A Loaf of Bread at Three in the Morning
One o'clock struck, and then two, and then three, and a young woman who had been raised to "great prospects" was still sitting up in a farmhouse kitchen sixteen miles from Dumfries, watching a loaf of bread. She knew Latin. She was a very fair mathematician. She had read Virgil by the age of ten. She knew nothing whatever about fermentation or ovens, and the bread brought from Dumfries had "soured on his stomach," and so it was plainly, as she put it, her "duty as a Christian wife to bake at home." She had put the loaf in "at the time myself ought to have [been] put into bed," and now she sat "in an intense solitude, my whole body aching with weariness, my heart aching with a sense of forlornness and degradation." She, "who had never been required to do anything but cultivate my mind," was keeping watch over "a loaf of bread! which mightn't turn out bread after all!" She laid her head on the table and sobbed aloud.
Then she thought of Benvenuto Cellini, sitting up all night over his bronze Perseus in the furnace. What was admirable in the man was not the statue but "his determined will, his energy, his patience, his resource." Had Cellini been "a woman living at Craigenputtock, with a dyspeptic husband, sixteen miles from a baker, and he a bad one, all these same qualities would have come out most fitting in a good loaf of bread!" "I cannot express," she wrote, "what consolation this germ of an idea spread over an uncongenial life."
She told the story almost thirty years later, in January 1857, to a Carlisle schoolteacher who felt undervalued and wanted to be a writer. By then Jane Welsh Carlyle was the wife of a celebrated author, the mistress of one of the great houses of Victorian London, and the author of what may be the best letters of her age. Her biographer Rosemary Ashton notes how "intense, bristling, magnified" the memory is.
That is the double story of Jane Welsh Carlyle, and it is why she belongs among the lives in
The Anatomy of Greatness. She bet her whole life on an unknown, dyspeptic genius, kept house for him on a shoestring for forty years, and fought the battles he would have lost. She turned loneliness, jealousy and illness into comedy that still reads as fresh as the morning it was posted. And she paid for it with her health, with the books she never wrote and, for long stretches, with her happiness. The paradox at the centre is the one in the kitchen: an extraordinary will, an extraordinary energy, poured into a loaf of bread.
By the Numbers
The Sage's Wife
10Her age when she was reading Virgil, after a Latin tutor engaged over her mother's objections
5 yearsHow long she held Thomas Carlyle at a distance before marrying him (1821–1826)
16 milesDistance from Craigenputtoch to Dumfries, and the nearest baker
23 monthsCarlyle's stretch without earning a penny by early 1835, with some £230 left
£35 a yearRent she agreed for 5, Cheyne Row, Chelsea, in June 1834
£30Extra housekeeping granted within a day of her mock-parliamentary Budget, February 1855
£100Taken off Carlyle's tax assessment after she faced the board in his place, November 1855
The Flower o' Haddington
She was the clever, spoilt only child of a Haddington doctor, and her father was "one whose wishes were law." He was "ambitious for his daughter." He gave her a Latin tutor over her mother's objections, and as a schoolgirl she "vied with the boys both intellectually and physically." She crawled along the ledge of Nungate Bridge. She took "hissing Ganders by the neck." She was "Dux" of the Haddington school. Carlyle, years later, remembered the little pupil "from under the table" crying, "let me be a boy, too, Papa!"
Her inner world, she said, was "three fourths Old Roman, and one fourth Old Fairy," and the best illustration of it is the funeral of her doll. Her father told her that "a young lady in Virgil should for consistency's sake drop her doll," and so, at ten, she gave the doll a Roman death. She built a funeral pyre of the doll's dresses, her four-posted bed, cedar allumettes, cinnamon, cloves "and a – nutmeg(!)," and recited the dying words of Dido, "which I had then all by heart as pat as a b c." The doll, "being stuffed with bran," caught fire and "blazed up," and "in that supreme moment my affection for her blazed up also, and I shrieked and would have saved her, and couldn't, and went on shrieking; till every body within hearing flew to me and bore me off in a plunge of tears!"
Writing as an adult, she drew the moral against herself: "An epitome of most of one's 'heroic sacrifices', it strikes me, magnanimously resolved on, ostentatiously gone about, repented of at the last moment and bewailed with an outcry!" Ashton finds the same shape in the marriage that followed. Like the little girl "magnanimously sacrificing her doll," Jane accepted Carlyle's right to command and "found herself repenting and sometimes bewailing her lot."
The pride came early too. She believed herself descended from John Knox. When the time came to consider marriage she said she could not marry "into a station inferior to my own." And she was sceptical from the start: Edward Irving, her earlier love, worried about her "visible tendency to religious scepticism."
Her father died of typhus in 1819. She went into mourning black and stayed in it for nearly seven years.
Your Wife! Never, Never!
In June 1821 Irving brought an awkward friend to Haddington. Thomas Carlyle was twenty-five, poor, dyspeptic, without a career, from an Annandale family "in decent obscurity." Jane was nineteen, still in mourning, and "the Flower o' Haddington," with suitors in the town. Her mother disliked Carlyle and expected her to marry "a man of settled career or good prospects." Jane was "not, it seems, sexually attracted to Carlyle."
What drew her was his mind, and she said so with unusual candour: "your eloquence awoke in my soul the slumbering admirations and ambitions that His first kindled there," meaning her father's. For five years she kept him at a distance, on her own terms, as a correspondent and tutor. When he mistook gratitude for love in 1823 she wrote: "Your Friend I will be, your truest most devoted friend, while I breathe the breath of life; but your wife! never, never!"
In January 1825 she set out her conditions with the precision that would mark everything she did. "I love you ... but I am not in love with you." She would not marry on less than was "sufficient for my wants." As for living at her own farm, Craigenputtoch: "I would just as soon think of building myself a nest on the Bass-rock." She managed her mother ("I am a young lady 'full of devices'"). She alternated warmth and refusal and kept control for five years.
In the end she chose him. She told her aunt that he was "among the cleverest men of his day" and that "I like him in the deepest part of my soul." They married quietly at her grandfather's house, Templand, in October 1826. She wore white, putting off the black she had worn "for nearly seven years."
In 1843 she told her cousin, perhaps exaggerating, that "When I finally agreed to marry him, I cried excessively and felt excessively shocked." An old Haddington nurse put it more simply: "he cam to finish her off like."
Paul Johnson's verdict is the one that matters for the bet: "She married Carlyle because she wanted to marry a genius, and thought he was one. And she was right." She had chosen a man in whom "few others cared to" believe.
A warm true heart to love me, a towering intellect to command me, and a spirit of fire to be the guiding star-light of my life.
— Jane Welsh, at twenty-five, on what she wanted
Exiled to Craigenputtoch
Her mother furnished "a little jewel of a house" for them at Comely Bank in Edinburgh. Carlyle soon "grew perfectly frantic with it all" and decided that only a remote farm would cure him and let him write. The farm was Craigenputtoch, the very place Jane had been threatened with as a child, when her mother once said she "deserved to be sent to Craigenputtoch to live on a hundred a year." She had refused it outright before the marriage. Now, as she later told Ellen Twisleton, "I might refuse before, but then, you know, it was a different matter; & there was no refusing."
The nearest farm was six miles away. Carlyle "read, wrote, walked, and rode alone." Jane ran the place. In 1828 she wrote cheerfully that "instead of shopping and making calls I have bread to bake and chickens to hatch." She was, she found, "sublimely ignorant of every branch of useful knowledge, though a capital Latin scholar and a very fair mathematician!!" So she "sent for Cobbett's 'Cottage Economy' and fell to work," and taught herself to sew, cook and bake. Carlyle later boasted that she "manages all things: poultry, flowers, bread-loaves; keeps a house still like a bandbox."
She also absorbed the household's violence in silence. Her brother-in-law Alick was "a man of the most outrageous, coarse, violent temper" who came home drunk from Dumfries. To complain to Carlyle "would be to drive him perfectly crazy," so she did not. When Alick fell behind with the rent he owed her mother, she took a cheque Carlyle had received from London, rode to Dumfries to cash it, and went straight on to Templand to pay the four months owed herself. It was the first instance of a pattern: the confrontation he could not face, she would.
She wrote a little: a translation from Goethe, and a notebook that "no Mortal gets a glimpse of." An 1832 poem from "The Desert," probably hers, ends: "While I! Oh, ask not what I do with mine! Would I were such!"
Carlyle wrote "Teufelsdreck," the future Sartor Resartus, at Craigenputtoch, and remembered the years as perhaps "our happiest days." She had, he said, "made the Desert blossom for herself and me there." Jane's memory was bitter. It was a place "where my two immediate predecessors had gone mad, and the third had taken to drink." Geraldine Jewsbury judged it "a great strain upon her nerves from which she never entirely recovered." And the writing came to nothing. Ashton's conclusion is hard but fair: "she fell back on victorious housekeeping," and "Jane lacked the compulsion which drove others to succeed."
The Gamble on London
In 1834 they gambled on London with no regular income. By early 1835 Carlyle had not earned a penny for twenty-three months, and they had "some £230" left, enough for about a year. Carlyle went ahead and chose a house, 5, Cheyne Row in Chelsea. Jane arrived on 4 June with Chico the canary, inspected it, and agreed to take it at £35 a year.
She delighted in its "most antique physiognomy, quite to our humour," with "closets to satisfy any Bluebeard," and over the following decades remodelled it again and again, usually while Carlyle was away. The house was her stage, and she set it.
Mazzini summed up her situation: "she has no children; her husband is good, but like all such writers, he lives only in ideas." She built a world of her own inside his. Her circle was separate from Carlyle's lions: Mazzini himself, Erasmus Darwin, old Edward Sterling, Italian refugees, and young women who adored her, chief among them Geraldine Jewsbury. She collected exiles, beggars and "mads," and in 1844 plucked a man named Plattnauer "from the Wandsworth Lunatic Asylum with the help of Erasmus Darwin." Mazzini told George Sand that "Madame Carlyle" was the woman he esteemed most in England.
Ashton sees need as well as kindness in this: "She wanted to be needed, and she needed to be adored." But the result was real. Many visitors "found themselves drawn more to Jane for her kindness, her gift for giving and receiving friendship, her vulnerability, and for the unsurpassed remarks and anecdotes in her conversation and correspondence." By the 1840s "all the world, British, American, European, made for their shabby-genteel corner of Chelsea." The bet on genius had come off.
From 1835 the couple often spent summers apart, and the marriage moved onto paper. They "corresponded themselves and one another into warmer feelings and better relations." When they were apart she wrote almost daily, and Johnson notes that "he really reckoned on getting one every day he was separated from her."
The Epistolary Stand-Up
The letters are the achievement, and the method behind them was a single skill: turning misery into comedy. Ashton calls them "Vandyke fidelity in words," borrowing Jane's own mocking phrase for Robert Tait's painting of their sitting room, about which she wrote: "The dog is the only member of the family who has reason to be pleased with his likeness as yet!" Johnson calls her "a natural raconteur" and "the epistolary stand-up comic getting fun, rage and tragic comedy out of a vast range of topics." He lists her running series: "'The Servant Problem,' 'Workmen Who Won't Work,' 'The Horrors of Chelsea.'" She performed them for Carlyle in the evenings and could make "his grim, craggy features relax into a smile, or even detonate a great snort of granitic laughter."
The comedy rested on exact detail and borrowed voices: Mazzini's English ("what shall I say?", "upon my honour", "thanks God"), servants' sayings, Annandale proverbs, a private language with Carlyle that softened blows. Her 1855 journal quotes George Sand, "rien ne soulage comme la rhétorique": nothing soothes like rhetoric.
The tongue could also wound. Froude remembered it as "like a cat's," one that "would take the skin off with a touch." In Johnson's phrase she was "a grumbler of genius" whose targets included "idle servants, drunken servants, thievish servants." Browning later called her "a hard, unlovable woman."
The Other Woman at Bath House
The darkest chapter of the marriage had a name: Lady Harriet Baring, later Lady Ashburton. Since the 1840s Carlyle had written to her as "my sovereign Lady." By 1855 he spent his evenings at Bath House, the Ashburtons' London home. Jane was invited to their country house, the Grange, as his wife, and felt it. Lady Harriet called her "Agrippina," explaining that the wit was that "my dog's name was Nero." Jane felt "she does not and never can like me!" She turned the insult into a signature ("Ever your loving Agrippina"). Geraldine Jewsbury later wrote that the mortifications, "though they were often and often self-made, were none the less intolerable to her."
Ashton's verdict on the triangle is even-handed and should be quoted whole: "Carlyle was selfish and acted, for such an honest man, in self-deceiving bad faith. Jane was excessively sensitive and excessively punitive." And she applied a double standard. She enjoyed the infatuation of other women's husbands (Jeffrey, Edward Sterling, Mazzini, Plattnauer) because "With them Jane could control the situation and enjoy, without guilt, the feeling of triumph." She showed "scant sympathy" when Anthony Sterling's wife broke down believing he loved Jane. "Somehow she expected the wives to accept the state of affairs with an equanimity which she could not even approach herself."
She was excitable and depressive. Mazzini described her to his mother as "a woman of intense feeling, even a little excitable." In 1846 she contemplated "the stillest coldest" anchorage. She took morphia for sleeplessness and wrote of it plainly: "I will take a dose of morphia and do the impossible to sleep." In 1855: "My most constant and pressing anxiety is to keep out of Bedlam!" Ashton leaves open "how addicted" she was "to morphine, opium, and other medicines."
The Cocks of No. 6
Against this background she fought the household's battles. In 1853 Carlyle had begun Frederick the Great and could not work for the noise of the neighbours' poultry and macaw. An expensive "sound-proof room" on the roof had failed: "the cocks still crowed, and the macaw still shrieked, and Mr. C still stormed." That December, at the Grange, with Jane nursing a head she had cracked on a marble slab and Carlyle's mother dying, he "came to me one morning, all of a sudden, and told me I must go up to London myself" to rent the house next door and evict the tenant, a man called Ronca. (In Carlyle's later account, she offered.) There were six days left before notices to quit had to be served. "I thought it a most wild-goose enterprise I was sent on." When Lady Ashburton asked why he had not gone himself, Carlyle "coolly answered, 'Oh I should only spoil the thing, she is sure to manage it.'"
She managed it, and did better than take the house. She got the tenants "bound down legally 'under a penalty of ten pounds, and of immediate notice to quit, never to keep, or allow to be kept, fowls, or macaw, or other nuisance on their premises,'" in return for five pounds. She held the lease as a threat and chose not to use it: "the threat having served the end, I had no wish to turn the people out."
Carlyle called her "my saving champion (beautiful Dea ex machina)" and "my guardian genius." The price was her nerves. When the agreement was put in her hand, "I burst into tears, and should have kissed the man, if he had not been so ugly." The night after she got home, news came of her cousin Helen's death.
The Budget of a Femme Incomprise
The money was a running wound. Johnson notes that Carlyle's upbringing "had been abstemious," and that "long after he began to make an ample income" she still had to fight for housekeeping money. He met her requests with "withering sarcasm": "had I the slightest idea what amount of money would satisfy me?" The house improvements of 1853, dearer servants, gas and water "laid on," and the doubling of income tax for the Crimean War had all raised the costs. She had covered the gap with ten pounds from her own savings-bank account.
Instead of another row, she wrote a document. On 12 February 1855 she left him a mock parliamentary paper: "I don't choose to speak again on the Money question!" In it she plays Chancellor of the Exchequer, costing every new expense to the shilling before asking for anything. "Thro' six and twenty years," she argued, "I have kept house for you ... but always on less than it costs the generality of People, living in the same style." She asked for exactly £29 more a year and offered to cut her own dress allowance from £25 to £15. She declared the Exchequer "empty as a drum." Then she aimed at Lady Ashburton, who spent "four times my whole income in the Ball of one night!", and finished the dig with a Mazzini-ism: "'what shall I say?' – curious, 'upon my honour!'"
The Budget ends on a joke that is also a complaint: "If I were a man, I might 'fling the gauntlet to Society, join with a few brave fellows, and rob a Diligence'. But my sex 'kind of debars me from that!" She signed herself "your Obedient humble Servant, Jane Welsh Carlyle."
Carlyle surrendered at once: "Excellent, my dear clever Goody, – thriftiest, wittiest, and cleverest of women! I will set thee up again to a certainty, and thy £30 more shall be granted." Years later he could not "find in my heart to burn it, as perhaps I ought to do," and so a document unflattering to him survives.
The victory was limited. It came from comedy, not from any acknowledged right. And her bitterness kept rising. That autumn she began a secret journal.
Rhadamanthus at Kensington
The journal opened on 21 October 1855, a private place for what Carlyle called "the fact of things," which she found "very bleak and barren." Its second entry is the most famous complaint in the marriage. Carlyle had gone to "that eternal Bath House. I wonder how many thousand miles Mr C has walked between there and here, putting it all together; setting up always another milestone and another betwixt himself and me."
A month later it recorded her finest hour as his agent. On 20 November she fretted all day over the appeal against Carlyle's tax assessment and did not sleep. She set off the next morning "feeling like the ghost of a dead dog," while Carlyle "said 'the voice of honour seemed to call on him to go himself'. But either it did not call loud enough, or he would not listen to that charmer." Her reasoning for going in his place was exact: "If Mr. C. should go himself he would run his head against some post in his impatience; and besides, for me, when it is over it will be over, whereas he would not get the better of it for twelve months – if ever at all."
In the waiting room at 30 Hornton Street sat "the man who cleans our clocks, and a young apothecary of Cheyne Walk." Called as "First-come lady," Jane "stept forward into a grand peut-être." Three men sat at the table. The chief, "plainly the cock of that dungheap," was "sitting for Rhadamanthus – a Rhadamanthus without justice." He demanded to know why Carlyle had not come in person and declared "Huffgh! Huffgh! I understand nothing about that."
She laid Chapman and Hall's account on the table. "I understand my husband's affairs fully, better than he does himself." The writer earned nothing in a given year, she explained, because "in ceasing to write, one ceases to be paid for writing." She offered her oath and was scorned: "You! you, indeed! No, no! we can do nothing with your oath." When the chief pressed about Carlyle's land she answered "haughtily, for my spirit was up," that it was something "of which, ... I have fortunately no account to render in this kingdom and to this board."
The board took a hundred pounds off the assessment. Her first thought outside was "what a mercy Carlyle didn't come himself!" Her conclusion was resigned: "When one has been threatened with a great injustice, one accepts a smaller as a favour." And the entry ends without triumph: "Went back to spend the evening with Geraldine when Mr C set forth for Bath House."
I wonder how many thousand miles Mr C has walked between there and here, putting it all together; setting up always another milestone and another betwixt himself and me.
— Jane Welsh Carlyle, journal, 1855
The Nadir
The months that followed were the lowest of the marriage, and the journal records them without comedy. "Then, as now, I had walked, walked, walked with no aim but to tire myself." She went to the Grange that Christmas despite having "to care for my dress at this time of day more than I ever did when young and pretty and happy," and dressed "very fine" for Bath House dinners. In April 1856 she called on "my lady," who "was perfectly civil, for a wonder."
On 26 June 1856 the journal reads: "The chief interest of today expressed in blue marks on my wrists." Geraldine later said Carlyle had grasped her wrists in a quarrel. Ashton thinks rough handling likely, but locates the real fault elsewhere: "His chief culpability lies surely in his dogged obtuseness about her distress."
At her lowest, the sceptic's journal quotes the Psalms: "Have mercy upon me, Lord; for I am weak." And in March 1856 she preached Carlyle's old Goethean motto to herself: "Look straight before you, then, Jane Carlyle, and, if possible, not over the heads of things either, away into the distant vague. Look, above all, at the duty nearest hand, and what's more, do it."
In that same season she still could not walk past hypocrisy. On 11 April 1856, at the Chelsea baker's, she heard "this Jesuit of a baker" advise a one-legged pedlar to "join some Methodists' chapel for six months" to make useful friends. "Don't you think so, ma'am?" She did not: "whatever this man's object may be, he is not likely to be benefited in the long run by constituting himself a hypocrite." She told the pedlar to keep clear of "the true religion that is purposely put on some morning to make himself friends." "'Yes,' said the poor man pithily, 'not that at no price!'" Delighted, she "gave him – sixpence!" and, learning he was kept from a £40-a-year inheritance for want of money to prove his right, "undertook to get some honest lawyer to look at his papers and give him advice for nothing." Sharp tongue, scepticism, comic timing and practical kindness, in a week when her journal prayed for mercy.
The triangle ended with Lady Ashburton's death in May 1857. Jane wrote, "I was shocked, and dispirited, and feeling silence best," and was scornful of the condolence callers' "impertinent curiosity." She first disapproved of the second Lady Ashburton, Louisa, for "setting her cap" at the widower, but both Carlyles "became attached" to her in due course. Carlyle kept the journal and called it "a very sad record" of "the nadir of my poor Wife's sufferings."
Incognito in Haddington
One episode from the earlier years shows her at her most private. In July 1849 she went back to Haddington for the first time since 1826, alone and incognito behind "the thick black veil, put on for the occasion." She had herself shown round her own town as a "Stranger in search of the Picturesque." Her father's tomb "looked old, old; was surrounded by nettles," but two lines of the inscription had been recently cleared: "Who had been there before me, still caring for his tomb after twenty-nine years?" A cooper who did not know her told her that Miss Welsh had gone "away into England and – died there!" She "felt more than ever like my own ghost." Asked how many children she had, she said "None." "None at all? then what on earth had I been doing all this time?" "Amusing myself," she told him.
Next morning she climbed the churchyard wall instead of asking for the key, and an old neighbour on the train guessed who she was from that alone: "no other woman would climb the wall instead of going in at the gate." She wrote Carlyle a midnight letter "all about feelings," tore it up in the morning, and sent a short blessing instead. She kept the 6s. 6d. inn bill "all my days," as "the first inn-bill I ever in my life contracted and paid on my own basis."
Peter the Great for Six Shillings
The last years brought illness and, at the very end, the vindication of the bet. Ashton notes a lifelong pattern in which she "succumbed to illness in due time to be nursed by her mother," and Johnson, who thinks Carlyle's hypochondria was "catching," concludes that in the end "she was not a hypochondriac at all." She came through the illness of 1863–64 "looking both death and insanity in the face." In 1864, convalescent, she got a "nice little Brougham" with a grey mare named Bellona, and invented a way of visiting: "on the new principle of calling out the person visited to sit in the carriage with me!"
In April 1866 Carlyle, seventy, was installed as Rector of Edinburgh University. Jane stayed in Chelsea and imagined him "getting up to speak to an awful crowd of people" and "dropping down dead." He spoke without notes to a rapt hall. John Tyndall telegraphed her: "a perfect Triumph." "He is a Jewel, that man," she wrote. Her maids and cousin "danced and clapped." At Forster's that evening she drank Carlyle's health with Dickens and Wilkie Collins, and entertained Dickens with the opening of a "half romantic" spoken novel about the house next door. For two weeks she forwarded congratulations, including Punch's cartoon of him as "Wisdom."
On the morning of Saturday 21 April she wrote to him about her tea party (ten matching cups for eleven guests) and offered him a present. In a Richmond shop she had found a copy of the Frederick portrait. "The broker told me impressively, 'That, ma-am, is Peter the Great.' 'Indeed! and what is the price?' 'Seven-and-sixpence.' I offered five shillings on the spot, but he would only come down to six shillings."
That afternoon, driving in Hyde Park, she let her little dog Tiny out to run. When another carriage knocked it over she lifted it into the brougham, and a few yards on her coachman noticed her hands had not moved. She was dead.
Carlyle took comfort that she had been "never seen more brilliantly cheerful." Dickens thought of the novel she had begun to tell him.
How often I have thought of the unfinished novel. No one now to finish it. None of the writing women come near her at all.
— Charles Dickens, after Jane Carlyle's death, 1866
Agency Under Constraint
Paul Johnson, who pairs her with
Emily Dickinson in a chapter called "Tortured Heroism in a Man's World," counts as a hero anyone "widely, persistently over long periods, and enthusiastically regarded as heroic by a reasonable person, or even an unreasonable one." He places Jane among the "martyred wives of the famous," then rejects the label: "Jane was too self-reliant, combative and good tempered (as well as bad tempered) to be a martyr, though she has strong claims to heroine status." He builds her heroism from her choice of a genius, her comic letters ("I salute Jane the heroic entertainer"), and her courage in an illness that turned out to be real. Could she have been a great writer? "I doubt that."
The record complicates Johnson in two directions.
First, the constraints were real. She had to petition her husband for housekeeping money. As a wife she could not refuse Craigenputtoch: "there was no refusing." She was received at the Ashburtons' for her husband's sake, and feared being only the "worser half to a 'celebrated author'." In the worst years there was no outlet but a secret journal, morphia, and the blue marks on her wrists. She was fascinated by the 1844 Fraser adultery case because it could have been her: "Merciful Heaven – what criminalities have I walked over the top of without knowing it!"
Second, she was less a victim than Froude made her, and less serene than Johnson suggests. Johnson calls her jealousy of Lady Ashburton "a touch jealous at times" and says she "saw the point of the friendship." Her own journal, with "that eternal Bath House," says otherwise, and so does the 1846 contemplation of "the stillest coldest" anchorage.
Ashton's balance is the fairest. Carlyle was "no progressive advocate of sexual equality. Nor, really, was Jane, though she resented her subjection." She "made no valiant effort at independence." And the marriage that ate her literary talent also "fed, fostered, and also in the end preserved" it. Her letters are her novels. The one she spoke aloud to Dickens died with her.