What is Winner's Curse?

Winner's Curse is a mental model used for better thinking and decision-making.

How do you apply Winner's Curse?

To apply Winner's Curse, identify situations where this framework is relevant, then use it as a lens to evaluate your options and decisions. The model is most useful when combined with other complementary mental models.

What category does Winner's Curse fall under?

Winner's Curse falls under the Economics & Markets category of mental models. Other models in this category can be found on the Economics & Markets hub page.

Why is Winner's Curse important?

Winner's Curse is important because it provides a structured way to think about problems that would otherwise be approached with intuition alone. Understanding this model helps you avoid common reasoning errors and make better decisions.

Where does Winner's Curse come from?

Winner's Curse is discussed in the tradition of Capen / Clapp / Campbell.

Winner's Curse Mental Model…

Winner's Curse Mental Model… | Faster Than Normal

Economics & Markets

Section 1

The Core Idea

In a common-value auction, the object has the same value to everyone, but bidders don't know it. Each bids on an estimate. The winner is the bidder who estimated highest — and that usually means they overestimated. The winner's curse: you win because you bid more than others, and in common-value settings that often means you paid more than the asset is worth. Victory is a signal that you were too optimistic.

The curse appears whenever the winner is selected by who bids highest or who values the opportunity most. Oil leases, spectrum auctions, M&A, hiring races — the party that wins is often the one who was most bullish. If the average estimate was right, then the high bidder was above average by definition. Unless the winner has genuinely better information, they've overpaid. The strategic response is to shade your bid below your estimate to correct for the selection effect: conditional on winning, your estimate was likely too high.

The concept entered economics in the 1970s via work on oil-lease bidding. Capen, Clapp, and Campbell showed that bidders who ignored the curse consistently lost money. In private-value auctions — where each bidder has a different value — the curse is weaker because the high bidder may simply value the item most. The curse is strongest in common-value settings with many bidders and noisy estimates. The more bidders and the noisier the signals, the more the winner is selected for overestimation.

In business, the winner's curse shows up in competitive deal processes. The acquirer who wins a contested auction often paid more than the target is worth. The candidate who gets the job in a bidding war may be overpaid relative to marginal product. The startup that wins a hot funding round may have been valued above fundamentals. The defence: bid as if your estimate is too high when you win. Build in a margin of safety. Or stay out when the process selects for the most optimistic bidder and you can't justify being that bidder.

The curse is weaker when bidders have private values — when each bidder values the asset differently (e.g. synergies, strategic fit). Then the high bidder may genuinely have the highest value. The curse is strongest in pure common-value settings with many bidders and noisy estimates. In M&A, the target has a range of standalone value; bidders with synergies have a higher effective value. The "winner" may still overpay relative to standalone value but underpay relative to their own synergies. The key is to know whether you're in a common-value or private-value situation and bid accordingly.

Winner's Curse

Popular Mental Models

Continue exploring

The Core Idea

This connects to...

Popular Mental Models

Continue exploring

More like this, in your inbox

The Core Idea

This connects to...