AboutHow we built thisSponsorshipShop
SearchSubscribeDecision ToolsBusiness ModelsFrameworksReading Lists
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie PolicyRefund PolicyAccessibilityDisclaimer

© 2026 Faster Than Normal. All rights reserved.

Faster Than Normal
PeopleBusinessesShopNewsletter
Ask a question →
Newsletter/The Tony Marsh Method, Checklists, Table Selection & More
The Tony Marsh Method, Checklists, Table Selection & More

The Tony Marsh Method, Checklists, Table Selection & More

Alex Brogan·November 5, 2022
When chimpanzees outperform human experts on knowledge tests, we're confronting an uncomfortable truth about the limits of our supposed expertise. That's one lesson from eight mental models that reveal how the best operators think — frameworks that cut through complexity to expose the underlying mechanics of better decision-making.

The Tony Marsh Method

Memory formation follows a basic rule: encode information as closely as possible to the environment where you'll need to retrieve it. This principle, known as the Tony Marsh Method, explains why classroom French fails but conversation with Parisians works.
Context isn't decoration. It's the architecture of recall. When learning maps to usage conditions, retention jumps dramatically because your brain builds retrieval pathways that mirror real application. The method works for everything from sales presentations to surgical procedures — practice in the conditions where performance matters.

Strategic Table Selection

The game you choose matters more than how you play it. Warren Buffett built his fortune not by becoming the world's greatest investor across all asset classes, but by finding undervalued companies he could understand and holding them for decades. Table selection over tactical brilliance.
You don't need to excel at difficult tasks if you excel at avoiding them entirely. The highest performers consistently choose battlefields where their advantages compound rather than where their weaknesses get exposed. Pick the easy table. Nail the execution.

The Power of Systematic Process

Checklists serve two functions that separate amateur from professional operations. First, they make improvement visible — you can't optimize what you haven't documented. Second, they eliminate variance in critical processes, which matters more than most people realize.
Atul Gawande's research showed that simple surgical checklists reduced complications by 35% across eight hospitals. The issue wasn't surgeon competence but process consistency. When the stakes are high and the steps are known, systematic execution beats improvisation every time.
Where can you substitute systematic process for heroic individual effort? The answer reveals optimization opportunities most organizations miss.

Building Antifragile Systems

Antifragility means gaining strength from disorder rather than merely surviving it. The concept, developed by Nassim Taleb, explains why some systems thrive under pressure while others collapse.
Consider how your immune system works — exposure to manageable stress makes it stronger, not weaker. The longest-surviving institutions, from the Catholic Church to certain family businesses, share this characteristic. They don't just withstand volatility; they extract value from it.
To build antifragile systems, look for asymmetric upside opportunities where small downside risks create large potential gains. Then position yourself to benefit when unexpected events inevitably arrive.

The Lindy Effect in Practice

Non-perishable ideas and technologies gain life expectancy with age. Something that has survived 50 years has proven its durability and is statistically likely to survive another 50 years. Every additional year of survival indicates longer remaining life expectancy.
This principle, named after Lindy's restaurant in New York where comedians would test material, explains why classical literature, fundamental mathematical concepts, and basic human wisdom retain value while fads disappear. When evaluating frameworks or strategies, consider their track record across time and conditions.
The Lindy Effect suggests investing in proven principles over promising innovations, especially for foundational elements of strategy or operations.

The Chimpanzee Test

Chimpanzees consistently outperform humans on certain knowledge tests, particularly those involving global statistics and trends. The phenomenon reveals our tendency toward overconfidence in areas where we lack real expertise.
Hans Rosling demonstrated this repeatedly with his global health and development quizzes. Educated professionals would score worse than random chance because they relied on outdated assumptions and biased mental models rather than current data.
The lesson isn't that chimpanzees are smarter. It's that human knowledge feels more complete than it actually is. Before making confident statements about complex global issues, consider whether you're operating from real knowledge or sophisticated ignorance.

Avoiding the Halfpinion Trap

Scott Adams coined "halfpinion" to describe the common error of considering only costs or benefits rather than both. When people ignore one side of the equation, their analysis becomes propaganda rather than reasoning.
If you want to change minds, present the full picture. Compare complete costs to complete benefits. Acknowledge trade-offs honestly. This approach builds credibility because it demonstrates intellectual integrity rather than advocacy.
Halfpinions feel satisfying because they confirm existing beliefs. Full opinions require harder thinking but create better decisions. The difference often determines success in negotiations, strategic planning, and leadership situations.

Chesterton's Fence

Before removing any system or process, understand why it was implemented originally. G.K. Chesterton's principle warns against the reformer who tears down fences without knowing why they were built.
Existing systems often encode lessons from past failures that aren't immediately visible. What looks like bureaucratic inefficiency might be preventing a specific type of error. What appears to be an outdated process might be solving a problem that hasn't recurred recently.
The first step in modifying any existing system is developing complete understanding of its original purpose. Only then can you safely determine whether that purpose still matters and whether better solutions exist.

These eight frameworks share a common theme: they reveal the gap between surface understanding and operational wisdom. Master operators don't just know more facts — they think more clearly about cause and effect, context and application, and the hidden forces that drive outcomes.
The best decisions come from better thinking tools, not better information alone.
← All editions