Skip to content
Portrait of Charles Merrill

Charles Merrill

Co-founder of Merrill Lynch, which grew into the largest brokerage in the world.

By Updated

Who is Charles Merrill?

Built Merrill Lynch around selling securities to ordinary investors, using honest direct-mail sales, and underwrote the growth of retail chains such as Safeway, J. C. Penney and S. S. Kresge.

Category
Investor
Industry
Finance & Banking
Born
1800s

Part IThe Story

One Hundred Dollars as Full Quittance

In the early 1950s, the three grown children of the most famous stockbroker in America agreed to accept $100 apiece from their father's estate. The figure was not a typo, and it was not $100,000. It was one hundred dollars, "as full quittance," a phrase with the dry chill of a release form, which is what the document was. Doris, the eldest, was married to Robert Magowan, the man who ran Safeway. Charles Jr. was a schoolmaster in St. Louis who had come home from the Fifth Army having pulled a teenage Holocaust orphan out of Germany and put him on a path to Harvard Law School. James was the youngest, a poet, and the one who would eventually write it down, in the sixteenth chapter of a memoir called A Different Person, published in 1993, nearly four decades after the old man was buried in Palm Beach.
Their father was still alive when they signed. He was ailing, and had been since the first heart attack in 1944, and he governed the largest brokerage on earth from houses on Long Island and in Florida, mostly by way of a trusted partner named Winthrop Smith. The renunciation cost the children nothing they needed. Charles Merrill had seen to that years before, with irrevocable trusts set up when they were small. The $100 was a redirection, not a sacrifice. Ninety-five percent of a $25 million estate would go instead to hospitals, churches, and schools.
Still, consider the shape of it. The man whose life's work had been persuading strangers in Topeka and Shreveport and Fort Wayne that they too deserved a share, that ownership was a birthright and not a club, had raised three children who arranged formally, in writing, to own less of him. He sold the country on the idea of a stake. His own heirs declined theirs.
Charles Edward Merrill was, depending on who was describing him, a visionary who "brought Wall Street to Main Street," a southern drugstore boy with a gift for odds, a bridge-playing bore with "trophy wives," the only established broker who saw 1929 coming, and, in the 1998 judgment of Time, a "short, self-absorbed, prideful, flamboyant fellow" who "made the gossip pages as regularly as the financial pages." All of these descriptions are accurate. None of them is sufficient. The puzzle of Merrill is not which version is true. It is how a man so thoroughly devoted to his own appetites built an institution premised on restraint, on telling the customer the boring truth and keeping his interests first, and why that institution, once he was gone, forgot.
By the Numbers

The Merrill Ledger

3,500+Safeway stores by 1931, five years after Merrill orchestrated the merger that created the chain
$6,000,000Estimated savings to Merrill's customers from his 1928 warning, per The New York Times
23,000Miles of private telegraph wire controlled by E. A. Pierce & Co. by 1938, inherited in the 1940 merger
400,000Clients of Merrill Lynch at the time of his death in 1956
$100Amount each of his three children accepted 'as full quittance' of further inheritance
95%Share of his $25 million estate directed to hospitals, churches, and educational causes
$114MDisbursed by the Charles E. Merrill Trust over its 23 years of operation

The Current at White Sulfur Spring

Green Cove Springs, on the St. Johns River south of Jacksonville, was in the 1890s a town of two populations: the people who lived there and the people who came down from the North each winter to escape what one local historian called the "bitter, killing cold" of the cities. Industrialists. Invalids. Tourists with money. At the center of the town was the White Sulfur Spring and its pool, and at the center of the pool, on any given summer day, were the town's ten-year-old boys.
One of them was Doc Merrill's son. Charles Morton Merrill had trained as a physician in New York, followed the lure of Florida, bought an orange grove, and opened a drugstore and soda fountain next to his medical office. He married Octavia Wilson, of a large Clay County family. Their first child, Charles, arrived on October 19, 1885. A sister, Edith, came seven years later, and the gap left the boy largely to his own devices.
The story that survives, recounted by the Clay County columnist Mary Jo McTammany in 2018, more than a century after the fact, goes like this. Young Charlie took bets from tourists that he could swim the length of the pool on a single breath. The bettors, reasonably, took the other side. What they did not know was that the spring fed the pool with a stream running at roughly 3,000 gallons per minute, and that a boy who dove deep enough could catch it and simply ride it to the far end. He knew the outcome before anyone put money down. When his face became too familiar to the regulars, he farmed the scheme out to a group of friends and took a commission.
The tale has the high polish of something told many times, and a careful reader should hold it at a slight distance. It is also too good to discard, because nearly every important decision Merrill made as an adult can be read as a variation on it: an understanding of where the current runs, a willingness to let others take the visible risk, and a preference for a cut of a repeatable process over a single dazzling bet. The odds were never the point. The plumbing was.
He worked the soda fountain. He had a paper route. He saw, from behind the drugstore counter, what a small retail business looked like from the inside: inventory, margins, the slow arithmetic of repeat customers. Merrill's later fascination with chain stores, the historian Edwin Perkins argues, began there.
The family moved to Knoxville in 1898 and came back within the year, settling in Jacksonville. When the Great Fire of 1901 damaged his school, his parents sent him to the preparatory academy run by John B. Stetson University, then, for a final year, north to Worcester Academy in Massachusetts on a partial athletic scholarship. He went on to Amherst in 1904 and left in 1906 without a degree. The two years were not wasted. They gave him Massachusetts, a set of manners, and a network of Amherst men (Calvin Coolidge among the alumni, Winthrop Smith among the younger ones) that would matter later in ways no transcript could have predicted.
Between Amherst and everything else came a run of jobs that read, on paper, like drift. He wrote for the Tropical Sun in West Palm Beach, which he would later call "the best training I ever had; I learned human nature." He did a year at the University of Michigan Law School, 1906 to 1907, and abandoned it. And in the summer of 1907 he played minor-league baseball in Mississippi.
Winthrop Smith Jr., son of Merrill's eventual partner, opens his history of the firm, Catching Lightning in a Bottle, in Shaw, Mississippi, in August 1907. Wooden sidewalks on either side of a single dirt street. Nine churches on one side of town, four white and five black. On the other side, along Porter's Bayou, at least as many brothels and saloons. On game day all of them closed, and everyone went out to the ball park. The home team supplied the umpires. The betting was heavy.
Merrill did not have the talent for the major leagues, and it became clear quickly. But it is worth dwelling for a moment on what he saw that summer: a small American town where everyone, saint and sinner, black church and white, turned out for the same contest and put money on it. The national pastime was a mass market. So, it would turn out, was the nation's capital.

Mr. Average Investor

He arrived in New York in the autumn of 1907, the year of the Panic, and needed a place to sleep. He found it in the room of a young stockbroker at the 23rd Street YMCA.
Edmund Calvert Lynch had been born in Baltimore on May 19, 1885, five months before Merrill. He was of Irish descent, the son of Richard H. Lynch and Jennie Vernon Smith Lynch, and had gone to the Boys' Latin School of Maryland and then to Johns Hopkins, which he finished in 1907. He was, in other words, nearly Merrill's exact contemporary and his near-opposite in temperament. Where Merrill was the talker and the theorist, Lynch was the closer, the man who checked the numbers twice. The two shared the room, talked late about starting a brokerage, and became friends of the lasting kind.
Merrill's first New York job came through a prospective father-in-law: a post in the office of Patchogue-Plymouth Mills, a textile concern on Long Island. The romance did not last. The education did. He later described the work as "the equivalent of a university course in general, and credit, finance, cost accounting, and administration, in particular," which is perhaps the most enthusiastic thing any man has ever said about a textile mill's back office.
In 1909 he moved to George H. Burr & Company, a commercial-paper house whose owner had heard about him and wanted someone to build a new bond department. Merrill hired his roommate to handle sales. And here, at twenty-four, he began doing something that looks obvious only in retrospect. He sold by direct mail, and he told the truth.
This needs some context. Wall Street before the Securities and Exchange Commission was, to put it gently, a rigged game. Sales managers told brokers which shares to push, often because the house held a large position and wanted to unload it before the price collapsed. Customer relationships were short, transactional, and frequently predatory. Merrill's circulars, by contrast, were informative and accurate. His reasoning was commercial, not moral, or at least it was presented that way. A broad customer base, he argued, was more stable than a narrow rich one: "having thousands of customers scattered throughout the United States is infinitely preferable to being dependent upon the fluctuating buying power of a smaller and perhaps on the whole wealthier group of investors in any one section."
In 1911 he put the argument in print, in an article for Leslie's Illustrated Weekly titled "Mr. Average Investor." It said that brokers placed their firms' interests ahead of their customers', that this was unethical, and, here is the Merrill twist, that it was also stupid, because long relationships were more profitable than quick kills. Ethics as a growth strategy. He would spend the next forty-five years proving the thesis, and the half-century after his death would supply, unintentionally, the control group.
After a year's detour at Eastman Dillon, he went out on his own. On January 6, 1914, Charles E. Merrill & Co. opened for business at 7 Wall Street. Lynch joined a few months later, and in 1915 the name became Merrill, Lynch & Co., with a comma between the partners, a small punctuation mark that would survive until 1938.
In 1916 a young Amherst man named Winthrop H. Smith joined the firm. Smith would wait a long time for his moment, nearly a quarter-century of it, and would get his name on the door only after Merrill was dead. His son would spend twenty-eight years at the company and write its history. Smith is the patient one in this story, the man who held the institution together while its founder held court.

The Chains

Here is the drugstore boy's insight, stated plainly: the American corner store was about to be replaced by the American chain store, and the chains would need capital.
It sounds like hindsight now. In the 1910s it was a minority view, and Merrill held it early and hard. The Harvard Business School, which lists him among the great American business leaders of the twentieth century, credits him as "the first investment banker to realize that chain stores would one day dominate retailing." Merrill Lynch handled underwriting for at least twenty-five retail chains. The roster reads like a map of mid-century American shopping: S. S. Kresge, the forerunner of Kmart; McCrory; J. C. Penney; Kinney; First National Stores; and, eventually and above all, Safeway.
A successful $1,250,000 stock offering before the First World War earned the young firm its reputation. Not every bet landed. A foray into financing automobile manufacturers went, as one economist put it, largely nowhere. Another detour, into motion pictures, turned out to be fortuitous and highly lucrative: in 1921 the firm bought Pathé Exchange, the American arm of the pioneering French studio, which later became part of RKO Pictures. But movies were a sideline. The chains were the business.
What Merrill understood about chain stores went beyond the observation that they were growing. He understood why. A chain standardized the product, cut the margin, multiplied the locations, and made its money on volume. It trained its clerks to a common script. It put the same goods in the same places in a thousand towns, so that a housewife in Oakland and a housewife in Denver had roughly the same experience. It was retail as a system rather than as a shopkeeper's personality. And it served the broad middle of the country rather than the carriage trade.
In 1926 Merrill orchestrated the merger that created Safeway Stores, and his firm then financed its acquisition of other chains. By 1931 Safeway operated more than 3,500 stores across the United States and was the country's third-largest grocery chain. Merrill became, and remained, its largest shareholder. In 1932, under Safeway's auspices, he founded Family Circle magazine, which was handed out at grocery checkouts, a publication designed to reach precisely the households Wall Street had never bothered to court.
In the same year as the Safeway merger, 1926, he bought the James L. Breese House in Southampton, a thirty-acre estate called the Orchard, partly designed by Stanford White, with grounds originally laid out by Frederick Law Olmsted. Keep both purchases in mind together. The grocery chain for the middle class and the Gilded Age estate for himself. Merrill never saw a contradiction there. That was rather the point of him.

Now Is the Time to Get Out of Debt

The Dow Jones industrial average rose roughly 50 percent in 1928. Everyone was making money, which is the most dangerous sentence in finance, and in that year, by The New York Times' later account, only two men of standing in the financial community were "almost alone in sensing possible disaster": the statistician Roger Babson and Charles Merrill.
Merrill was the lesser-known of the two. The Times obituary would note, with a delicacy that reads now as faintly comic, that he "did not carry enough weight with his customers to depress the market." He could not stop the boom. He could only step out of its way and try to bring his clients with him.
He went first to the top. Merrill pleaded with President Calvin Coolidge, a fellow Amherst man, to speak out publicly against speculation. Coolidge did not. (The silent president remained silent. There is a whole essay to be written on that fact alone.)
Then he went to the mail, which was where Merrill had always been most persuasive. On December 17, 1928, his firm sent its clients a market letter. It is one of the more remarkable documents in the history of American finance, not for its eloquence, which is modest, but for its timing, which was perfect.
Now is the time to get out of debt. We think you should know that with a few exceptions all the larger companies financed by us today have no funded debt. This is not the result of luck but of carefully considered plans on the part of their managements and ourselves to place these companies in an impregnable position.
— Merrill, Lynch & Co. market letter to clients, December 17, 1928
The letter continued: "We do not urge you to sell securities indiscriminately, but we advise you in no uncertain terms that you take advantage of present high prices and put your own financial house in order. We recommend that you sell enough securities to lighten your obligations, or better yet, pay them entirely."
Note the register. Not "sell everything." Not a prophecy of doom. A sober, specific instruction that the reader could actually act on: pay off your margin. It is the voice of the 1911 Leslie's article grown up: honest, unglamorous, aimed at Mr. Average Investor's actual balance sheet. Harvard's profile goes further, crediting Merrill as the only established broker who liquidated his own firm's stock portfolio ahead of the crash.
At the time of the crash it was estimated that his foresight had saved his customers more than $6 million. Many years later, asked how he had known, Merrill gave an answer of such deflating plainness that it reads almost like a taunt: "The lesson that I had learned — when stocks are too high they come down — stood me in good stead in 1928-29."
A small digression, because the reporting voice is obliged to admit it. The authorship of that letter is, in the strange afterlife of internet history, contested. As of 2025, the Wikipedia page for Edmund Lynch attributed both the letter and the prediction to Lynch, while the page itself carried a dispute banner noting that "public information suggests it was Charles E. Merrill." The Times, writing in 1956 when both men were dead, gave it to Merrill without hesitation, as do Britannica, Perkins, and Harvard. The partners signed as a firm. Merrill was the one who would not shut up about it. It is entirely in keeping with both men that the credit should still be drifting between them nearly a century later, and entirely in keeping with Merrill that most of it settled on him.
What happened next is the part that makes Merrill hard to categorize. Having been right, spectacularly and almost alone, he quit.
In 1930 Merrill Lynch spun off its retail brokerage business to E. A. Pierce & Co., transferring most of its employees with it, Lynch and Smith among them, and keeping only a minority interest. The firm retreated to investment banking and, in practice, to dormancy. The man who had just demonstrated the most valuable skill in finance, the ability to read a market, walked away from the market. He had seen the current reverse. He did not need to swim against it to prove anything.

A Grocer's Decade

For most of the 1930s, Charles Merrill was a grocer.
Not officially. He was not a director of Safeway and held no title. But he was its largest shareholder and, functionally, its chief financial officer, and the management of the chain was in the hands of a chief executive he had picked himself, Marion Skaggs. The historian Edwin Perkins, whose Wall Street to Main Street: Charles Merrill and Middle-Class Investors remains the only full biography, calls this "the Safeway decade," and treats it not as an interruption but as an apprenticeship. Merrill spent ten years inside a consumer business that lived on economies of scale, on thin margins and high volume and the discipline of the systematized store. The lessons would prove decisive.
His old partner took a different path. Lynch, by Perkins' account, enjoyed "a retirement of pleasure and travel." He married Signa Janney Fornaris in the 1920s and had three children. He died in London, on business, on May 12, 1938, a week short of his fifty-third birthday. In his will he left $59,000 to the Johns Hopkins medical school in the name of his brother. It is a small, precise, sentimental bequest, the kind of thing a careful man arranges, and it is almost all the record tells us about his private heart. In the same year, the comma between the two names on the old letterhead was quietly dropped.
There is a coda to the Lynch family story that no novelist would dare invent. Lynch's daughter, Vernon, married a man named Robert G. Merrill, the son of one Joseph Merrill, no relation to Charles. The partners' names were joined, a second time, by accident.
Meanwhile, at E. A. Pierce & Co., the brokerage business Merrill had shed was becoming the largest in America and, simultaneously, quietly going broke. Edward Allen Pierce had joined the old house of A. A. Housman & Company in 1901, became a partner in 1915, and made himself managing partner in 1921. (The Housman partnership, as it happens, traced its founding to 1885, the year of Merrill's birth; the firm Merrill would eventually absorb was, to the year, his exact twin.) Pierce built the firm into a national network of branches strung together by telegraph. By 1938 it controlled a private wire system running more than 23,000 miles, the largest in the business. It introduced IBM machines to its record-keeping. It was, by the standards of the day, extraordinarily innovative.
It was also thinly capitalized, losing money, and by the end of the decade on the verge of bankruptcy. Pierce had built the pipes. He had not figured out how to make anyone want to pour money through them.

Keeping the Lynch Name

In 1939, with Lynch dead and the firm sliding, Winthrop Smith went to see Merrill. Smith had been with Pierce since the 1930 transfer and knew its condition intimately. He proposed a merger: Merrill's capital and authority, Pierce's network, and Merrill's ideas, which by then had been sitting unused for a decade.
Merrill agreed. He insisted on one condition about the name. The combined firm would keep "Lynch."
Pause on that. Eddie Lynch had been dead for more than a year and had left the business a decade before. There was no estate to placate, no partner to flatter. Merrill could have put his own name on the door alone and nobody would have blinked. Instead he kept his friend's, from the YMCA room on 23rd Street, as if the two names together were a single word, which, in American usage, they would become.
On April 1, 1940, Merrill Lynch merged with E. A. Pierce & Co. and with Cassatt & Co., a Philadelphia brokerage in which both firms held interests. The new firm was called Merrill Lynch, E. A. Pierce & Cassatt. Two days earlier, on March 29, The New York Times had run the announcement under a headline that reads, to modern eyes, like a mission statement typed by a telegraph operator: "NEW FIRM PLANS CHANGES IN POLICY; Merrill Lynch, E.A. Pierce & Cassatt to Put Emphasis on Customer-Contact. MERCHANDISING A FACTOR. Branch Offices to Be Reduced In Size, Says Merrill — 40 Partners Listed."
Merchandising. Customer contact. Smaller branches. Here was the Safeway decade, transposed into securities.
What Merrill did next, in roughly four years between 1940 and the heart attacks, is the core of his claim to importance, and it is worth stating precisely. He looked at the life insurance industry, which had succeeded beyond anyone's imagination at collecting the savings of middle-class American households, and asked why stockbrokers could not do the same. His answer was that people did not trust brokers, and that they were right not to. So he set out to make the brokers trustworthy, or at least to build a firm in which trustworthiness was structurally rewarded.
The reforms, as Perkins and later accounts describe them, were concrete. Brokers would be paid salaries rather than commissions alone, which blunted the incentive to churn customer accounts. Research would be separated from the investment-banking side, so that the analysts' recommendations would not be bent to serve the firm's underwriting clients. The firm would explain itself to the public. In 1941 Merrill Lynch became the first firm on Wall Street to publish an annual report, an act that in the context of a profession built on opacity was roughly equivalent to a magician publishing his methods.
The same year brought Fenner & Beane, a New Orleans investment bank and commodities house that had been, through the 1930s, consistently the second-largest securities firm in the country. The combined Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Beane was now, plainly, the leader in American brokerage.
The ambition was national and the methods were folksy. Merrill instructed his people to hold investment seminars at which husbands and wives could leave their children with child care while they learned how they, too, could buy stock. The gesture was inclusive and also, as one dry modern annotator on his Wikipedia page observes, a familiar sales technique: with both spouses present, "neither spouse will be able to say, 'let me check with my wife (or husband) before I decide.'" Both readings are correct. Merrill never saw any tension between doing the decent thing and closing the sale. His career was an extended argument that they were the same thing.
By 1940 the firm had branches in most of the hundred largest American cities. By 1950 it had more than a hundred offices. The slogan, which became a kind of national cliché, was "Bring Wall Street to Main Street." The phrase came easily to a boy from a town with one street.
Then his heart gave out. A series of attacks in 1944 and 1945 left him partially incapacitated, and he rarely visited the firm again. He directed it from Long Island and Florida, through Win Smith, who ran the company day to day from 1940 onward. Merrill's influence remained, by every account, enormous. But the decisive work was done, and done fast. The man who had spent the 1930s waiting got about four years of full health in which to build the thing he would be remembered for.
He died at his home on Dune Road in Southampton on the night of October 6, 1956, of complications from his heart condition, thirteen days short of his seventy-first birthday. His firm had 400,000 clients. The Times obituary called him "a mine of provocative ideas about how to interest the little and often Wall Street-shy man in acquiring a stake in his country's economy." It noted that his funeral would be held at the Church of the Ascension, on Fifth Avenue at Tenth Street, and that he would be buried in Palm Beach.
Fourteen months later, on December 31, 1957, the Times reported that the firm would change its name once more, dropping "Beane" in favor of "Smith," to honor "the man who has been largely responsible for making the name of a brokerage house part of an American saga." The paper called the old name "a sonorous bit of Americana." Win Smith, the patient one, had finally made the door.

Good Time Charlie

None of this was the work of a modest man.
His friends called him "Good Time Charlie." He married three times: to Eliza Church in 1912, with whom he had Doris and Charles Jr.; to Helen Ingram in 1925, with whom he had James, a marriage that ended in divorce in 1937; and to Kenta Des More in 1939, a marriage that ended in divorce in 1952. His extramarital affairs were numerous and not especially secret. He referred to them, according to the 1998 Time profile by Joseph Nocera, as "recharging my batteries."
He collected houses the way he collected companies. The Orchard in Southampton, with its Stanford White rooms and its Olmsted grounds. A townhouse at 18 West 11th Street in Greenwich Village in the 1920s. Merrill's Landing in Palm Beach, where he spent his last years. The house on Dune Road where he died.
The Kirkus reviewer of Perkins' biography, unimpressed, concluded that the book made Merrill seem "less a visionary than a comic strip bigwig," a man with "penchants for bridge, obedience to his commands, and, not least, trophy wives." This is unkind and not entirely unfair. Nocera, more generous, found in him an optimism "naive and exaggerated" and "unshakable, even in the face of the darker reality he saw all around him." Which is odd, if you think about it, because the one moment for which Merrill is most celebrated, December 1928, was the moment he saw the darker reality more clearly than almost anyone. He was an optimist about the country and a realist about prices. The two dispositions lived in him without visible friction, along with a third, a gargantuan appetite, which made both of them run.
His children were the ones who felt the friction. All three were made rich early, by trusts their father could not revoke. The youngest described what that was like.
As it happened, my father had taken a much earlier step to ensure his children's independence, by creating an unbreakable trust in each of our names. Thus at five years old I was rich, and would hold my own pursestrings when I came of age, whether I liked it or not. I wasn't sure I did like it.
— James Merrill, A Different Person: A Memoir (1993)
James went on: "The best-intentioned people, knowing whose son I was and powerless against their own snobbery, could set me writhing under attentions I had done nothing to merit."
Independence is the word to watch. The father meant the trusts as a gift of freedom, freedom from him, from the firm, from the need to earn. The son received them as something closer to a brand, a name that preceded him into every room. James became one of the most distinguished American poets of the late twentieth century. He used his money to found the Ingram Merrill Foundation to support writers and artists, the name joining his mother's maiden name to his father's, which is itself a small act of authorship, of rearranging an inheritance. In 1957, the year after his father died, he published a novel, The Seraglio, widely read as a portrait of the old man's womanizing. He dedicated it to his ten nephews and nieces. The Times obituary, a year earlier, had listed Charles Merrill as survived by ten grandchildren. Same ten. One generation's gossip, addressed to the next.
There is a footnote about the townhouse on West 11th Street that belongs here, though it happened long after Merrill was gone. On March 6, 1970, the building was destroyed when dynamite being handled carelessly by members of the Weather Underground, the radical group dedicated to overthrowing the system Merrill had spent his life democratizing, exploded. The revolutionaries were not targeting him; they did not need to. It was simply the house. The founder of people's capitalism had, decades earlier, owned the building in which the would-be destroyers of capitalism accidentally blew themselves apart. History does not do irony on purpose. It does not have to.
And there is the matter of the name, which has always caused confusion. A different Charles Merrill, Charles Edmund Merrill Jr., president of a New York textbook house, assisted Judge John M. Woolsey in the case that admitted Ulysses into the United States, and generations of readers have credited the broker. Wikipedia lists six notable Charles Merrills. The broker's own son was the seventh, and in some respects the most important.

The Herd Without the Shepherd

After Merrill's death, the firm did what he had designed it to do, and then, over decades, did what he had designed it not to do.
In 1952 it formed a holding company and incorporated, after nearly half a century as a partnership. In 1958 it became Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, the largest securities firm in the world, with offices in more than ninety-eight cities. In 1974 it adopted the bull. Its army of brokers, eventually some 15,000 strong, became known as the "thundering herd," and the herd let Merrill place the securities it underwrote directly with the public, something old-line houses like Morgan Stanley could not do. Main Street had become a distribution channel.
The decades that followed are a matter of public record, and the record is mixed in a way that sharpens rather than diminishes the founder's achievement. In 2002, the firm agreed to pay $100 million to settle charges of publishing misleading research, and as part of the agreement promised to "decouple research from investment banking," a separation its founder had insisted on sixty years earlier. In 2003 its star internet analyst, Henry Blodget, was barred from the securities industry for life after his private emails were found to contradict his published recommendations.
Then the mortgages. In December 2006 Merrill Lynch paid $1.3 billion for First Franklin Financial, one of the largest subprime lenders in the country, to secure a supply of home loans for its collateralized debt obligations. Between 2006 and 2007 the firm was lead underwriter on 136 CDOs worth $93 billion. It kept pieces of them. They collapsed. All told, Merrill Lynch lost $51.8 billion on mortgage-backed securities. On Sunday, September 14, 2008, the same weekend Lehman Brothers failed, it agreed to be acquired by Bank of America for about $50 billion, or $29 a share, a 61 percent discount to its price a year earlier. For 2008, a year in which it reported losses of $27 billion, the firm paid $3.6 billion in bonuses. Nearly 700 people received more than a million dollars.
It is too neat, but it is also true. The firm founded on the idea of getting Main Street into stocks ended by packaging Main Street's mortgages into securities it could not sell. The firm whose founder told his clients in 1928 that "now is the time to get out of debt" died of debt.
In February 2019 Bank of America rebranded the unit. It became, simply, "Merrill." The name Charles Merrill had insisted on keeping in 1940, his dead friend's name, was taken off the door. Around the same time, the firm's brokers were being told to refer clients with less than $250,000 to invest to Merrill Edge, the bank's online platform, and were given no compensation for managing accounts below that line. Mr. Average Investor, it turned out, had a minimum.

What the Trust Bought

Charles Edward Merrill Jr. was born on August 17, 1920, the second child of the first marriage, and spent his childhood in New York. He went to Deerfield and Harvard. He was drafted into the war and served with the Fifth Army in North Africa, Italy, and Germany, and he would later write that he graduated not only from Harvard but "from the Fifth Army in Italy, where he received another type of education."
In Germany he met a teenage Jewish boy named Bernat Rosner, orphaned by the Holocaust. Merrill befriended him, helped him emigrate to the United States, and paid for his schooling. Rosner went to Harvard Law School and eventually became general counsel of Safeway Stores, the grocery chain the elder Merrill had built and Merrill's brother-in-law Robert Magowan ran. A boy from the ashes of Europe ended up minding the legal affairs of the store that sold the middle class its groceries. The sentence would strain belief in fiction. It is the plain fact of the record, recounted in a 2001 book, Uncommon Friendship.
The son was everything the father was not: faithful to his wife, Mary White Klohr, his high school sweetheart, for fifty-seven years, until her death in 1999; modest; frugal; uninterested in display. He lived on his trust and gave most of his energy away. In 1946 he helped found the Thomas Jefferson School in St. Louis. In 1958 he founded the Commonwealth School in Boston, which he funded and staffed personally and which occupied a pair of joined townhouses at the corner of Commonwealth Avenue and Dartmouth Street. He chose the building, he later wrote, because it had space and "a stained-glass window in the room that would be my office." The school had one rule: "Don't roller skate in the hallways." Students bussed the tables, washed the dishes, and emptied the trash. Merrill taught the Bible to every ninth grader, as literature rather than doctrine, and quietly paid tuition, sometimes college tuition, for students who could not.
He chaired the Charles E. Merrill Trust, the foundation built from his father's residual estate, which over twenty-three years gave away $114 million. Forty percent of the income was bound by the will to four schools and four hospitals; the rest was his to direct. In 1987 he published an account of the experience called The Checkbook, and it is splendidly ill-tempered. The foundation executive, he wrote, lives behind "all the habits of administration," which are "arranged to protect his ignorance, beginning with the 30th-floor office on Madison Avenue and the receptionist with honey-colored hair and Radcliffe accent paid to screen out deadbeats." His practical advice was unglamorous in a way his father would have recognized: "Write checks to repair the roof, replace the heating plant, or repaint the hallways." Sound fundamentals. No funded debt.
For more than fifteen years he chaired the board of trustees of Morehouse College in Atlanta. He had been impressed, Marian Wright Edelman later wrote, by "the confidence and pride of Morehouse men he had met in the army," and after the war he sought out the college and its president, Benjamin E. Mays. He established the Merrill Scholarships, a year of study and travel abroad, first for Morehouse students and then, beginning in 1957, the year after his father's death, for Spelman women as well. More than a hundred scholars went abroad through the program between the 1950s and the 1980s.
His explanation for the scholarships echoes, almost word for word, the language his father had used about the trusts and his brother had used about their cost. "If a trip to Prague, a city no Merrill had ever visited, could help build my independence," he said, "it could do the same for Black students and their schools." Independence again. The father bought it for his children. One son wrote that he wasn't sure he liked it. The other gave it away.
Charles Merrill Jr. died on November 29, 2017, at ninety-seven, in Nowy Sącz, in southern Poland, a country he had spent his later years traveling and working in. A Polish tabloid ran the news under the headline "Słynny miliarder zmarł w bloku w Nowym Sączu": famous billionaire dies in an apartment block in Nowy Sącz. He was not a billionaire. The apartment block was accurate.
Among the Spelman Merrill Scholars was a sophomore from Bennettsville, South Carolina, a small segregated town. She was eighteen when she was summoned to the president's office, terrified she had broken some rule, and told she had won. She ran back to her dorm in tears to call her mother. Her nominator, a young history professor named Howard Zinn, insisted, against every instinct of the closely supervised college, that she not go with a chaperoned group but travel on her own.
She went alone. The money had begun at a soda fountain in Green Cove Springs and passed through a bond department, a grocery chain, a stock-market crash avoided, a telegraph network, a trust that could not be broken, and a son who did not want any more of it than he already had. The first morning, in a Paris hotel across from the Luxembourg Gardens, with no parent or teacher or chaperone to prescribe the day, Marian Wright jumped up and down and yelled and pinched herself, again and again.

Part IIThe Playbook

Charles Merrill's career divides cleanly into three acts: underwriter of the chain stores from 1914 to 1930, de facto financial chief of Safeway from 1930 to 1940, and architect of the modern retail brokerage from 1940 until his death. What makes him worth studying is not any single act but the way each prepared the next, and the way the principles he articulated in a 1911 magazine article survived three industries and two decades of dormancy before being implemented at scale. What follows are the operating principles that can be drawn from the record, along with the ways his successors' abandonment of some of them proved their value by negative example.
M

Three Careers, One Thesis

Each phase of Merrill's working life built the capabilities the next one required.
1907
Arrives in New York; shares a YMCA room with Edmund Lynch. Learns cost accounting at Patchogue-Plymouth Mills.
1911
Publishes "Mr. Average Investor" in Leslie's Illustrated Weekly, laying out his customer-first thesis.
1914
Opens Charles E. Merrill & Co. at 7 Wall Street on January 6.
1926
Orchestrates the merger creating Safeway Stores.
1928
December 17 letter tells clients: "Now is the time to get out of debt."
1930
Spins off retail brokerage to E. A. Pierce; turns attention to Safeway.
1940
April 1 merger with E. A. Pierce and Cassatt; keeps the Lynch name.
1941
First annual report on Wall Street; merger with Fenner & Beane.
1944
First heart attack; governs through Winthrop Smith thereafter.
1956
Dies October 6 with 400,000 clients; estate largely to charity.
Principle 1

Make honesty the growth strategy, not the compliance cost

The most important thing Merrill ever wrote was not the 1928 letter but the 1911 magazine article, and its key move was to reframe ethics as economics. Brokers who pushed house positions and chased short-term commissions were not merely behaving badly, he argued; they were leaving money on the table, because long relationships with a broad base were worth more than quick extraction from a narrow one. "Thousands of customers scattered throughout the United States" were, in his words, "infinitely preferable" to dependence on a smaller, wealthier clientele.
This framing mattered because it was durable. A firm that is honest because honesty is noble will be honest until it becomes expensive. A firm that is honest because it understands honesty as the mechanism of its growth will defend that honesty as it defends its margins. Merrill's direct-mail circulars at Burr worked precisely because they were accurate in a market saturated with exaggeration; scarcity made truthfulness a differentiator.
The negative example arrived after his death. When research was again allowed to serve banking, the firm paid $100 million in 2002 to settle charges of misleading research. The founder's thesis held: dishonesty was not just wrong, it was ruinous.
Tactic: Identify the one form of candor your competitors cannot afford, and build your distribution around it.
Principle 2

Finance what you have worked behind the counter of

Merrill's edge in the chain-store boom did not come from a superior spreadsheet. It came from having stood behind his father's soda fountain in Green Cove Springs, watching inventory turn and margins thin, and from two years in a textile mill's back office that he likened to a university course in credit, cost accounting, and administration. When the chains came looking for capital, he understood their economics from the floor up.
The Safeway decade extended the lesson. Holding no title, Merrill spent the 1930s as the effective financial chief of a high-volume, low-margin consumer business. When he returned to brokerage in 1940, he brought with him a working knowledge of how to run a national retail system, knowledge that no investment banker of his generation possessed.
The general principle is that operating proximity produces non-obvious conviction. Merrill saw the dominance of chain retail earlier than his peers because he had felt, as a boy, the limits of the single store.
Tactic: Before backing or building in a sector, spend real time inside its least glamorous operating function.
Principle 3

Leave the party while the music is loudest

In 1928 the Dow rose about 50 percent. Merrill's firm told its clients to pay off their debts. He lobbied a sitting president to warn the public. He liquidated, by Harvard's account, his firm's own stock portfolio. The courage required was not intellectual; plenty of people suspected prices were too high. It was social. He had to be wrong-looking for nearly a year, in public, while everyone around him got richer.
His own explanation was almost insultingly simple: "when stocks are too high they come down." The skill was not prediction but the willingness to act on a commonplace truth at the moment it was least fashionable. His letter is a model of this: specific, unhysterical, actionable. It did not demand that clients sell everything; it told them to remove leverage. That is the move that preserves optionality.
Tactic: When conditions feel effortless, reduce leverage first and explain the decision in plain language to everyone who depends on you.
Principle 4

Exit a broken industry; return when you can rebuild it

The most counterintuitive decision of Merrill's career came in 1930, after he had been proved right. Rather than capitalize on his reputation, he sold the retail brokerage to E. A. Pierce and largely left the business. The financial industry of the early Depression was discredited, shrinking, and about to be remade by regulation. There was nothing to gain from fighting that current.
He returned in 1940 under radically different conditions: a dead partner, a failing but well-wired E. A. Pierce, a decade of retail operating experience, and a new regulatory floor that made his long-held ideas about honesty and disclosure easier to institutionalize. He did not come back to resume. He came back to redesign.
⇄

The Exit and the Return

What Merrill left in 1930 versus what he built in 1940.
Dimension1930 exit1940 return
PhaseUnderwriterBroker
Core businessMerchant banking for chain storesNational retail brokerage
DistributionHanded to E. A. PierceReclaimed, with 23,000 miles of wire
Operating knowledgeFinancial engineeringA decade of retail economics from Safeway
Market conditionCollapsing trustTrust to be rebuilt
Tactic: When your industry's foundations are cracking, step aside, accumulate adjacent skills, and return only with a design the old structure could not have supported.
Principle 5

Import the operating model of a different industry

Merrill's great innovation was not a financial product. It was the recognition that a brokerage could be run like a chain store. The 1940 New York Times headline announcing the new firm said it all: "customer-contact," "merchandising," smaller branch offices. Standardize the experience. Train the clerks to a common script. Put the same honest offering in a hundred cities. Make money on volume rather than on the occasional whale.
He had financed this model for Kresge, Penney, and Safeway for fifteen years before applying it to his own trade. Wall Street, which thought of itself as a craft of personal relationships and private knowledge, had never considered that it might be a retail business. Merrill had spent his life in retail.
Tactic: List the operating systems you have seen work in an adjacent industry and ask which one your own industry has been too proud to adopt.
Principle 6

Engineer the incentives before preaching the values

Merrill's customer-first ethos might have remained a slogan had he not hard-wired it. Paying brokers salaries rather than commissions alone removed much of the incentive to churn accounts. Separating research from investment banking removed the incentive to bend recommendations toward underwriting clients. The values followed the plumbing.
This is the principle the later firm most conspicuously abandoned, and the results are a natural experiment. When the separation of research and banking eroded, the firm paid for it in 2002. When the incentive structure rewarded holding and originating mortgage risk, the firm lost $51.8 billion. When it paid $3.6 billion in bonuses in a year it lost $27 billion, the compensation system was no longer aligned with anyone's interest but the recipients'.
Tactic: For every value you claim, identify the compensation line that enforces it, and if there is none, write one.
Principle 7

Disclose first and turn transparency into a moat

In 1941 Merrill Lynch became the first firm on Wall Street to publish an annual report. In an industry whose customers had just lived through 1929 and suspected, correctly, that insiders had played them, voluntary disclosure was a startling signal. It said: we have nothing to hide, and we are confident enough to show you.
Transparency is usually treated as a defensive obligation imposed by regulators. Merrill treated it as an offensive weapon. A competitor that declined to follow looked secretive by comparison; one that followed was conceding the first mover's framing. Either way, Merrill owned the story of trust.
Tactic: Publish something about your business that your competitors would prefer the market never asked about.
Principle 8

Treat credit as an asset that compounds

When Merrill reassembled his firm in 1940, he insisted on keeping the name of Edmund Lynch, who had been dead for over a year and had left the business a decade earlier. There was no transactional reason to do it. It was loyalty, and it was also a statement about continuity: the firm was not one man's vanity.
The same instinct governed his relationship with Winthrop Smith, who ran the firm from 1940 and whose name went on the door in 1958. Generous credit attracts and keeps the patient operators who make institutions last. Merrill, a famously self-absorbed man in his private life, was strikingly unselfish with institutional credit.
The 2019 rebrand that dropped "Lynch" is a small coda to this principle: what one generation preserved as a bond, a later owner discarded as a syllable.
Tactic: Put your earliest partners' names, literally or figuratively, somewhere permanent in the institution.
Principle 9

Govern through a lieutenant you trust more than yourself

Merrill's working pattern was consistent: pick an operator, give him the controls, and exercise influence from a distance. At Safeway it was Marion Skaggs, while Merrill held no title. At Merrill Lynch, after the heart attacks of 1944 and 1945, it was Win Smith, who ran the firm day to day as Merrill directed strategy from Long Island and Florida.
This was partly necessity and partly temperament. Merrill was a generator of ideas and an enthusiast of appetites; he was not built for the daily grind of administration. He knew it. The decisive work on the modern brokerage happened in roughly four healthy years, and the institution survived his incapacity for more than a decade because he had already installed someone capable of running it.
Tactic: Identify the person who could run your organization tomorrow, and begin transferring real authority to them before circumstances force it.
Principle 10

Find the customer where he already saves

Merrill did not have to invent the habit of middle-class saving. Life insurance companies had already persuaded American households to set money aside regularly. His insight, as Perkins describes it, was to look at that success and ask why the same households could not be persuaded to buy common stock, and to conclude that the barrier was trust, not appetite.
This is a different question from "how do we create demand?" It is "where does the behavior already exist, and what is stopping it from flowing to us?" The answer shaped every reform: salaried brokers, honest research, published reports, seminars. Each targeted the trust deficit rather than the desire to save.
Tactic: Find an industry that has already trained your target customer in the behavior you need, and diagnose precisely what keeps that behavior from reaching you.
Principle 11

Sell to the household, not the individual

Merrill instructed his offices to hold investment seminars at which husbands and wives could leave their children in care while both learned how to invest. Two readings are available. The generous one: Merrill understood that money decisions in mid-century America were household decisions and that excluding wives excluded half the decision. The cynical one, offered on his own Wikipedia page: with both spouses present, neither could defer the decision by consulting the other.
Both are correct, and Merrill would not have seen a conflict. The deeper lesson is that the unit of purchase is often not the person sitting across the desk. The chain-store financier knew that the grocery buyer was a family, and he extended that insight to securities.
Tactic: Map who actually participates in your customer's decision and design the sales experience to include them all.
Principle 12

Design your money's exit before you need to

Merrill made each of his children rich at an early age through trusts he could not revoke, and then, in the early 1950s, accepted their renunciation of further inheritance for $100 apiece. The result was an estate directed overwhelmingly to hospitals, churches, and schools, and a trust that disbursed $114 million over twenty-three years under the direction of a son who wrote a sharp-tongued book about how to give money away well.
The design had costs. James Merrill wrote that he was not sure he liked being rich at five. But it also produced Charles Merrill Jr.'s schools, his Morehouse chairmanship, and the Merrill Scholarships that sent Black students abroad on their own, a use of the fortune its builder could not have predicted and probably would not have chosen. The lesson is not that Merrill planned this. It is that early, irrevocable structure gave his heirs the independence to put the money somewhere he never would have.
Tactic: Settle the structure of your wealth's transfer while you are healthy, and build in enough independence that your heirs can surprise you.

Free playbook

Get The Business Model Playbook

58 business models, one visual page each: how the money flows, the metrics that matter, and who runs it. Free when you join the Faster Than Normal email.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Part IIIQuotes and Maxims

In their words

Having thousands of customers scattered throughout the United States is infinitely preferable to being dependent upon the fluctuating buying power of a smaller and perhaps on the whole wealthier group of investors in any one section.
— Charles E. Merrill, on the advantages of a broad customer base
The lesson that I had learned — when stocks are too high they come down — stood me in good stead in 1928-29.
— Charles E. Merrill, on his 1928 warning, as quoted in The New York Times
The best training I ever had; I learned human nature.
— Charles E. Merrill, on his newspaper job at the Tropical Sun
The equivalent of a university course in general, and credit, finance, cost accounting, and administration, in particular.
— Charles E. Merrill, on his years at Patchogue-Plymouth Mills
Write checks to repair the roof, replace the heating plant, or repaint the hallways.
— Charles E. Merrill Jr., The Checkbook (1987)

Maxims

  • Ethics is a distribution strategy. Honesty sold at scale beats cleverness sold to a few.
  • Know the counter before you fund the chain. Operating proximity produces conviction that spreadsheets cannot.
  • When stocks are too high they come down. The hardest market truths are the most obvious ones, acted on at the least comfortable moment.
  • Remove leverage before you remove exposure. Paying off debt preserves the option to stay in the game.
  • Leave a broken industry rather than defend it. Return only with a design the old structure could not support.
  • Borrow the operating model next door. Merrill ran a brokerage like a grocery chain, and that was the whole innovation.
  • Wire the values into the paycheck. Culture follows compensation, and drifts when compensation drifts.
  • Disclose before you are asked. Voluntary transparency is a moat that competitors can only cross by conceding your framing.
  • Keep your partner's name on the door. Institutional credit, generously given, outlasts the founder.
  • Structure your fortune's exit while you can still choose it. Early, irrevocable design gives heirs the independence to do what you never would.

Continue exploring

Related people

Ideas connected to this profile