Part IThe Story
A Letter from the Farm
On April 7, 2020, as the pandemic crash was still unfolding, Mark Spitznagel wrote to the investors in his hedge fund. The S&P 500 had just fallen about a third in barely a month. Universa Investments' flagship fund, the Black Swan Protection Protocol, had returned 3,612 percent in March alone and 4,144 percent for the year to date. Forbes reported that Spitznagel told his clients the returns likely surpassed any other investment they could think of over the period they had been invested with him. Bloomberg obtained the letter, and within days the figure was all over the financial press. Spitznagel also wrote that Universa had cashed in many of its positions, locking in the gains, while keeping protection in place against further sell-offs, which he called one of the tricks of the trade. The same letter warned that the stimulus central banks were pouring into markets could prove destructive.
The numbers were real, but they were easy to misread. As Bloomberg later explained, Universa measures returns on what it calls required invested capital, meaning the money spent on option premiums, not on the total assets its clients hand it to protect. A client who put a few percent of a stock portfolio into Universa did not see that portfolio multiply forty times. What the client saw was a small, steadily bleeding line item suddenly pay out enough to offset much of the crash in everything else.
That trade-off, losing a little most of the time in exchange for a large payoff in a disaster, is the core of what Spitznagel has done for more than twenty-five years. He learned the discipline behind it as a teenager in the grain pits of Chicago, sharpened it with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, and turned it into a large and controversial business. He has also written two books arguing that the same idea, accepting a small loss now for a bigger advantage later, applies well beyond options.
By the Numbers
Spitznagel and Universa
16Spitznagel's age when he began learning from Chicago grain trader Everett Klipp
$300MAssets Universa launched with in January 2007
100%+Universa's reported return in 2008, the year of the financial crisis
3,612%Reported March 2020 return, calculated on required invested capital rather than total assets
$1B+Payout Bloomberg reported CalPERS forfeited by ending its Universa hedge weeks before the 2020 crash
3.3%Universa allocation in the portfolio the Wall Street Journal described in 2018, with the rest in the S&P 500
The Babe Ruth of the Board of Trade
Spitznagel was born on March 5, 1971, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and grew up in the state. As a teenager he was more interested in music and, by his own later account to Worth magazine, in libertarian politics than in business. He subscribed to National Review and went to hear Ron Paul, then a Texas congressman, speak.
His direction changed when he was about sixteen. A family friend, Everett Klipp, was a veteran corn and soybean trader at the Chicago Board of Trade, and Spitznagel went to watch him work. Klipp had grown up on an Illinois dairy farm during the Depression, served in the Navy in World War II, and spent some fifty years in the pits, where he mentored dozens of young traders. Fortune reported that he was known on the floor as the Babe Ruth of the Board of Trade.
Spitznagel was captivated by the noise and coordination of open-outcry trading. Worth described him hanging a chart of corn prices over his bed and carrying agricultural reports around. He spent summers clerking for Klipp. Forbes reported that he would bring Klipp stacks of research on the grain markets and that Klipp would laugh at it. In Spitznagel's retelling, the old trader told him that all that mattered was to take your small losses.
— Everett Klipp, as quoted in Mark Spitznagel, The Dao of Capital, 2013You've got to love to lose money, hate to make money, love to lose money, hate to make money. . . . But we are human beings, we love to make money, hate to lose money. So we must overcome that humanness about us.
Spitznagel later named this Klipp's Paradox and built much of his first book around it. The instruction was practical. A pit trader who held a losing position in the hope it would come back could be wiped out by one bad day. A trader who sold the moment a position went against him would suffer many small losses and survive to catch the large moves. It took Spitznagel months, he told Worth, to absorb the lesson. Eventually, he said, he could go home happy even after losing money, as long as he had traded the way he meant to.
He never lost his gratitude. In a 2023 interview with Fortune he called Klipp one of the greatest people he had ever known and described meeting him as a kid as his positive black swan event.
From the Bond Pit to the Crisis Years
Spitznagel graduated from Kalamazoo College in 1993. At twenty-two, Forbes reported, he bought a seat at the Chicago Board of Trade and traded Treasury bond and eurodollar futures as an independent local, reportedly one of the youngest in the bond pit. It was a physically demanding, loud and unforgiving place, and a good one for learning Klipp's rule in practice.
He then moved to the trading arm of a Japanese bank, according to Forbes, in time to watch the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the Russian default of 1998. The second of those brought down Long-Term Capital Management, the hedge fund run by celebrated traders and Nobel-winning economists, which lost about $4.6 billion. For Spitznagel, the lesson was that sophisticated models could underestimate rare events, and that the people most confident in their risk estimates might be the most exposed. Forbes wrote that the episode convinced him to develop a style that would profit from panics rather than be destroyed by them.
In 1999 he enrolled in a mathematical finance program at New York University's Courant Institute. One of his teachers there was Nassim Nicholas Taleb, then an adjunct professor and a former options trader who had spent years arguing that markets produce extreme events far more often than standard models assume.
Empirica and the Long Bleed
Spitznagel and Taleb became friends and, in 1999, partners. They launched Empirica Capital, a fund built on a simple and uncomfortable idea: buy large numbers of cheap, far out-of-the-money options that would expire worthless most of the time but pay off enormously in a crash. Taleb was the theorist and public voice. Spitznagel, the trader, handled much of the day-to-day execution.
The approach got attention. Malcolm Gladwell profiled Taleb and Empirica in The New Yorker in 2002 in a piece called "Blowing Up," describing a fund that expected to lose small amounts almost every day. The dot-com collapse gave Empirica some good years at the start of the decade.
The rest of the time was harder. The mid-2000s were calm, with low volatility and steadily rising markets, and a strategy that pays off only in disasters mostly lost money. Empirica was wound down in the mid-2000s. Taleb turned to writing The Black Swan, published in 2007. Spitznagel spent about two years as a proprietary trader at Morgan Stanley, in its Process Driven Trading group.
The Empirica years left Spitznagel with a lesson that later shaped Universa. Tail protection only helps an investor who holds it continuously, including through the long quiet stretches when it looks like a waste of money. A fund that sells nothing but disaster insurance will spend most of its life explaining losses. It needs clients who understand why they own it.
Universa and 2008
In January 2007 Spitznagel founded Universa Investments, with Taleb as an adviser. The firm started with about $300 million under management, working out of a small office in Santa Monica, California, and built software to scan the options markets for the cheapest crash protection it could find. Taleb's title eventually became distinguished scientific adviser. He advised on the strategy and did not manage the money.
The mechanics are simple to state and hard to run. A put option gives its owner the right to sell an asset at a fixed price before a set date. If the strike price is far below the current market, the option is cheap, because the market would have to collapse for it to be worth anything. Most such options expire worthless. But when a crash does come, their value can rise many times over in days, because they become far more likely to pay off at the same moment that fear drives up the price of all options. The skill lies in choosing which strikes and expiries give the most protection per dollar, in rolling the positions continuously, and in knowing when to cash them in.
The timing was remarkable. Within months, the U.S. housing market was breaking down. Through 2008 Universa held put options on the S&P 500 and on financial companies including Goldman Sachs and American International Group, and as the crisis deepened those options soared in value. The firm reported returns of more than 100 percent for 2008. As investors looked for protection after the fact, Universa's assets grew to about $6 billion by 2009.
The experience set the pattern for the firm's reputation. Universa would be known for spectacular numbers in crashes and long stretches of modest losses in between. The headline years made it famous, and the quiet years tested its clients' patience.
In 2014 the firm moved its headquarters from Santa Monica to Miami, a decision widely reported as reflecting Florida's tax and business climate.
The Dao of Capital
In 2013 Spitznagel published his first book, The Dao of Capital: Austrian Investing in a Distorted World. It is an unusual investment book, drawing on the Daoist classic the Laozi, the military strategists Sunzi and Clausewitz, the growth patterns of conifer forests, and above all on the Austrian school of economics, especially Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and Ludwig von Mises.
The organizing idea is what Böhm-Bawerk called roundabout production, which Spitznagel renders with the German word Umweg, a detour. Robinson Crusoe catches more fish in the long run if he first goes hungry for a while to build a boat and a net. A forest's conifers grow slowly in poor soil and eventually outlast the fast-growing trees around them. The investor, in Spitznagel's telling, should accept an immediate disadvantage in order to be positioned for a larger advantage later.
— Mark Spitznagel, The Dao of Capital, 2013Rather than pursue the direct route of immediate gain, we will seek the difficult and roundabout route of immediate loss, an intermediate step which begets an advantage for greater potential gain.
The book's other theme is political. Spitznagel argues that central banks, by holding interest rates artificially low, distort the price signals that coordinate investment, encourage too much debt and speculation, and set up booms that end in busts. That view aligns with his public politics. Wikipedia, citing contemporary reports, notes that alongside Peter Thiel he was a major supporter of Ron Paul's 2012 presidential campaign, and CNBC reported in 2015 that he would serve as a senior economic adviser to Senator Rand Paul's presidential campaign.
Reviewers split. Free-market commentators praised the book. More conventional readers found the Austrian framework and the investment conclusions harder to connect. Paul Tudor Jones, the macro trader, said it showed how a seemingly difficult immediate loss becomes an advantageous intermediate step toward greater gain.
The Pension Fund That Stopped Paying
The case that best illustrates both the value and the difficulty of Spitznagel's product involves the California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest public pension fund in the United States. In 2017 CalPERS hired two outside managers to provide tail-risk protection: Universa, which ran the larger hedge, and LongTail Alpha of Newport Beach.
According to Institutional Investor, CalPERS was paying about 5 basis points a year for the external portion of the program, which protected about $5 billion of assets. In late 2019, under a new chief investment officer, the fund decided the program was too expensive and ended it. Universa had unwound its CalPERS positions by January 2020. A few weeks later the pandemic crash began. Bloomberg reported in April 2020 that by scrapping the Universa hedge, CalPERS had forfeited a payout of more than $1 billion. LongTail's hedge was still being unwound during the crash and returned an estimated $150 million to $175 million.
CalPERS defended its choice. Its chief investment officer, Ben Meng, told Institutional Investor the fund had ended explicit tail-risk hedging because of its high cost, lack of scalability, and the availability of better alternatives, and CalPERS later said those alternatives had offset about $11 billion of losses in the March sell-off.
For Spitznagel's argument, the episode was close to a controlled experiment. The protection did what it was designed to do. The client simply was not holding it when it mattered, because the steady cost had become impossible to justify in a long bull market. CalPERS was also making a reasonable point of its own: at the scale of a fund with hundreds of billions of dollars, a hedge that protects $5 billion is small, and it could argue that cheaper tools did more of the work. Both readings can be true at once. What the episode settled is that tail protection is only as good as the client's willingness to keep paying for it.
Spitznagel has described that willingness as his real advantage. Being able to sit and wait and look like a fool over long periods, he told Business Insider in 2021, is a durable edge precisely because most people, and hedge fund managers especially, cannot do it.
Safe Haven
In 2021 Spitznagel published a second book, Safe Haven: Investing for Financial Storms, with a foreword by Taleb. Where The Dao of Capital was philosophical, Safe Haven is narrowly about portfolio math. Its central claim is that the only test of a risk-mitigation strategy is whether it raises the compound growth rate of the investor's whole portfolio over time.
The argument turns on the difference between arithmetic and geometric returns. An investment that averages a good return but occasionally suffers huge losses can compound far more slowly than its average suggests, because a 50 percent loss requires a 100 percent gain to recover. Spitznagel illustrates this with dice games and simple thought experiments, showing that an asset with a negative average return can still raise a portfolio's long-run growth if it pays off strongly at exactly the moments the rest of the portfolio is collapsing. The idea is closely related to ergodicity, the gap between what happens on average across many investors and what happens to a single investor over time.
From there he attacks the standard tools. Bonds, gold and hedge funds, in his account, usually provide too little protection in a crash to justify the large allocations needed to matter, and so they drag down returns in normal years more than they help in bad ones. He is just as harsh about many of the products now sold under the tail-risk label. Business Insider reported that he calls most of them a cure worse than the disease, because a strategy that makes money in a crash but costs more the rest of the time still lowers the investor's wealth. In the same interview he argued that the investment profession had chosen risk-adjusted returns as its scoreboard because it was easy to win on, when the scoreboard that matters is actual compound returns.
— Mark Spitznagel, Safe Haven, 2021Diversification is a confession that you don't care about cost-effectiveness in your risk mitigation. You want less risk, no matter the cost.
The practical form of the argument appeared in a 2018 Wall Street Journal report, which said a portfolio holding just 3.3 percent in Universa and the rest passively in the S&P 500 had compounded at 12.3 percent a year over the ten years to February 2018, better than the index alone or portfolios with more traditional hedges. Business Insider later reported that an Ernst & Young audit letter put Universa's average annual return on invested capital at 105.2 percent from 2008 through 2019. The point was that a small, highly convex position could let the rest of the portfolio stay fully invested in stocks, a version of the barbell strategy Taleb had long advocated.
The Critics
Spitznagel's claims have drawn sustained criticism, much of it from serious investors.
The first line of criticism is about cost. In April and July 2020, AQR Capital Management, the quantitative firm co-founded by Cliff Asness, published research arguing that systematic put-buying is an expensive way to protect a portfolio and that alternatives such as trend-following have historically done better. Taleb responded angrily on social media, and The Economist covered the ensuing exchange between Taleb and Asness as a debate over whether options insurance belongs in equity portfolios at all. Other analysts, including one writing in Advisor Perspectives, argued that the AQR studies did not model Universa's actual approach. The disagreement has never been settled, partly because the key episodes are rare and the track records short.
The second line is about how Universa reports its results. In April 2023 Bloomberg's Justina Lee described the firm's use of returns on required invested capital as a flashpoint. Boaz Weinstein, founder of Saba Capital and himself a tail-risk investor, publicly challenged Universa to name another fund that reported returns on premiums spent over some interval rather than on assets. Derek Kaufman, formerly Citadel's global head of fixed income, said on social media that none of what Universa was saying made sense. Bloomberg noted that a 3,612 percent return on Universa's roughly $6 billion in stated assets, read the conventional way, would have implied a windfall of more than $200 billion, which is not what happened. Universa's position is that ordinary return measures do not capture what insurance is worth to a whole portfolio.
The third line is about forecasting. Spitznagel is a frequent public voice on the dangers of debt and central bank policy. In early 2023, Bloomberg noted, he warned of the greatest tinderbox-timebomb in financial history, and he told Fortune later that year that markets were in the greatest credit bubble in human history. Critics point out that such warnings have been a constant of his public commentary. Spitznagel, for his part, has said he claims no edge in predicting when a crash will come. Business Insider reported in 2021 that he thinks forecasting should not be part of investing at all.
The Goat Farm
Away from markets, Spitznagel has spent more than a decade on a very different project. In 2010 he and his wife, Amy, bought a run-down property in northern Michigan with a 170-year-old barn, according to Business Insider, and turned it into Idyll Farms, a dairy that raises Alpine goats on pasture and makes chèvre. By the time Business Insider visited in 2021, the farm covered more than 600 acres and kept 300 to 500 goats. Spitznagel told the publication he did not want the credit, which he said belonged to Amy, the farm manager and head cheesemaker Melissa Hiles, and the farm's workers. A Bloomberg Pursuits article in 2017 said the farm was making some of the best goat cheese in America.
The farm fits his ideas more closely than it might first appear. In the same interview he argued that industrial agriculture, like modern finance, looks efficient but is fragile because it depends on government support, citing subsidies for grain, fertilizer, herbicides and cheap oil. Pasture-raised animals and managed grazing, in his view, build soil and health slowly in a way that large corporations seeking immediate results cannot. Forbes titled its 2020 profile "How A Goat Farmer Built A Doomsday Machine," and the phrase stuck.
An Unfinished Argument
More than a quarter century after Empirica, Spitznagel's central idea is both vindicated and unresolved. The crashes of 2008 and 2020 showed that cheap, far out-of-the-money protection could produce enormous payoffs at exactly the moment investors needed cash. The CalPERS episode showed how hard it is for even sophisticated institutions to keep paying for protection through long calm periods. The disputes over how Universa reports its returns and the AQR research show that the question of whether the insurance pays for itself over a full cycle is still argued by capable people on both sides.
What is clear is the consistency of the principle he took from Klipp. Every part of his career, from the bond pit to the books to the farm, turns on the same trade: accept small, visible, frequent losses to avoid the rare catastrophic one and to be ready for the opportunity it creates. Whether that is wisdom or an expensive habit depends, as he would say, on which kind of average you use.
Part IIThe Playbook
Spitznagel's playbook is narrower than most investors' but unusually consistent. It centers on one question: what does a decision do to the long-run compound growth of everything you own? The principles below draw on his two books, his published letters and interviews, and the record of Universa and its clients. They include the uncomfortable parts, because the hardest thing about his approach is living with it.
The principles
- 1.Take the small loss every time.
- 2.Judge a hedge by what it does to the whole portfolio.
- 3.Buy protection that pays out explosively, or don't buy it.
- 4.Keep the insurance small so the core can stay bold.
- 5.Optimize for the compound rate, not the average.
- 6.Design for the drought, not the downpour.
- 7.Make sure clients understand the insurance before the fire.
- 8.Report results in terms outsiders can check.
- 9.Take the detour when the direct route is crowded.
- 10.Find a mentor who teaches discipline, not tips.
- 11.Pair the theorist with the trader.
- 12.Import ideas from outside finance.
Principle 1
Take the small loss every time.
Everett Klipp's first lesson was the whole foundation. A trader who cuts losing positions quickly will be wrong often but will never be wiped out, and survival is what gives him the chance to catch the rare large move. Most people do the opposite because selling at a loss feels like admitting a mistake.
The same logic governs Universa's strategy. Its options expire worthless most of the time, and the firm accepts those small, visible losses as the price of being present for the crash. The discipline is emotional as much as analytical. Spitznagel told Worth that he learned to go home content after a losing day as long as he had traded the way he intended.
Tactic: Before entering any position, write down the exact point at which you will exit at a loss, and judge yourself afterward on whether you followed the rule rather than on whether the trade made money.
Principle 2
Judge a hedge by what it does to the whole portfolio.
The central argument of Safe Haven is that a risk-mitigation strategy has only one job: to raise the long-run growth rate of the investor's total wealth. A hedge that looks good on its own but costs more in normal years than it saves in bad ones has failed, however reassuring it feels.
This changes how you evaluate almost everything. A standalone fund's return, volatility or Sharpe ratio says little about whether it helps the portfolio it sits in. The CalPERS episode shows the same thing in reverse: a program that looked like a steady cost in isolation was, for the portfolio as a whole, worth more than $1 billion in the moment it mattered.
Tactic: For every defensive holding, calculate how your total portfolio would have performed over a full cycle with and without it, including at least one major crash, before deciding whether to keep it.
Principle 3
Buy protection that pays out explosively, or don't buy it.
Spitznagel's critique of bonds, gold and conventional hedge funds is that they protect too little in a crash. To make a real difference, an investor has to hold a lot of them, and that large allocation drags down returns the rest of the time. His preferred instrument, far out-of-the-money put options, costs little and can pay off many times over in a collapse.
He calls this the trade-off between crash payoff and cost. The bigger the payout in a disaster, the smaller the allocation you need, and the less the cost in normal times matters. This is the idea behind asymmetric upside, applied to defense instead of offense.
Tactic: For any hedge, estimate how much it would pay in a severe crash per dollar spent on it each year, and discard those whose payoff is too small to matter at a modest allocation.
Principle 4
Keep the insurance small so the core can stay bold.
The portfolio the Wall Street Journal described in 2018, 3.3 percent in Universa and the rest in the S&P 500, shows the structure. A small, highly convex position handles the worst outcomes, which lets the other 96.7 percent stay fully invested in stocks rather than being diluted with safer assets.
It is Taleb's barbell in practice: extreme safety on one end, full risk on the other, and very little in the middle. Confidence in the downside protection is what makes it rational to take real risk with the rest.
Tactic: If you hold a large allocation to cautious assets purely out of fear, test whether a much smaller, more targeted form of protection would let you take more risk with the rest.
Principle 5
Optimize for the compound rate, not the average.
A 50 percent loss requires a 100 percent gain to recover. That arithmetic is why Spitznagel insists the geometric return, the rate at which wealth actually compounds, matters more than the average return. Large losses do disproportionate damage over time, and avoiding them can matter more than extra gains in good years.
This is ergodicity applied to a single investor's life. A bet can look attractive on average across many people and still ruin the individual who makes it repeatedly. Spitznagel's dice examples in Safe Haven are designed to make that gap intuitive.
Tactic: When comparing strategies, look at their compound annual growth over a long period that includes crashes, not their average annual return, and give heavy weight to the size of the worst drawdown.
Principle 6
Design for the drought, not the downpour.
Empirica's hardest years were the calm ones in the mid-2000s, when a strategy built for crashes lost money steadily and was eventually wound down. Universa's reputation rests on 2008 and 2020, but most of its life has been spent in the quiet periods in between.
A strategy that pays off only occasionally has to be built to survive years of small losses, financially and psychologically. That means sizing positions so the bleed is tolerable, keeping costs low, and having capital and clients that will stay through long stretches without a payoff.
Tactic: Estimate the longest period your strategy could go without paying off, and make sure your costs, your capital, and your own patience could survive twice that long.
Principle 7
Make sure clients understand the insurance before the fire.
CalPERS paid for crash protection from 2017 through 2019, then ended the Universa program because of its cost, weeks before the pandemic crash. Bloomberg reported it forfeited more than $1 billion. The product worked. The client relationship did not hold through the calm.
For anyone selling protection, the hard part is not the crash but the years before it. A client who does not understand why the insurance looks like a steady loss will eventually cancel it, often at the worst possible time. Education and expectation-setting are part of the product.
Tactic: Before a client buys anything with an irregular payoff, show them in writing how many years of small losses they should expect, and revisit that document every year.
Principle 8
Report results in terms outsiders can check.
Universa's practice of reporting returns on required invested capital produced headlines like 3,612 percent and also produced sustained criticism from investors such as Boaz Weinstein. The firm argues that ordinary return measures misstate what insurance is worth. Critics argue that the non-standard figures invite misunderstanding.
Whatever the merits, the dispute shows the cost of unconventional reporting. When a number is easy to misread, part of the audience will conclude it is being misused, and the argument shifts from the strategy to the arithmetic. A firm with a genuinely unusual product needs to show how its numbers translate into the terms everyone else uses.
Tactic: If you report performance in a non-standard way, publish alongside it the conventional equivalent, with a plain explanation of the difference.
Principle 9
Take the detour when the direct route is crowded.
The Dao of Capital is built on the idea of the Umweg, the roundabout route. Crusoe goes hungry to build a net and then catches far more fish. The investor accepts a disadvantage now to gain a better position later. Spitznagel argues that because most market participants focus on the immediate, the roundabout path is persistently underused.
The principle extends beyond options. Building a skill, a business or, in his case, a pasture-based farm often means accepting slow early progress in return for a sturdier result. The direct route is crowded because it is obvious.
Tactic: For your next major decision, identify the option that looks worst in the next six months but best in five years, and give it a serious hearing before choosing the easy one.
Principle 10
Find a mentor who teaches discipline, not tips.
Klipp laughed at the stacks of research the teenage Spitznagel brought him. What he taught instead was a rule about behavior: take the small loss. Spitznagel has credited that one lesson, learned at sixteen, as the foundation of his career.
The most valuable teachers often pass on habits rather than information. Market views go out of date, but a discipline for handling risk and emotion stays useful for decades. Finding someone who has survived a long career and learning how they behave may matter more than learning what they think.
Tactic: Seek out one practitioner in your field with thirty or more years of survival, and ask them not what they predict but which rule they have never broken.
Principle 11
Pair the theorist with the trader.
Taleb brought the theory of fat tails, a public voice and a network. Spitznagel brought pit-trading experience and the discipline of execution. Their partnership began at Empirica, continued at Universa, and has lasted more than two decades, with Taleb as adviser and Spitznagel as the one managing the money.
Ideas about markets are cheap. Turning them into positions that can be sized, financed and held through bad years takes a different skill. Partnerships that combine the two, with clear roles, can do what neither partner could manage alone.
Tactic: If you are strong on ideas, find a partner who is strong on execution, or the reverse, and agree in writing on who makes which decisions.
Principle 12
Import ideas from outside finance.
Spitznagel's books draw on Daoist philosophy, military strategy, forest ecology and Austrian economics far more than on standard portfolio theory. Whatever one thinks of the conclusions, that range has helped him frame arguments that sound different from those of most money managers, and it made his case memorable.
Fields outside finance have long experience with patience, resilience and rare disasters. Borrowing their frameworks can reveal assumptions that finance takes for granted, such as the idea that risk reduction must always cost return.
Tactic: Read one serious book each quarter from a field unrelated to your work, and write down one idea from it that challenges an assumption in your own practice.
Free playbook
Get The Business Model Playbook
58 business models, one visual page each: how the money flows, the metrics that matter, and who runs it. Free when you join the Faster Than Normal email.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Part IIIMaxims
- Survival is the first return. No compounding happens after a wipeout, so staying in the game comes before any profit target.
- Cheap protection is the only protection worth scaling. Expensive hedges can only be held in small doses, which usually means they don't matter.
- The bleed is the business. A strategy built for rare payoffs spends most of its life losing small amounts, and has to be run with that in mind.
- Calm markets fire the insurer. Long bull runs make protection look wasteful right before it is needed.
- Big percentages invite big questions. A figure no one can reconcile with ordinary math will be doubted, however it was calculated.
- Averages flatter. A strategy's typical year says little about what its worst year will do to a lifetime of savings.
- Patience needs a structure. Good intentions do not survive years of losses unless the position size and client agreements make waiting bearable.
- Old traders teach behavior. The rules that last in markets are about conduct under pressure, not about what happens next.
- Soil builds slowly. The most durable gains, on a farm or in a portfolio, come from processes that look unproductive in the first seasons.
In Their Own Words
We were not trying to predict when the next crisis would occur, but rather positioning ourselves to benefit when it inevitably did.— Mark Spitznagel
The goal is not to predict crashes, but to be positioned to benefit from them when they occur, while minimizing the cost of that protection during normal times.— Mark Spitznagel
The Austrian investor seeks to profit from the market's natural tendency toward disequilibrium, rather than assuming that markets are efficient and prices are always correct.— Mark Spitznagel
The farm teaches you that you cannot control complex systems, but you can position yourself to benefit from their natural tendencies toward growth and renewal.— Mark Spitznagel
We are not trying to predict when the next crisis will occur, but rather positioning ourselves to benefit when it inevitably does.— Mark Spitznagel
True diversification comes not from holding many different assets that all go down together, but from holding assets that respond differently to the same underlying forces.— Mark Spitznagel
The market rewards those who can accept small, frequent losses in exchange for large, infrequent gains. Most investors do the opposite.— Mark Spitznagel
Risk is not volatility. Risk is the possibility of permanent loss of capital. Volatility, properly harnessed, can be a source of returns.— Mark Spitznagel
The greatest risk is not taking enough risk. By trying to eliminate all uncertainty, investors often ensure their own mediocrity.— Mark Spitznagel
Black swan events are not rare exceptions to normal market behavior—they are an integral part of how markets function and evolve.— Mark Spitznagel
Insurance is not about predicting when bad things will happen. It's about being prepared when they do.— Mark Spitznagel
The cost of protection is not the premium you pay—it's the opportunity cost of not being protected when you need it most.— Mark Spitznagel
Central bank intervention doesn't eliminate risk—it concentrates it and makes it more dangerous when it finally manifests.— Mark Spitznagel
Malinvestment is not a bug in the economic system—it's a feature of any system where prices are artificially distorted.— Mark Spitznagel
The Austrian school teaches us that economic calculation is impossible without genuine market prices. When those prices are distorted, miscalculation is inevitable.— Mark Spitznagel
Creative destruction is not something to be prevented—it's the mechanism by which economies grow and adapt.— Mark Spitznagel
The attempt to eliminate business cycles doesn't make them disappear—it makes them more severe when they finally occur.— Mark Spitznagel
The roundabout path often leads to better destinations than the direct route. This is true in production, and it's true in investing.— Mark Spitznagel
Time preference is the most important concept in investing that no one talks about. Those who can wait are rewarded by those who cannot.— Mark Spitznagel
The market's greatest gift to patient investors is its impatience. Every crisis creates opportunities for those prepared to act.— Mark Spitznagel
Compound returns are not just about mathematics—they're about psychology. The ability to stay the course through difficult periods is what separates successful investors from the rest.— Mark Spitznagel
The best investment strategies are often the most boring. Excitement in investing is usually expensive.— Mark Spitznagel
Nature doesn't optimize for efficiency—it optimizes for survival. Investors should do the same.— Mark Spitznagel
Complex systems are not predictable, but they are understandable. The key is to work with their natural patterns rather than against them.— Mark Spitznagel
The most robust systems are those that maintain optionality—keeping multiple paths open rather than committing to a single course of action.— Mark Spitznagel
The crowd is right about direction but wrong about timing and magnitude. Understanding this asymmetry is the key to successful contrarian investing.— Mark Spitznagel
When everyone believes something is impossible, that's usually when it becomes inevitable.— Mark Spitznagel
The market's biggest mistakes come not from ignorance, but from false confidence. Certainty is the enemy of good investment decisions.— Mark Spitznagel
Popular strategies become unprofitable precisely because they are popular. The key is to find approaches that remain effective even when widely known.— Mark Spitznagel
The best opportunities are often hiding in plain sight, disguised as problems that everyone else is trying to avoid.— Mark Spitznagel
Resilience comes not from avoiding stress, but from building systems that become stronger under stress.— Mark Spitznagel
Further reading
- The Dao of Capital: Austrian Investing in a Distorted World by Mark Spitznagel
