Skip to content
Faster Than Normal
Economics & Markets

NIMBY

Model #0699Category: Economics & MarketsDepth to apply:

By Updated 3 sources

4 min read

Contents

  1. 1. Core Idea
  2. 2. How to See It
  3. 3. How to Use It
  4. 4. Founders & Leaders
  5. 5. Connected Models
  6. 6. One Key Quote
  7. 7. Summary & Further Reading
Economics & Markets
Section 1

Core Idea

NIMBY — "Not In My Back Yard" — is the pattern where people support a policy or project in the abstract but oppose it when it affects their own locale. Benefits are diffuse or distant; costs are concentrated and visible. So opposition is rational for the local actor even when the aggregate benefit exceeds the cost. Founders see NIMBY in zoning (housing, data centres, energy), regulation (new entrants, innovation), and internal change (reorgs, new tools). The lens: identify who bears the concentrated cost and who gets the diffuse benefit; then compensate, relocate, or build coalitions to shift the equilibrium.

Get Faster Than Normal by email

Ideas from founders and companies.

Free newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Or open the full subscribe page.

Section 2

How to See It

Real estate & infrastructure
You're seeing NIMBY when residents support more housing or green energy in general but fight specific projects nearby. Local costs (noise, views, congestion) dominate diffuse benefits.
Policy & regulation
You're seeing it when incumbents support "competition" or "innovation" in theory but lobby against specific entrants or rules that would affect them. Concentrated loss vs diffuse gain.
Org change
You're seeing it when teams agree that change is good but resist when it hits their team (reorg, tool, process). Local cost is salient; company-wide benefit is abstract.
Section 3

How to Use It

Map concentrated costs and diffuse benefits. Reduce opposition by compensating those who bear the cost (side payments, local benefits), by moving the "back yard" (siting, timing), or by making benefits more tangible for the affected group. When you’re the one opposing, ask whether your objection is really about total welfare or about your local cost — and whether compensation or redesign could align incentives.
Decision filter
"Who bears a concentrated cost and who gets a diffuse benefit? If the former are the ones who can block or lobby, we have a NIMBY problem; design compensation or coalition to address it."
As a founder
In expansion, policy, or partnerships, anticipate NIMBY: who will say "yes in general, no here"? Build in local benefits, compensation, or narrative that makes the trade-off acceptable, or choose battles where the concentrated losers are few or aligned.
Section 5

Founders & Leaders

Reed HastingsCo-founder & Executive Chairman, Netflix
Hastings has navigated regulatory and content battles where incumbents supported "innovation" in general but opposed specific threats. Founders can adopt the lens: expect NIMBY from those who bear concentrated cost; design offers or coalitions that reduce local opposition or shift the yard.
Section 7

Connected Models

Reinforces
Positive & Negative Externalities
NIMBY is often about negative externalities (noise, congestion) falling on a small group while benefits spread. Externalities are the economic structure; NIMBY is the political response.
Reinforces
Collective Action Problem
Diffuse beneficiaries find it hard to organise; concentrated losers mobilise easily. NIMBY is a consequence of that asymmetry in collective action.
Leads-to
Political/Government Failure
When NIMBY dominates, good aggregate projects get blocked. Understanding NIMBY helps explain policy gridlock and the gap between general support and local implementation.
Section 8

One Key Quote

"Everyone wants the landfill; nobody wants it nearby. The gap between general benefit and local cost is where politics lives."
— Common formulation in planning and economics
Section 11

Summary & Further Reading

NIMBY: support in general, opposition when the cost is in one’s back yard. Concentrated cost vs diffuse benefit drives it. Address via compensation, siting, or coalition so that local incentives align with the desired outcome.
01
The Logic of Collective Action — Mancur Olson (1965)
Book
Why diffuse interests underorganise and concentrated interests dominate.
02
NIMBY and local public goods — various (JSTOR, planning)
Article
Economic and political treatments of NIMBY.
03
Public choice and regulation — regulatory economics
Article
Concentrated benefits, diffuse costs, and policy outcomes.

Why this matters next

mental modelsIncentives

NIMBY applied the Incentives mental model

mental modelsTragedy of the Commons

NIMBY applied the Tragedy of the Commons mental model

mental modelsNarrative

NIMBY applied the Narrative mental model

mental modelsPublic Goods

NIMBY applied the Public Goods mental model

mental modelsPolitical/Government Failure

NIMBY applied the Political/Government Failure mental model

mental modelsCost

NIMBY applied the Cost mental model

Frequently asked questions

What is NIMBY?

NIMBY is a mental model used for better thinking and decision-making.

How do you apply NIMBY?

To apply NIMBY, identify situations where this framework is relevant, then use it as a lens to evaluate your options and decisions. The model is most useful when combined with other complementary mental models.

What category does NIMBY fall under?

NIMBY falls under the Economics & Markets category of mental models. Other models in this category can be found on the Economics & Markets hub page.

Why is NIMBY important?

NIMBY is important because it provides a structured way to think about problems that would otherwise be approached with intuition alone. Understanding this model helps you avoid common reasoning errors and make better decisions.

Continue exploring

AP

Mental model

Asymmetric Payoffs

Seek situations where the upside is uncapped and the downside is limited. The ex

BE

Mental model

Barriers to Entry

Structural obstacles that prevent new competitors from entering a market, protec

CP

Mental model

Collective Action Problem

The difficulty of getting individuals to cooperate for shared benefit when each

CA

Mental model

Comparative Advantage

The principle that entities should specialize in activities where their opportun

CD

Mental model

Creative Destruction

Schumpeter's theory that capitalism progresses through cycles where innovative e

ES

Mental model

Economies of Scale

Unit costs decrease as production volume increases, creating cost advantages tha

Get Faster Than Normal by email

Ideas from founders and companies.

Free newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Or open the full subscribe page.

Popular Mental Models

First Principles ThinkingOccam's RazorCircle of CompetenceInversionConfirmation BiasSecond-Order ThinkingDunning-Kruger EffectSurvivorship BiasPareto PrincipleOpportunity Cost