The Letter in the Drawer
On the eve of his thirty-second birthday, J.W. "Bill" Marriott Jr. found a letter tucked inside his desk drawer. It was 1964, and his father — the Mormon rancher's son who had turned a nine-stool root beer stand into a $100 million food and lodging conglomerate — was about to name him president of the company. The elder Marriott, sixty-four and already weakened by the heart attacks that would shadow his final two decades, had distilled a lifetime of operational obsession into a handwritten set of guideposts: take care of your people, and they will take care of your customers. Delegate, but inspect. Never stop moving. The letter, which Bill Jr. would keep for the rest of his career and eventually publish in his memoir
Without Reservations, was less a management manual than a DNA transfer — the encoding of a family's operational philosophy into a document that would, through six decades of leadership, compound into the largest hotel company on earth.
Today Marriott International operates approximately 9,700 properties across more than 30 brands in 143 countries and territories, managing roughly 1.7 million rooms — a system so vast that on any given night, more people sleep under a Marriott-affiliated roof than live in the city of Philadelphia. The company's market capitalization hovers near $68 billion. Its loyalty program, Marriott Bonvoy, counts over 210 million members. And yet Marriott International, Inc. — NASDAQ: MAR, headquartered at 7750 Wisconsin Avenue in Bethesda, Maryland — owns almost none of those rooms. This is the central paradox, the architectural trick that explains everything: the world's largest hotel company is, in its financial essence, a brand-licensing and management-fee business that has systematically shed the capital-intensive real estate it built its reputation on. The Marriotts discovered, across three generations, that the most valuable thing a hotel company can produce is not a hotel. It's the system around the hotel — the brand, the loyalty program, the reservation engine, the operating playbook — and they figured it out before almost anyone else in the industry.
By the Numbers
The Marriott Empire
~9,700Properties across 143 countries and territories
~1.7MRooms worldwide (including ~1M in North America)
30+Hotel brands from luxury to midscale
210M+Marriott Bonvoy loyalty program members
~$68BMarket capitalization (2024)
~$6.4BTotal revenues, FY2024 (management & franchise fees)
~573,000Rooms in development pipeline (YE 2023)
97Years since the first root beer stand opened
The story of how a family got from root beer to Ritz-Carlton — from a $6,000 investment in 1927 to a company that returned over $4.5 billion to shareholders in 2023 alone — is not a straight line. It is a story told in pivots: from food to lodging, from ownership to management, from domestic to global, from analog loyalty to digital ecosystem. Each pivot looked, at the moment of execution, like a betrayal of the company's identity. Each turned out to be its preservation.
Root Beer, Sheep, and the Theology of Service
John Willard Marriott was born on September 17, 1900, in the settlement that bore his family's name — a cluster of Mormon homesteads at the foot of the Wasatch Range in northern Utah. The second of eight children born to Hyrum Willard Marriott and Ellen Morris Marriott, he grew up tending sugar beets and sheep on a small, hard-worked farm. At eight he was herding. At thirteen he enlisted his siblings to grow lettuce on fallow acreage and presented his father with the $2,000 harvest. At fourteen, Hyrum sent the boy alone by rail to San Francisco with 3,000 sheep to sell. The details matter: this was a childhood organized around accountability without supervision, around the idea that you hand someone responsibility and trust them to find the method.
The Mormon Church required missionary service, and at nineteen Marriott traveled east to preach in New England. He ended up in Washington, D.C., in the dead of summer — a swampy, sweltering city where, he later recalled, a cold drink could make a man's fortune. The idea lodged itself. But first, education: after his mission he enrolled at Weber Junior College in Ogden, paying tuition by teaching theology classes, then transferred to the University of Utah, funding his studies by selling woolen underwear to lumberjacks in the Pacific Northwest. The improbable commercial range — sheep, lettuce, underwear, theology — established a pattern. This was a man who would sell anything, to anyone, anywhere, and who treated every transaction as an expression of service.
During his senior year, an A&W root beer franchise opened in Salt Lake City, and the memory of that Washington summer crystallized into a business plan. Marriott secured the A&W franchise rights for Washington, D.C., Baltimore, and Richmond. He and a partner, Hugh Colton, pooled $6,000 — $3,000 of Marriott's own savings, the rest borrowed — and on May 20, 1927, the same day Charles Lindbergh departed Roosevelt Field for Paris, they opened a nine-stool root beer stand at 3128 14th Street NW in Washington. Three weeks later Marriott raced back to Utah for his wedding to Alice Sheets, who had just graduated from the University of Utah. Their honeymoon was a cross-country drive in a Model T Ford back to the root beer stand. Alice became the company's first bookkeeper, executive chef, and interior designer.
Take care of associates and they'll take care of your customers, and the customers will come back again and again.
The business nearly died that first winter. Root beer is a summer proposition. Marriott persuaded A&W to let him add food service, and with recipes borrowed from the chef at the nearby Mexican Embassy — chili, tamales, barbecue beef sandwiches — the root beer stand became the first Hot Shoppe. By 1932 there were seven Hot Shoppes in the D.C. area. Marriott pioneered drive-in service on the East Coast, buying vacant lots adjacent to restaurants, removing curbs, and deploying waiters called "curbers" who carried trays on fold-up brackets clamped to car doors. It was an act of spatial imagination: the restaurant's footprint suddenly included the parking lot, the street, the customer's own vehicle. The instinct to extend the service perimeter beyond the physical plant would define the company for the next century.
The Adjacency Machine
What distinguished J. Willard Marriott from other restaurateurs of his era was an almost compulsive instinct for adjacency — the ability to look at an existing operation and see the next business hiding inside it. In 1937, watching customers at the Hot Shoppe near Hoover Airport buying food to carry onto their flights, he invented airline catering. The company delivered boxed meals to planes on the tarmac, a service that grew into a massive institutional food-service division and would remain part of the business for over fifty years. During World War II, Hot Shoppes managed cafeterias in government buildings, defense plants, and military housing — another adjacency, this time into contract food service. By the end of the war, the chain had spread across the East Coast, and Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. was the fastest-growing and most profitable organization in the American food and lodging business.
The hotel business, when it came, was itself an adjacency. Bill Marriott Jr. tells the story with characteristic bluntness: his father opened the company's first motel — the Twin Bridges Marriott Motor Hotel near the 14th Street Bridge in Arlington, Virginia — in 1957, but didn't really know how to run it. "So I said, 'Nobody's running this hotel, why don't you let me have a crack at it?'" the younger Marriott recalled on NPR decades later. "He said, 'You don't know anything about the hotel business.' And I said, 'Well neither does anybody else around here.'" He was twenty-five. The exchange captures something essential about the Marriott style — a willingness to enter unfamiliar territory armed with operational rigor rather than industry expertise, and a family dynamic that treated blunt candor as a form of respect.
🏨
From Root Beer to Hotels
Key adjacencies in the Marriott Corporation's first five decades
1927Nine-stool A&W root beer stand opens in Washington, D.C.
1928Third Hot Shoppe opens — first drive-in restaurant on the East Coast.
1937Airline catering launched at Hoover Airport.
1953Hot Shoppes, Inc. goes public; Marriott family retains controlling stake.
1957First hotel: Twin Bridges Marriott Motor Hotel in Arlington, VA.
1964Bill Marriott Jr. becomes president at age 32.
1967Company renamed Marriott Corporation; enters cruise and theme park businesses.
1972
The 1960s saw Marriott Corporation diversify with abandon — cruise ships, theme parks (two Great America parks, later sold to Six Flags), airport terminal operations, institutional food service. By the time of J. Willard Marriott Sr.'s death in August 1985, the corporation employed 140,000 people in 26 countries, operated 1,400 restaurants and 143 hotels in 95 cities, and generated $3.5 billion in annual revenue. The company's stock, publicly traded since 1953, was still controlled by the Marriott family. And the man running it had been doing so, effectively, since he was twenty-five.
The Insight That Changed Everything
The most consequential strategic decision in Marriott's history was not the acquisition of Starwood, though that deal would create the world's largest hotel company. It was not the founding of Courtyard by Marriott, though that brand would democratize business travel. It was something quieter, more structural, and far more radical: the realization, arrived at by Bill Marriott Jr. in the late 1970s, that the hotel business and the hotel real estate business were fundamentally different enterprises with fundamentally different capital structures, risk profiles, and return characteristics — and that conflating them was destroying shareholder value.
The insight came from watching the numbers. Building a full-service Marriott hotel cost tens of millions of dollars. The return on that invested capital, even for a well-managed property, was modest — mid-single digits in many years. The real returns came from management fees — a percentage of revenue, a share of profits — which required no capital investment at all. A management contract was, in essence, pure margin. The hotel itself was a depreciating asset tied to a specific location, subject to real estate cycles, local market conditions, and the whims of municipal zoning boards. The management contract was a recurring revenue stream attached to a brand, a system, and a customer relationship. One was heavy. The other was light.
Bill Marriott began shifting the company's business model in the late 1970s from hotel ownership to property management and franchising. The mechanics were elegant: Marriott Corporation would develop hotels, fund their construction — often using innovative financing structures — and then sell the physical assets to investors (pension funds, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts) while retaining long-term management contracts. The company made money three times: on the development fee, on the sale, and on the management contract that ran for decades afterward. It was a financial flywheel powered by the separation of brand from brick.
Nobody's running this hotel, why don't you let me have a crack at it?
This was not merely clever financing. It was a reconceptualization of what a hotel company is. The traditional model — build it, own it, operate it — treated the hotel as an indivisible unit. Marriott's innovation was to unbundle it into components: the real estate (someone else's problem), the brand (Marriott's crown jewel), the management system (Marriott's daily business), and the customer relationship (Marriott's enduring moat). Each component could be optimized independently. The real estate could be held by entities best suited to own depreciating assets. The brand could be extended across price points and geographies without corresponding capital commitments. The management system could be codified, replicated, and scaled. And the customer relationship — the loyalty program, the reservation system, the data — could compound indefinitely.
The Split
The logical terminus of this unbundling arrived in 1993, and it arrived with the force of a corporate divorce. Marriott Corporation split into two public companies: Marriott International, a hotel management and franchising company headed by Bill Marriott Jr., and Host Marriott Corporation (later Host Hotels & Resorts), a hotel ownership company chaired by his brother, Richard Marriott. The split was controversial. Bondholders sued, arguing that the separation left Host Marriott saddled with the real estate debt while Marriott International walked away with the high-margin management contracts. They were not wrong about the mechanics — that was, in fact, the point. The litigation settled, but the strategic logic was vindicated over the next three decades. Marriott International became an asset-light compounder. Host Marriott became one of the largest hotel REITs in the world. Both thrived, but in entirely different ways and with entirely different capital requirements.
The 1993 split was the Rosetta Stone of modern hospitality. It demonstrated, with the clarity that only a family willing to literally divide a company between two brothers can achieve, that brand and real estate are separable assets — and that the returns to brand management, in a services business, vastly exceed the returns to real estate ownership over time. Hilton, Hyatt, InterContinental, and virtually every major hotel company would eventually adopt some version of this model. But Marriott got there first, and the head start matters: by the time competitors fully embraced asset-light strategies, Marriott had already spent decades refining the management playbook, the franchise system, and — crucially — the loyalty program that made the whole thing cohere.
Brands as Portfolios, Portfolios as Moats
The asset-light model unlocked a second strategic insight: if you don't need to build a hotel to add a brand, you can add a lot of brands. Marriott's brand portfolio expanded relentlessly across the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s — not through vanity or unfocused diversification, but through a systematic effort to cover every price point, trip purpose, and customer segment in the lodging market.
Courtyard by Marriott, launched in 1983, was the company's first deliberate brand extension — a moderate-priced hotel designed specifically for business travelers, conceived through painstaking consumer research that identified the gap between full-service Marriott hotels and the motel market below. Residence Inn, acquired in 1987, addressed the extended-stay segment. Fairfield Inn (1987) targeted budget-conscious travelers. SpringHill Suites (1998) and TownePlace Suites (1997) filled further niches. Each brand was designed with a specific customer in mind, a specific price point, a specific operating model, and — critically — a specific construction cost that made it attractive to the franchise owners and developers who would actually build the properties.
The logic is portfolio theory applied to hospitality. A single brand serves a single customer need. A portfolio of brands, each occupying a distinct position on the price-quality continuum, serves the full range of human travel. A guest who stays at a Fairfield Inn on a budget road trip might stay at a Marriott Hotels property on a business trip and a Ritz-Carlton on an anniversary. The loyalty program — first Marriott Rewards, now Marriott Bonvoy — stitches the portfolio together, ensuring that every stay, at every price point, accrues value within the same ecosystem. The guest never has a reason to leave.
This is the architectural trick that makes Marriott's scale defensible. A competitor can build a better luxury hotel or a cheaper budget hotel. It is extraordinarily difficult to replicate a 30-brand portfolio with a loyalty program that converts a $99 Fairfield Inn night into lifetime customer equity at The Ritz-Carlton.
The Starwood Coup
On November 16, 2015, Marriott International announced its agreement to acquire Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide for approximately $12.2 billion in a cash-and-stock deal — the largest hotel merger in history. The acquisition, which closed in September 2016 after a brief bidding war with Anbang Insurance Group of China, was the culmination of the portfolio logic Bill Marriott had been building for decades.
Starwood brought brands that Marriott lacked and coveted: W Hotels, the lifestyle brand that had defined a generation of design-forward hotels; St. Regis, with its old-money luxury positioning; Westin, with its wellness-oriented identity; Le Méridien, with its European cultural sensibility; and the Sheraton franchise, a massive global footprint that had been undermanaged and was ripe for renovation. Starwood also brought its own loyalty program — Starwood Preferred Guest (SPG) — which was smaller than Marriott Rewards but punched far above its weight in customer devotion, particularly among business travelers and the design-conscious affluent segment.
The integration was enormous. Marriott combined three loyalty programs (Marriott Rewards, SPG, and Ritz-Carlton Rewards) into a single platform, Marriott Bonvoy, launched in February 2019. The combined company emerged with roughly 1.1 million rooms worldwide, a number so large it represented approximately 7% of global branded room supply. The development pipeline — the contractually committed rooms not yet opened — swelled to over half a million.
The deal was not without cost. A massive data breach disclosed in November 2018 exposed the personal information of up to 500 million guests from the Starwood reservations database — a system Marriott had inherited but not yet fully integrated. The breach, which had actually begun in 2014, before the acquisition, became one of the largest data-security incidents in corporate history and resulted in regulatory fines and litigation. It was a brutal reminder that in a digital hospitality business, the customer database is simultaneously the most valuable asset and the most dangerous liability.
The Man Who Wasn't a Marriott
For its first eighty-five years, Marriott was led exclusively by members of the founding family. J. Willard Sr. ran the company from 1927 until his son took over in the 1960s. Bill Marriott Jr. served as CEO for forty years — from 1972 to 2012 — one of the longest tenures in the history of American public companies. When he finally stepped back, the board did something that would have been unthinkable a generation earlier: they named an outsider.
Arne Sorenson, who became CEO in 2012, was the first non-family member to lead Marriott. Raised in the flatlands of rural Minnesota, the son of a Lutheran minister, Sorenson had studied international relations at Luther College before attending the University of Minnesota Law School. He joined Marriott in 1996 as a member of the mergers-and-acquisitions team, having previously been an attorney at Latham & Watkins, where he advised — among other clients — Marriott Corporation itself. Tall, cerebral, and endowed with a warmth that colleagues described as genuine rather than performative, Sorenson rose through the company's finance and development ranks, becoming CFO and then president before his appointment as CEO.
The transition was significant not because Sorenson changed the culture — he did not — but because he proved that the culture could survive without a Marriott at the helm. The family's values — "put people first," hands-on management, an almost compulsive commitment to operational consistency — had by then been so deeply encoded into the organization's systems and rituals that they persisted independent of bloodline. Sorenson's great gift was understanding that his job was to accelerate the strategy Bill Marriott had set in motion, not to reinvent it. The Starwood acquisition was Sorenson's masterstroke: a bet that the asset-light, multi-brand, loyalty-driven model could absorb a competitor's portfolio and emerge stronger.
Sorenson died on February 15, 2021, at the age of sixty-two, after a battle with pancreatic cancer. His emotional video message to Marriott employees during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic — filmed from his home, bald from chemotherapy, his voice steady — became one of the most widely shared pieces of corporate communication in memory. "I have never had a more difficult moment than this one," he said, announcing furloughs and layoffs that would affect tens of thousands of workers. The pandemic reduced Marriott's revenue per available room by over 60% at its nadir. The company lost $267 million in 2020. Sorenson did not live to see the recovery.
The Pandemic and the Proof of Model
COVID-19 was, for the hotel industry, an existential stress test. Travel stopped. Occupancy rates at U.S. hotels fell below 25% in April 2020. The question for every hotel company was whether they could survive a period of near-zero revenue — and the answer depended almost entirely on their capital structure.
Marriott's asset-light model, which critics had occasionally derided as a kind of financial abstraction — a hotel company that doesn't own hotels — proved its worth in the most brutal possible proving ground. Because Marriott managed and franchised properties rather than owning them, the company's fixed costs were a fraction of what they would have been in an ownership model. The real estate risk — the mortgage payments, the property taxes, the maintenance costs on empty buildings — sat on the balance sheets of Marriott's hotel owners, not on Marriott's own. This was painful for those owners. It was survivable for Marriott.
The company drew down its credit facility, suspended share buybacks, slashed corporate expenses, and waited. Anthony Capuano, who had served as group president overseeing global development, was named CEO in February 2021, just days after Sorenson's death. An engineer by training — he holds a civil engineering degree from Cornell — Capuano had spent his career on the development side of the business, negotiating management agreements, cultivating owner relationships, and expanding Marriott's global pipeline. He was not a marketing visionary or a cultural icon. He was a systems thinker who understood that Marriott's moat lived in the density of its relationships with property owners and the depth of its operating playbook.
Our culture is very much an employee-first culture, and we wanted to make sure they had access to education about the vaccinations and the flexibility to take time off work if they chose to get vaccinated.
The recovery vindicated both the model and the man. By 2023, Marriott's worldwide revenue per available room had surpassed pre-pandemic levels. Full-year comparable systemwide constant-dollar RevPAR rose 15% in 2023. The company signed a record 164,000 organic rooms globally, including a landmark deal with MGM Resorts International that added 37,000 rooms. The development pipeline reached an all-time high of roughly 573,000 rooms. And the asset-light model produced, as it was designed to, enormous free cash flow: Marriott returned over $4.5 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 2023. Fourth quarter 2023 adjusted EBITDA hit $1.197 billion.
The Bonvoy Gravity Well
Loyalty programs in hospitality are often dismissed as commoditized point-accumulation schemes — interchangeable mechanisms for bribing repeat customers. Marriott Bonvoy is something different. With over 210 million members and counting, it functions less as a rewards program than as a gravitational system, pulling an enormous share of global travel spending into Marriott's orbit.
The economics are straightforward but powerful. A Bonvoy member booking through Marriott's direct channels — the app, the website, a direct call — costs Marriott nothing in commission. A booking through an online travel agency like Expedia or Booking.com costs 15–25% in commission. Every percentage point of demand shifted from OTAs to direct channels drops straight to the bottom line — both Marriott's and its property owners'. The loyalty program, then, is not a cost center. It is a distribution weapon.
But the program's deeper function is portfolio cohesion. Marriott's 30-plus brands span an enormous range: from a $99-per-night Fairfield Inn near an interstate off-ramp to a $2,000-per-night suite at The St. Regis in New York. Without a loyalty program binding them, these brands would be competitors — each cannibalizing the other's customer base. With Bonvoy, they become a ladder. A business traveler earning points at Courtyard properties on Tuesday nights in Topeka can redeem them for a weekend at W Barcelona. The cross-subsidy is invisible to the guest and enormously valuable to the system: it transforms low-margin volume stays into the funding mechanism for high-margin aspirational stays. Every rung of the ladder reinforces the one above it.
The program has expanded beyond hotel stays into what Marriott calls "travel experiences" — dining, transportation, tours, activities, and, notably, the Ritz-Carlton Yacht Collection, a pair of luxury cruise ships launched in 2022. Marriott also launched Homes & Villas by Marriott Bonvoy in 2019, a curated home-rental offering that now encompasses hundreds of thousands of listings — a direct response to Airbnb, executed not as a panicked defensive move but as a natural extension of the loyalty ecosystem. As one Marriott development executive described the logic: the person who books a Marriott for business might want a vacation rental house for a family trip. Bonvoy ensures both transactions stay in the ecosystem.
The Family That Stayed
The Marriott family's continued involvement in the company is, by the standards of American capitalism, anachronistic. J. Willard Marriott Sr. ran the business from 1927 to 1972. Bill Marriott Jr. ran it from 1972 to 2012 — forty years as CEO, then executive chairman until his retirement in May 2022 at the age of ninety. His son, David Marriott, became chairman of the board. The family still holds a significant economic stake and exercises cultural influence that far exceeds its formal governance role.
The continuity matters because it explains the company's culture in ways that org charts and mission statements cannot. Bill Marriott Jr. visited hundreds of hotels annually for decades — walking kitchens, shaking hands with housekeepers, checking the thread count of towels. This was not performance. It was theology. The Marriott family's Latter-day Saints faith, with its emphasis on service, stewardship, and community, infused the corporate culture with a seriousness about employee welfare that went beyond human-resources best practices. When the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For list ranked Marriott eighth in 2025, with 90% of associates endorsing the company compared to a 57% average, the survey was measuring something that had been accumulating for ninety-eight years.
The winds blow, but there are some fundamental truths for those 98 years. We welcome all to our hotels and we create opportunities for all — and fundamentally those will never change. The words might change, but that's who we are as a company.
When President Trump's executive orders on DEI roiled corporate America in January 2025, Capuano — the first non-Marriott CEO, the engineer, the deals guy — flew to the Americas Lodging Investment Summit and channeled a phrase that could have come from the founder: the words might change, but the values don't. Within twenty-four hours he received 40,000 emails from Marriott associates thanking him. The response revealed something about the depth of institutional identity in an era of corporate shape-shifting. The culture is not decorative. It is structural.
The family's philanthropic footprint extends the pattern. Following Arne Sorenson's death, Marriott created a $20 million endowment for Howard University's hospitality program — honoring both Sorenson's legacy and the company's longstanding commitment to creating pathways for underrepresented communities. J. Willard Marriott Sr. was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1988. The Marriott Ranch — a 4,200-acre working cattle ranch in Virginia's Blue Ridge foothills, purchased by the founder in 1951 because it reminded him of his boyhood in Utah — still operates as a family retreat, a bed-and-breakfast, and a quiet monument to an origin story that spans from sheep to suites.
The System Behind the System
Behind the brand portfolio and the loyalty program lies a third layer of competitive advantage that is less visible but arguably more durable: the operating system. Marriott's playbook for running a hotel — from revenue management algorithms to housekeeping schedules to the precise temperature of the breakfast buffet — has been codified, tested, and refined across nearly seven decades and tens of thousands of properties. It is the institutional knowledge that hotel owners are paying for when they sign a management or franchise agreement.
The innovation lab at Marriott's Bethesda headquarters, led by Jeff Voris, Senior Vice President of Global Design Strategies, operates more like a product-development studio than a traditional hotel design department.
Prototype rooms are built, tested by real guests, and iterated in cycles that borrow more from software development than from architecture. A recently demonstrated concept features a bed that descends from the ceiling at the touch of a panel, transforming a living space into a bedroom and back — a reconceptualization of how square footage is allocated that has implications for construction cost, guest satisfaction, and revenue per available square foot simultaneously.
On the data side, Marriott's revenue management operation — described by John Cook, the company's Senior Director of Data Science, as an ongoing effort to bridge "data people" and "business people" — uses machine learning to optimize pricing across its global portfolio in real time. The scale advantage is compounding: with 9,700 properties generating granular occupancy, rate, and demand data, Marriott's pricing algorithms have more training data than any competitor. Every additional property added to the system makes the system smarter. Every system improvement makes the next management contract more valuable.
Nine Stools on Fourteenth Street
The distance from a root beer stand at 3128 14th Street NW to a $68 billion global hospitality enterprise is nearly a century of compounding — of adjacent moves, structural innovations, and the relentless encoding of a family's values into an operating system that outlives any individual. Three generations of Marriotts built the machine. An outsider proved it could run without them. A pandemic proved it could survive the worst. And through all of it, the central mechanism remained the same: take care of the associates, and they will take care of the customers, and the customers will come back again and again.
The letter Bill Marriott found in his desk drawer in 1964 is still, in some sense, in the drawer — still being read, still being operationalized, still compounding. In 2023, Marriott opened its doors on average once every seven hours to a new property somewhere in the world. One in four of those new openings was a conversion — an existing hotel, previously independent or affiliated with a competitor, choosing to join the Marriott system. They weren't buying real estate. They were buying the system. They were buying the letter.
