932, writing to H. G. Wells, whose novel had sent him up the cherry tree, Goddard said he could not know how many more years he would have to work on the problem, but that aiming at the stars was a task for generations, so that however much progress one made there was always the thrill of just beginning.
Part IIThe Playbook
Goddard worked for most of his life with little money, a small team, uncertain health and a public that had laughed at him. His methods for making progress anyway are unusually transferable to anyone building something ahead of its time. So are his mistakes, particularly around secrecy and influence. The principles below draw on both.
The principles
- 1.Anchor a lifetime project to a specific moment of purpose.
- 2.Do the math before you build.
- 3.Measure the real efficiency, not the assumed one.
- 4.Borrow proven parts from other industries.
- 5.Protect ideas early with patents and notebooks.
- 6.Pitch the near-term use, not the moonshot.
- 7.Choose the simpler system that works today.
- 8.Go where failure is cheap.
- 9.Treat every crash as data.
- 10.Find a patron with credibility, not just money.
- 11.Share enough to build a field around you.
Principle 1
Anchor a lifetime project to a specific moment of purpose.
Goddard marked October 19 every year for more than four decades. The cherry-tree afternoon was not a plan; the device he imagined that day would not have worked. What it gave him was a fixed point that survived tuberculosis, public ridicule, lapsed funding and years of crashed rockets.
Long projects fail less often from lack of intelligence than from erosion. Each setback is survivable; the accumulation wears people down. Goddard's annual ritual was a way of renewing his commitment deliberately rather than waiting to feel motivated. It connects to what psychologists describe as grit: sustained interest in a single direction over years.
The important detail is that the purpose was specific — reaching space — while the methods stayed flexible. He abandoned the whirling-weight idea, then solid fuel, then the top-mounted engine, without ever abandoning the goal.
Tactic: Write down the moment and the reason you committed to your hardest long-term project. Put a recurring date in your calendar to reread it and ask whether your current methods still serve it.
Principle 2
Do the math before you build.
Before Goddard built a serious rocket, he had worked out how a rocket's speed depends on exhaust velocity and the ratio of propellant to structure, including the effects of gravity and drag. That analysis told him where to focus: make the exhaust faster and the vehicle lighter. Everything else in his career — the nozzles, the liquid propellants, the thin-walled tanks wound with wire — followed from those two conclusions.
This is first-principles thinking in its original sense: derive what must be true from physics, then build toward it. It saved him from spending years improving parts of the system that could never matter much.
It also made his small budget go further. A team of a handful of mechanics can do a great deal if it knows which variable to push.
Tactic: Before building anything expensive, write the equation or model that governs its performance and identify the one or two terms that dominate. Spend your first resources on those.
Principle 3
Measure the real efficiency, not the assumed one.
In 1915 nobody had carefully measured how much of a rocket's chemical energy became motion. Goddard did, and discovered that the answer was about 2 percent. That single number reframed the whole field: rockets were not inherently weak, they were badly designed, and there was enormous room for improvement.
Careful measurement also let him win arguments he could not win with words. His vacuum-chamber tests showed that rockets work better without air, settling the dispute that the New York Times later got wrong. Data gave him confidence even when public opinion ran against him.
Many teams skip this step because the baseline seems obvious. Often the baseline is wrong, and the gap between assumed and measured performance is where the opportunity lies.
Tactic: For the process you most want to improve, measure its actual output against its theoretical maximum before changing anything. If the gap is large, you have found your project.
Principle 4
Borrow proven parts from other industries.
Goddard's biggest early gain came from a steam-turbine nozzle designed decades earlier by Gustaf de Laval. Nobody had put one on a rocket. Doing so raised efficiency more than twentyfold in his tests. Later, he adapted gyroscopes from navigation and aviation for guidance, and pressurised gas feed systems from industrial practice when his pumps failed.
Frontier fields often look as though they need everything invented from scratch. In practice, much of what they need already exists in some adjacent domain, and the creative step is noticing the connection.
This lowers risk as well as cost. A borrowed component comes with years of other people's testing behind it.
Tactic: List the three hardest technical problems in your project and, for each, name two other industries that have solved something similar. Talk to someone in each before designing your own solution.
Principle 5
Protect ideas early with patents and notebooks.
Goddard wrote his first patent applications while recovering from an illness his doctors expected to kill him. In Worcester's manufacturing culture, patents served both as protection and as proof of priority. He went on to be credited with 214, and his notebooks and diaries documented his thinking in detail.
That record paid off. After his death, his estate and the Guggenheim Foundation won a $1 million settlement from the U.S. government for infringement — more than all the money he had raised for research. The same documentation is why historians can say with confidence what he did first.
Intellectual property is often discussed as a commercial weapon. For a lone inventor, it is also a way of making sure the credit and some of the value survive, even if the inventor does not.
Tactic: Keep a dated log of significant ideas and experiments, and review it quarterly with the question: which of these would I regret not protecting if someone else built it first?
Principle 6
Pitch the near-term use, not the moonshot.
Goddard's goal was spaceflight. His funding pitches were about weather and the upper atmosphere, where balloons could not reach and data was scarce. The Smithsonian funded atmospheric research, and later sponsors backed high-altitude rockets. When his 1919 monograph spent a few lines on the Moon, those lines were what the press seized on, and the ridicule set back his public credibility for years.
The lesson he drew was to keep the most ambitious framing among people who already understood the work, and lead with the application that funders could see and value now. Buzz-generating visions attract attention; they also attract mockery when results are still years away.
This is not deception if the near-term use is real. Goddard's sounding rockets genuinely would have advanced meteorology, and the same engineering moved him toward space.
Tactic: Write two versions of your pitch: the long-term vision for your team, and the concrete near-term problem you solve for your funder or customer. Lead with the second in public.
Principle 7
Choose the simpler system that works today.
In 1924 and 1925, Goddard spent months trying to build a small pump to feed propellants into his engine. It kept failing, and his funding would not stretch. So he dropped the pump and pressurised the tanks with gas instead. Three months after the first successful static test with that system, he flew the world's first liquid-propellant rocket.
He did return to pumps. Fifteen years later, with more resources, his team built working turbopumps. But the sequencing mattered: the simpler design let him fly, learn and keep his sponsors interested while the harder component waited.
The minimum viable product idea has become a startup cliché, but its core is sound. The first version should be the simplest one that tests the central question.
Tactic: When one component is blocking your whole project, ask whether a cruder alternative would let you test the rest of the system now. If so, ship with the crude version and schedule the better one for later.
Principle 8
Go where failure is cheap.
In Auburn, one loud rocket brought ambulances, reporters and a fire marshal's ban. In Roswell, a crash was a dent in the prairie. Goddard chose New Mexico methodically, with a meteorologist and weather tables, looking for dry air, low wind, good visibility and few neighbours. The move multiplied the number of tests he could run and removed the social cost of each one.
The environment in which you experiment determines how many experiments you can afford. Organisations that punish visible failure end up running fewer tests and learning more slowly.
Goddard's choice was physical, but the principle applies equally to software sandboxes, pilot markets and internal prototypes.
Tactic: Identify what makes a failed experiment expensive in your current setting — money, reputation, approvals — and design a test environment that removes the biggest of those costs.
Principle 9
Treat every crash as data.
Many of Goddard's rockets crashed, veered off course or burned through their chambers. He counted a 1932 flight that crashed after a short climb as a success because its gyroscopic guidance had worked. He called disappointing results valuable negative information, and argued that successful work is usually the end of a long series of unsuccessful tests in which problems are removed one by one.
This attitude is what the experimental mindset looks like under real pressure. Each test was designed to answer a specific question, so even a crash could answer it. That is different from simply trying things and hoping.
It also protected his morale through years in which, from the outside, his rockets looked unimpressive next to what the Germans were achieving with vastly more money.
Tactic: Before every test, write down the single question it is meant to answer. Afterward, record the answer first and the outcome second.
Principle 10
Find a patron with credibility, not just money.
Lindbergh brought Goddard more than a phone call. He checked Goddard's standing with MIT, lent his fame to the work and opened the door to the Guggenheims at a moment when, after the 1929 crash, private money was almost unobtainable. Harry Guggenheim then sustained the work through the 1930s and helped connect it to the military.
For someone who had been publicly ridiculed, a sponsor with unimpeachable credibility changed how the work was perceived. Lindbergh's endorsement did what Goddard's own rebuttals never could.
The best early backers of unusual work often provide legitimacy as much as capital, and they are worth pursuing for that reason.
Tactic: When seeking support for a contrarian project, list the people whose endorsement would change how sceptics see it. Approach one of them for advice before you ask anyone for money.
Goddard's caution protected his credit and his time. It also meant that Caltech's group went its own way after a guarded visit in 1936, that American engineers after the war often learned rocketry from German émigrés instead of from his patents, and that his influence on the programme that eventually reached the Moon was indirect. Von Kármán's complaint — that secrecy lets you go in the wrong direction without knowing it — was aimed at him.
A single inventor can be right about a field and still be bypassed by it. Fields grow through shared results, trained people and institutions. Goddard realised this late; near the end of his life he joined the American Rocket Society and planned to take his team into industry.
The balance is hard. Protect what gives you advantage, but publish, teach and collaborate enough that others build on your work rather than around it. The concept of secrets is valuable because some knowledge should be kept close — but a secret that nobody ever acts on has no value.
Tactic: Once a year, decide explicitly which parts of your work you will publish, license or teach, and which you will keep. Default toward sharing anything that no longer gives you a lead.
Free playbook
Get The Business Model Playbook
58 business models, one visual page each: how the money flows, the metrics that matter, and who runs it. Free when you join the Faster Than Normal email.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Part IIIMaxims
-
Ridicule is often a sign of timing, not error. The editorial that mocked Goddard in 1920 was corrected forty-nine years later, the week men flew to the Moon.
-
Small teams can outrun their budgets if they know what matters. A handful of mechanics in New Mexico solved problems that large institutions later spent fortunes on.
-
Silence protects the work and hides it. Goddard's reticence spared him further mockery and cost him influence he might otherwise have had.
-
Frailty can concentrate effort. Expecting a short life, Goddard spent his limited energy on the problems only he was working on.
-
The spouse behind the camera is part of the record. Much of what the world knows about Goddard exists because Esther photographed it, filed it and fought for it.
-
Being first is not the same as being followed. History credits Goddard; the Apollo programme owed much of its engineering lineage to others.
-
Institutions discover pioneers after crises. Recognition arrived in a rush once Sputnik made rockets urgent.
-
A good question can outlive every answer you try. How to reach space outlasted every mechanism Goddard sketched along the way.
In Their Own Words
I feel we are doing something worthwhile. It is a wonderful feeling to realize that what we are doing today will someday take man to the moon.— Robert Goddard, late in life
Professor Goddard does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react... he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.— New York Times Editorial, 1920
It looked almost magical as it rose, without any appreciably greater noise or flame, as if it said, 'I've been here long enough; I think I'll be going somewhere else, if you don't mind.'— Robert Goddard, diary entry, March 16, 1926
The dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow.— Robert Goddard, 1945
It is difficult to say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow.— Robert Goddard
I was a different boy when I descended the tree from when I ascended. Existence at last seemed very purposive.— Robert Goddard, reflecting on his 1899 epiphany
Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace.— Robert Goddard
The rocket worked perfectly except for landing on the wrong planet.— Robert Goddard
A rocket will never be able to leave the Earth's atmosphere... Professor Goddard does not know the relation of action to reaction.— Robert Goddard
The rocket will free man from his remaining chains, the chains of gravity which still tie him to this planet.— Robert Goddard
Don't tell me that man doesn't belong out there. Man belongs wherever he wants to go—and he'll do plenty well when he gets there.— Robert Goddard
I have learned to use the word 'impossible' with the greatest caution.— Robert Goddard
Just remember: when you think all is lost, the future remains.— Robert Goddard
The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.— Robert Goddard
God pity a one-dream man.— Robert Goddard
Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.— Robert Goddard
It might be well to point out that the development of the rocket has reached about the same point that aviation had reached when the Wright brothers made their first powered flight.— Robert Goddard, on the future of space travel
The rocket will free man from his remaining chains, the chains of gravity which still tie him to this planet. It will open to him the gates of heaven.— Robert Goddard
I have always believed that the rocket will, in time, open the universe to mankind. What we do today is but the first small step in that direction.— Robert Goddard, on his life's work
There can be no thought of finishing, for 'aiming at the stars' both literally and figuratively, is a problem to occupy generations, so that no matter how much progress one makes, there is always the thrill of just beginning.— Robert Goddard
Further reading
- Rocket Man: Robert H. Goddard and the Birth of the Space Age by David A. Clary
